Preview

Political theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1059 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Political theory
Anthony Spencer
Professor Robinson
Political Theory
Thought Piece three
For a human to lead a truly free life, they must dissolve all ties to civil and social existence and live as an individual. Once you enter into society you give up your right to freedom in exchange for protection from the sovereign state. In doing so you have chosen to be bound by society and it’s government. That interference in the individual’s day-to-day life should be limited in an ideal state, for too much would be a determent to society. The correct proportion of government to freedom is the biggest obstacle to human liberty aside from the individuals themselves.
When people elect to come together and create a sovereign state they are giving up their right to act solely as an individual. It is this entrance into the state that is cause for empathy and morality between citizens of the state. In exchange for entering into society the individual is bound, but only by what will cause it’s death. Jean-Jacques Rousseau was a modern thinker who brought the theory of the social contract and the state of nature with him. The state of nature is the hypothetical, prehistoric place and time where human beings live uncorrupted by society. The most crucial characteristic of the state of nature is that the citizens have complete physical freedom and are at liberty to essentially do as they wish. Rousseau's principal aim in writing The Social Contract is to determine how freedom may be possible in civil society. By entering into society, we place restraints on our behavior, which make it possible to live in a community. The state of nature is what he refers to as the state when people are truly free. Rousseau strips away all the ideals that centuries of development have imposed on the true nature of man. He comes to the conclusion that many of the ideas we take for granted, such as property, law, and moral inequality; actually have no basis in nature. For Rousseau, modern society generally compares

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I chose this HCPCS Level II modifier code because the cortisone 10 mg injection procedure was performed on the right side of the body.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau explains the philosophical underpinnings of the social contract as well as its suitable form. The suitable form is the ‘sovereign’ which according to Rousseau is the collective description the people who mutually agree to enter into a civil society. The individuals may have different needs and opinions, but the sovereign, as a product of the social contract, expresses the common will and good for the entire…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Political Science 101

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages

    What is meritocracy and how is it different from democracy? Identify an example of a government or US state agency that is based on the principle of democracy and one based on the principle of meritocracy.…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political Science 1

    • 3570 Words
    • 15 Pages

    1. Which of the following is NOT a role or power conferred on the President directly by the constitution?…

    • 3570 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    . .with the intention of better preserving himself, his liberty and property”. Individuals relinquish their absolute freedom and agree to follow laws because a government can protect one’s liberties far better than individuals. Thus, a free society is one in which its government ensures the basic rights of its citizens while maximizing their right to liberty. But what happens if a government neglects its purpose and passes laws that curtail both autonomy and natural rights?…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau Equality

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rousseau, your claims on the state of nature are questionable. You first claim that people equal in nature and thus are in a better state in nature. Yet, you then state that nature makes people more physically apt and that only the strong can survive. This would imply that a form of inequality, a natural prejudice would form against those not physically capable. Thus, you contradict yourself by stating that nature is equal and then imply a form of inequality in nature. In addition, it is important to raise the question: why do we even need a social contract in the first place? At some point in time in order for mankind to survive, they have to enter into a civilization. In order to for people to retain their natural equality, according to you,…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to implement freedom society requires the identifications of and protection of all rights of an individual and government being a protector of those rights. As stated by () the…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Insofar as the sovereign is limited to acting in the best interest of its citizens, individuals are also limited to acting in the best interest of the collective will and the sovereign. Some individuals might act in their own interest only, while still enjoying all the benefits and freedoms that the sovereign provides to them. Therefore, Rousseau suggests that individuals need to be “forced to be free”: that citizens need laws that force them to abide by the measures taken by the general will. Although individuals are able to follow any liberty and instincts in a state of nature, they become limited in the civil society, by rules that are based on reason and general will. This way, they become more noble and civil. By entering the…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rousseau's central aim in the Social Contract is to explain the sources and limits of legitimate authority. He believes that our duty towards the state stem from a social contract or social pact. By means of which groups of individuals are transformed into a body politic; a whole which has its own genuine will which is not necessarily from some of the individual wills of the people which is composed.…

    • 2627 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political Philosophy

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Is the Realist argument that a hegemon is necessary to maintain stability in the international system correct?…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political Theory

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout our exploration of contemporary political theory we have attempted to seek an understanding of the American Experience by studying relationships. Our findings continue to show us a major disconnect that festers between American ideology, social institutions and our citizens. American thought, rooted in concepts of fear, revenge and isolation have bred a culture of disengagement from one’s surroundings.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rousseau wrote The Social Contract in 1762. He saw the Social Contract as the solution to the problem of how man may obey his ruler but still remain free. Rousseau sought to balance the interests of the sovereign and subject so finely that he took the view that a breach of the social contract entitled the subject to return to their natural state of liberty. Rousseau argued that any loss of the rights handed up to the sovereign entitled the subject to revert back to their natural state. The state of nature was, in his eyes, a state of liberty (i.e. even a minor breach of the social contract entitled the aggrieved party to repudiate their agreement with the sovereign).…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The act or process of constituting; the action of enacting, establishing, or appointing; enactment; establishment; formation.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Political Theory

    • 4072 Words
    • 11 Pages

    A comparative analysis of Thomas Hobbes and Jean Bodin, and their concept of the church and state during the 16th, 17th century…

    • 4072 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Political Science

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages

    FACTS: Ronald Allan Kelly Poe, also known as Fernando Poe, Jr. (FPJ), filed his certificate of candidacy for the position of President of the Republic of the Philippines under the Koalisyon ng Nagkakaisang Pilipino (KNP) Party, in the 2004 national elections. In his COC, FPJ represented himself as a natural-born citizen of the Philippines and the place of his birth to be Manila Victorino X. Fornier, (GR 161824) commenced, on 9 January 2004, a petition (SPA 04-003) before the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) to disqualify FPJ and to deny due course or to cancel his certificate of candidacy upon the dissertation that FPJ made a material misrepresentation in his certificate of candidacy by claiming to be a natural-born Filipino citizen…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics