When one wants to win an argument, they emphasize the good qualities of their side, while making the other side look inferior. …show more content…
“In May 1963, movement organizers assembled black children, some still in pigtails, to march through the streets of Birmingham and confront Bull Connor’s violent police force” (Sebastian, 1). Bull Connor did not disappoint, for he was ready with armed cops and attacks dogs. Several teens and preteens filled jail cells that night, returning to the streets the very next day (Sebastian, 1). King knew this violence would come, and he also knew how appalling child abuse is to anyone, regardless of race. King knew only the harshest cruelties would gain attention, which they did. After relentless marches, sit-ins, and various acts of civil disobedience, society began to change. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed which ended segregation in public places and discrimination in work habitats of not only race, but national origin, sex, and religion as well (History.com).
The Civil Rights Era is a perfect example of successfully magnifying the problem to create the desired effect, but if an entire era isn’t convincing enough, take the use of the word
Howell