Preview

Social Contract by Rousseau

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1061 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Contract by Rousseau
Rousseau: The Social Contract

In Book I of the Social Contract, Rousseau suggests that towards a certain stage in the state of nature, people feel the need to bind themselves to one another. Individuals bind themselves to a larger community and form a social contract. Rousseau’s main argument in Book I is that the community that is formed by the gathering of individuals is not simply an aggregation of the interests of all the individuals that form it. It is a distinct entity –in a way, a distinct individual- that acts on its own. Rousseau defines this entity collectively as “the sovereign” and individually as “citizens”. All citizens are committed to this higher entity (the sovereign) and to each other. However, the sovereign is not bound by or committed to anything. Even though Rousseau implies that the sovereign is not bound by any force, he states that it is still obligated to act in the best interest of its citizens. The sovereign might be tempted to act as an independent existence and take measures considering solely its own interests. However, if it took a measure that would hurt its citizens, it would also be hurting itself. As a result, the sovereign is always supposed to act in the best interest of its constituents.

Insofar as the sovereign is limited to acting in the best interest of its citizens, individuals are also limited to acting in the best interest of the collective will and the sovereign. Some individuals might act in their own interest only, while still enjoying all the benefits and freedoms that the sovereign provides to them. Therefore, Rousseau suggests that individuals need to be “forced to be free”: that citizens need laws that force them to abide by the measures taken by the general will. Although individuals are able to follow any liberty and instincts in a state of nature, they become limited in the civil society, by rules that are based on reason and general will. This way, they become more noble and civil. By entering the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    For the past many years, people have been trying to figure out the relationship between the government and nature of man. The theories of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau about the connection between nature of man and the government have been debated for many years. These three philosophers have remarkably influenced the way our system works today. Although each theory had its flaws and merits, Jean Jacques Rousseau’s theory is superior in comparison to Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau’s makes it clear that “the only will dominating government should be the general will or the law.” The National Assembly of France used this principle in the sixth listed right in the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen which reads that “the law is an expression of the general will.” The general will, as Rousseau states, is for the best of the common interest of the country. The king will not always act in the best interest of his country, so it is imperative to form a constitutional monarchy that seeks to act in the best interest of the general…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau explains the philosophical underpinnings of the social contract as well as its suitable form. The suitable form is the ‘sovereign’ which according to Rousseau is the collective description the people who mutually agree to enter into a civil society. The individuals may have different needs and opinions, but the sovereign, as a product of the social contract, expresses the common will and good for the entire…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Penn Foster Exam 05002200

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages

    PLEASE NOTE: WE DO NOT ENDORSE CHEATING AND ENCOURAGE YOU DO GAIN KNOWLEDGE BY OWN…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After explaining how the state of nature evolved into civil society when people began to rely on each other for resources, Rousseau concluded that the social contact that made civil society possible is more important that the individuals who created it. Although civil society created inequality, it also created freedom, morality, and rationality, which make people human. On the other hand, Locke explained that the state of nature evolved into civil society because people wanted to protect their property and liberties. He concluded that civil society exists to benefit the people; if the present government fails to do so it should be overthrown.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas Madison asserts that the State has no say over a person’s relationship with the Creator, Rousseau only rejects certain State religions on technical grounds and eventually concludes that society should demand a significant religious test. It is surprising that given Madison and Rousseau’s uniform goal, a stable society, they should come up with such widely varying methods for achieving it. One may be tempted to suggest that, unlike Rousseau, Madison considers individual rights to be more important than the proper functioning of society. Upon closer examination, however, it becomes clear that Madison and Rousseau's general disagreement on State power stems from a more fundamental dispute over how society works. According to Madison, society exists with a certain power and then instills this power in the government, while Rousseau argues that it is the creation of a government which makes society materialize. These disparate views on the directionality of government and society directly lead to Madison and Rousseau’s other…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article that I read Philosopher Thomas Hobbes believed that people must surrender their freedom to a ruler. In the article, french philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau states that people should come together in societies and the solution was to form a social contract with general will or the common good.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Rousseau a Philosophe?

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Self preservation is the other key principle which Rousseau attributes to his idea of Natural Right. The desire to preserve oneself is the only thing that can drive one being to harm another, but only in extreme circumstances. Through the evolution of man and the occurrence of village festivals, ideas such as…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau proclaimed the natural goodness of man and believed that one man by nature is just as good as any other. For Rousseau, a man could be just without virtue and good without effort. According to Rousseau, man in the state of nature was free, wise, and good and the laws of nature were benevolent. It follows that it was civilization that enslaved and…

    • 2956 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    . .with the intention of better preserving himself, his liberty and property”. Individuals relinquish their absolute freedom and agree to follow laws because a government can protect one’s liberties far better than individuals. Thus, a free society is one in which its government ensures the basic rights of its citizens while maximizing their right to liberty. But what happens if a government neglects its purpose and passes laws that curtail both autonomy and natural rights?…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau says, “Man is born free, and yet we see him everywhere in chains” (p. 458). In your own words, explain what he meant. Do you agree with Rousseau? Does his claim apply to todays society? Defend your answer, then discuss why you chose this topic.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    world history notes

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages

    -Summary: States that the "chains" of civil society suppress the natural birthright of man to physical freedom & that the only legitimate political authority is the authority consented to by all the people. who have agreed to such government by entering a social contract.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    When a father punishes his son for missing his curfew the son instinctively reacts with anger and disbelief. This instinctive behavior is what inspired government to begin with. Rousseau explains in his piece that government grew from family. Family was the first form of government on this planet. The children were bound to their father because they instinctively knew that they needed him for protection and growth. To some extent family is still a government even today. When a human being is born, he or she is incapable of thinking and doing things for themselves, so they are taken into the custody of their parents. The parents nurture them and teach them all they can until they are ready to face the world on their own. The child chooses to obey the parents while they are young because they know that everything is being done for their best…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke Vs Rousseau

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Sovereign is set up to protect the rights of the people. They decide on laws on what is determined to be in the best interest of the general population. While what the Sovereign decide may not satisfy everyone, they satisfy the majority of the people rather than only a few. As a member of the Sovereign, they are taught to keep the best interest of the people and the state in mind, “As a member of the Sovereign he is bound to the individuals, and as a member of the State to the Sovereign,” (Rousseau). The Sovereign is set up to protect the rights of the individual but at the same time has to keep in mind how this would impact the society as a whole. Keeping the Sovereign loyal to both the people and the state will ensure that the people’s rights and liberty will stay intact because to keep the state in mind, the Sovereign will need to establish laws on behalf of the state to avoid any miscommunication between the people and state. There is the argument that if the Sovereign is loyal to both the people and the state are the people’s rights fully protected. However, having the Sovereign stay loyal to both will ensure that the people’s rights are always protected because establishing that political orders will establish laws that keep those rights protected rather than just stating that people have rights that shall be protected and not having anything in place to…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine yourself living in world with no social expectations, no competitions and no submission to the social hierarchy. Imagine yourself being free, peaceful, strong and powerful. Jean-Jacques Rousseau calls this state the natural state of man, the state that everyone should aspire to live in and that brings power to an individual. By exploring the natural state of man we are able to see how Jean-Jacques Rousseau developed a new understanding of the individual.…

    • 3155 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays