Drugs are substances that change a person’s physical or mental estate. The vast majority of drugs are used to treat medical conditions, both physical and mental. Some, however, are used outside the medical setting for their effects on the mind. These are referred to as recreational drugs and many of them of are illegal in Australia. This is where the law is applied.
Illegal or illicit drugs are drugs that are not permitted by law; meaning people can’t use, produce, sell, or import them. There are even restrictions on the importation of certain ingredients used for production of drugs, such as pseudoephedrine which is used in the production of amphetamines.
Legalization of drugs in Australia is a concerned because it affects all of its citizen -people who use drugs who have family members using drugs; health professionals suing people for drug related matters and others. The strongest argument against legalization is that it would result in significant increases in drug use. The moral argument against legalization suggests the use of illegal drugs is amoral, anti-social and otherwise not acceptable in today’s society. The concern is that legalization would send the wrong message. (That the law is in favor of drug use)
An alternative to legalization is decriminalization which refers to a reduction of legal penalties, such as fines, or by diverting drug use offenders away from a criminal conviction. One argument against decriminalization is that it doesn’t address the black market & criminal networks of drug selling. The moral arguments noted may also apply to decriminalization is lesser penalties that may suggest that society approves drug use.
Drug laws in Australia are guided by both state and Federal laws and are extremely complicated to navigate with many things to be considered. Questions such as “what is drug possession” “what is a trafficable amount?” are some of the questions that may be asked.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Substantiating the contention with a barrage of statistics, Syvret adds legitimacy to the position of legalising the drug. Through opening the issue with the “war on drugs” in America costing “$46.05 billion a year in terms of enforcement,” he directly exposes the extent to which this issue affects their economy, compelling the reader to see the consequences of the prohibition as fact, rather than personal opinion. This idea is further reinforced through the “wage bloody war” experienced across the border of Mexico, as costs are almost eight times more than that of America’s with estimation close to $375 billion a year, implying that the risks accompanied with the prohibition of marijuana is a widespread issue, and that therefore, it is something Australia must be careful about. Syvret strengthens this idea through a current review of Australia’s cost of enforcement estimating “as high as $4.7 billion a year,” creating a sense of uneasiness of the exorbitant costs this drug places on Australia and its economy. Additionally, the excessive statistical evidence used by the writer emphasises that the issue is extensive, encouraging the Australian public that the current position of prohibiting marijuana is insufficient and must be changed.…
- 796 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the article entitled “Would Legalized Drugs Produce a Zombie Nation?”(Cederblorn and Paulsen, 332 - 334) written by Stephen Chapman. The author (Stephen Chapman) provides a clear details and analogy of the drug use and abuse in the American society. The article gave a picture of a theoretical view where the use of banned drugs is legitimized by the United States government. The unbelievable situation of having a legitimate way of circulating the proscribed drugs would create a lot of chaos in the communities and society in general.…
- 1127 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Illegal drugs include prescription drugs that have been dangerously modified and substances that are banned by law.…
- 1511 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
According to the Australian National Council on Drugs, the everyday Young Australian believes drugs are acceptable for the following reasons:…
- 135 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Many governments may struggle with whether to just decriminalize or legalize a drug entirely. Which is better for the government financially and more importantly the people? First we must understand the difference between decriminalization and legalization and the advantages and disadvantages. “Decriminalization does not mean that people can use drugs with impunity. But, possessing small amounts no longer lands the perpetrator with a criminal record or a jail sentence.” (Define Decriminalization) Before…
- 1422 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The liberal view on legalization reflects an assessment of the relative harms of drug use versus drug prohibition, and in that sense is similar to the libertarian calculus. But liberals put less weight on consumer sovereignty, and they are not as fundamentally suspicious of government prohibitions as are libertarians. Thus, for commodities viewed as substantially harmful (e.g., tobacco), liberals are willing to consider prohibition, but for commodities viewed as relatively benign (e.g., marijuana), they find prohibition excessive (Boyd 1998). Liberals agree on the fact that prohibition has many undesired consequences. These include the infringements on civil liberties that are an inevitable consequence of attempts to sanction victimless crimes; the corruption and violence fostered in foreign countries by U.S. attempts to enforce prohibition; the increased frequency of overdoses and accidental poisonings that results from the poor quality control in black markets; the increased property crime that results from elevated drug prices; and the violence that results because participants in black markets settle disagreements with guns rather than lawyers. Liberal legalizers argue, therefore, that the arrest and prosecution of drug users is ill-advised and that current…
- 1180 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
As drug use is mainly seen as an influence or choice, the function of legal and illegal drugs can be used for many different purposes. For example, drugs can be used for medical purposes for relieving pain and discomfort or for curing & preventing disease. It also can be used recreationally,…
- 1686 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The most prominent argument against the use of drugs is the harm it has on the users. Although drug use is potentially very harmful to the users the government should not be allowed to prohibit people from harming themselves. Many things people regularly take part in are equally as harmful as drug use such as “smoking tobacco, drinking alcohol, eating too much, riding motorcycles, having unprotected or promiscuous sex…(Huemer, Para. 5).” There is no way that the government can prohibit all those acts for it is not any of their business. One might argue that drug use is more harmful then those acts, they would be wrong in most cases because all of those acts lead to death which is as harmful as you can get. The Office of National Drug Control Policy claims that drugs kill eighteen thousand Americans a year while tobacco kills four hundred and forty thousand Americans per year. Another relevant statistic is obesity causes up to four hundred and twenty thousand deaths per year. Neither tobacco smokers nor obese people have been punished yet many drug users are imprisoned. Another point prohibitionists suggest against the use of drugs is that drugs harm one’s quality of life however many other things harm one’s quality of life such as dropping out of high school or working at the same job your entire life;…
- 979 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Eddie Maguire’s Opinion piece “Time for national debate on evil drug trade” in the Herald sun on April 1st 2012 is a logical piece which appeals to Australians as a whole and those who are particularly associated with drugs. This article was published after the devastating news on Ben Cousin’s relapse became a public affair and the idealistic view on the AFL became tainted. Throughout the piece Eddie voices his opinion by the use of inclusive language and appealing to the audiences fear and sense of safety. His tone although, varies throughout the piece, generally holds an accusing voice which aids in his perspective of drugs in Australia urgently needing to be decriminalized getting across.…
- 895 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In “Against the Legalization of Drugs,” by Peter de Marneffe, the argument that the use and possession of drugs needs to be decriminalized is made, because of the belief that the criminalization of drug use and possession violates the rights of citizens. In this paper, I will defend de Marneffe’s position by refuting a possible objection. Contrarians may claim that decriminalizing drugs will inevitably lead individuals to try harder and more dangerous drugs.…
- 573 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the arguments against legalization of drugs is what we have all grown up hearing which is “drugs are bad”. This reason has been said throughout most of our life and is what we learn in schools. However, legal drugs like alcohol and tobacco have caused more harm than illegal drugs. Another argument against legalization is that it would send mix signals to children. Drugs are bad and “just say no” have been sayings we have all learned growing up. However, if drugs were suddenly legal children would be confused. The rates of use can fluctuate in high school students with their confusion about drugs. Another argument against legalizing drugs is that the drug epidemic for late 1800s to 1900s ended because of society’s shift in attitude…
- 359 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Abuse of Illegal Drugs Ought to Be Treated as a Matter of Public Health, Not of Criminal Justice
"…the solution lies in prevention, which in turn is largely a matter of education and enforcement, which aims at keeping drug pushers away from children and teenagers."…
- 672 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Doctors see it as a disease that needs a medical approach as well as punishment from the law. However, on the other side prosecutors and law enforcement refused to see them as sick people. They felt as if this took away the accountability of the drug users. The author stated that “criminalization and medication are complementary.”…
- 679 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The author will attempt to briefly describe the philosophies of decriminalization, legalization and drug treatment. I will conclude with my opinion regarding the good and bad about these said philosophies.…
- 696 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the many problems in our nation today is the use of illegal drugs. Being fought against our own citizens, a national effort to eliminate drug production and use has failed leaving in its wake complete chaos. Assault, property crime, murder, corruption and many other things are burning through society fueled by the drug war's policies. In addition to these problems there are the initial problems that illegal drug users inflict on themselves and society; the same ones the drug war was supposed to eliminate. Prohibition is an old idea that is not attainable in a democratic society that values individual rights. Experiments with the prohibition of alcohol failed miserably and cost many people their lives. A form of regulated legalization of drugs, such as marijuana would be a middle ground that recognizes the inevitability of drug use and strives to make it as safe as possible.…
- 786 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays