Preview

Pollan's Argument Against Racism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
903 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pollan's Argument Against Racism
human beings. King supports Pollan when he argues that speciesism will one day be viewed as harsh as racism because animals are treated differently and don't get to live a normal life like they deserve. Animals have the urge to live a normal life just like us humans, so why should humans take away that right. Pollan discusses how everyone has equal rights when he writes, "’Equality is a moral idea,’ Singer points out, ‘not an assertion of fact.’ The moral idea is that everyone’s interests ought to receive equal consideration, regardless of ‘what abilities they may possess.'" (Pollan 207). Yes, there is a difference between animals and pigs, but that doesn't mean animals like to feel pain, while humans don't. The one interest both animals and …show more content…
Pigs for example like to run around in mud, while children have a sense of being educated. These are the differences in which it's okay for each specie to do what they want, but morally when it comes to being treated in a different way for example in a harsh way because they are animals is ethically wrong. Same goes for racism. People are only distinguished as different due to skin color, but everybody is the same on the inside, everybody has similar desires. For example, humans don't want to be treated harshly or feel pain whether they are black or white. Everyone should be treated equally because yes there are differences between animals and black people and white people, but at the end of the day none of them want to be treated in a harsh way. That is one thing everyone has in common. King establishes that it's wrong to reach a good outcome using bad ways when he writes, “I have tried to make clear that it is wrong to use immoral means to attain moral ends. But now I must affirm that it is just as wrong, or perhaps even more so, to use moral means to preserve immoral ends" (King 175). King emphasizes that blacks deserve the same rights as white people and there shouldn't be laws that go …show more content…
Animals are species of this earth too and they shouldn't be treated like they are any less than humans. People don't realize what animals go through because animals are tortured and treated harshly behind doors, which is the reason humans don't understand their pain. If people were exposed to how animals get treated and how they get slaughtered they would know that it's wrong because they have rights just like humans do. Pollan emphasizes that equality between animals and humans is important when he writes, "To exclude the chimp from moral consideration simply because he's not human is no different from excluding the slave simply because he's not white" (Pollan 207). Animals are usually not talked about when it comes to equality because they aren't the same as humans, which is wrong because just cause animals are different than humans doesn't necessarily mean their existence or interest is not relevant. A difference in species like humans and animals is as arbitrary as a difference in skin color, which connects to discrimination as King talks about. Racism and speciesism both continue in our modern society and it needs to change. King expresses that segregation is wrong when he writes, "Hence segregation is not only politically, economically, and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the letter, Martin Luther King strategically argues to the clergymen that segregation laws imposed on African Americans are nothing more than unjust and immoral. He supports this claim by using a method of comparison of current events to historical and biblical events. King states that there two kinds of laws. There are just laws and there are unjust laws. King argues that a just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God, and an unjust law is out of harmony with the moral law. King’s argument is valid because he is right about the differences between just and unjust…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Dr. King’s speech, he states that even though the Emancipation Proclamation was signed in order for Negro slaves to be free, it is unfortunate that hundred years later Negroes are still suffering from discrimination. In his speech, Dr. King emphasize that this unfairness is seen in our society on a daily…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King stresses the urgency of immediate and ongoing action. His encourages active persistence on the part of everyone who believes in the fight for equality. King addresses the "myth of time" that is used to belittle his efforts. He knows that time alone will not achieve equality in our society.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a statement recently issued by yourselves concerning Mr. King’s behavior in Birmingham Alabama describing him as an outsider and extremist of his ways was inconsiderate as well as rude. Mr. King’s extremist ways, as you have put them, are an effort to better improve the physical and emotional consequences of segregation. I am writing in hopes that you might reconsider the current stance you have taken up regarding the issues at hand.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King states the ways the protests were handled emphasizing the unfairness of the monitoring. For example, he mentions the angry violent dogs that aggressively bite and attack six unarmed, nonviolent negroes. Secondly, the claim that the supposedly “break” such laws is emphasized by King claiming the reasons for this action. He declares that there are two types of laws. The ones that should be followed and the ones that are to morally wrong that they should not be followed; the just laws and the unjust laws. the segregation laws, for example, are unjust laws.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While humans often attempt to act more evolved than their primate relatives it is often obvious that both species continued to evolve at the same rate, each one adapted to meet their specific situation, but both retained similar primitive behavior that often shined through their complex adaptations. Superiority is oftentimes one of these traits that shined through, adult males often develop superiority complexes similar to those prevalent within the animal communities. Some of these people create inhuman systems such as Jim Crow laws to prevent people they consider threats to their position from being able to challenge their ideologies and practices. King addresses these ideologies and practices in his A Letter From Birmingham Jail where he…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the 1954 Supreme court decision outlining segregation in public schools improved because of the “Law’ and not because of “moral” acceptance. Dr. King is specific in describing two types of laws: the just laws, and unjust laws. Dr. King referred to St. Augustine that “an unjust law is no law at all”. He connected just laws to moral law or the law of God. He described an unjust law as a man-made code that does not kinship or is out of harmony with the moral law rooted in eternal or natural law. King makes the difference clear by describing an unjust law as not binding on the majority of people or itself. The majority follows a just law and minority as well, equal and distributed…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King uses syntax when he scribes his thoughts about just and unjust laws. In particular, he describes unjust laws as codes that are out of harmony with the moral law and not rooted with eternal law, and a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey, but does not make it binding on itself. Since he describes a just law as a man-made code that squares with the moral law or law of God and uplifts human personality, Dr. King is saying that a just law is much more preferable to our society (742). After telling about the difference between just and unjust laws, he explains to his audience, in his opinion, a way to break unjust laws. One way to do this is to bring awareness to the law and how it is unjust without breaking the law. Also a group of people can stand up against the unjust law by talking before a group of legislators or some form of court. He also tells us that some laws may be both just and unjust. He writes “Sometimes a law is just on its face and unjust in its application” (743). Laws like no parading without a permit, seems like a just law on the outside, but also tends to include peaceful protesting and boycotting. Another example is the inability to vote or segregation of schools and public places. Although African Americans have been affected by multiple unjust and just laws, they continued on their journey to gain equal rights in…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Society must protect the robbed, and punish the robber” (King 4). This is yet another statement from King that screams logic. Unfortunately, parts of society back then did not possess the logical capacity to comprehend this concept. In the days when segregation ran rapidly, society decided to throw innocent African American victims away in a putrid jail cell while allowing the real criminals to walk freely. King saw the major flaw in this logic, and marked it down in his letter. In sum, he insisted that society should assist those in need, and punish those who harm others in the name of…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kings theory of justice in society is knowing the difference from right and wrong. His theory as a black gentlemen in the south is to fight against unjust laws. According to King, it is morally acceptable to break an unjust law, because a law that is unjust is considered no law at all. King abides by that injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. He believed in civil disobedience; which meant, to break a law for a moral reason even if it is unjust. It is ethical to break a law if it is unjust, but after breaking it we need to redefine the law to make it morally acceptable to society in which it is just. Another aspect that King believed it was non-violent actions. Non-violent actions was more socially acceptable for the majority to do harmful actions to the minorities. For instance, if the blacks (technical term) protestors were violent against the whites it was considered unjust, but it was just or morally acceptable because the blacks are fighting against an unjust law which, King believes is acceptable in order to bring just amongst the two races.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) was passed in 1996 to safeguard medical information. Records previously were usually kept in file cabinets and were basically not protected. With the introduction of electronically transferring medical data, it became important to secure this information. HIPAA ensures how, when, where, and to whom this medical information can be distributed along with specific rules to follow.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In todays society many human right activists want fair and equal rights for their own being, however when it comes down to the animals wellbeing many are unaware about how they get treated. Animals have little rights in the world but there are many bills out there to trying to protect the animals life and its life in our future. Many people are trying to standup for the innocent animals that are locked up in cages, overbred and even forced to perform. Only if more of the population knew how animals were treated there would be less worrying about themselves and more on the animals that don't have a word to say.…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why should the rights that were fought for by our late independent heroes and civil right activists be extended to non-human animals that could not socially speak for themselves? Since animals do not have the capacity to personally fight for their rights, granting what humans had put in their blood for to enjoy to non-human animals will be a scenario of robbing Peter to pay Paul and hence an injustice to humans. Therefore animal rights movement is simply a misguided attempt to force people to grant animals the same qualities, needs and desires as human beings. While this movement is born out of kindness and sympathy, I think it is completely misguided because non-human animals are in actual sense, equal to human beings and hence do not deserve equal right as enjoyed by human…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals should not have rights also because animals don’t respect our rights. As humans if one…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays