Post Human Research Paper

Should We Become Post-human? The sole aim of the technological advancements in various domains has always been the simplification and betterment of our lives. Scientists, engineers and technicians spend their lives hypothesizing and experimenting in order to enhance all means of human life – whether in the medical, digital, electronic, or industrial fields – and make our lives easier to live. However, with the evolution of these advancements, a new view of life evolved as well. Scientists want to biologically modify the composition of human beings to create supernatural humans, while technicians and engineers aim as high as to incorporate robotics and humans together, creating a cybernetic organism, or a cyborg (Posthumanism, n.d.).
The enthusiasm these feel toward the awaited posthuman age is clearly evident in science fiction movies that are currently produced. An example of these movies is “Lucy”, which proposes the production of an artificial hormone that can naturally be found in small quantities in the body of pregnant women, to enable our full control over our brain and body: control over when we should feel pain or ecstasy, as well as the regulation of our body’s temperature, blood flow, cell division, and each other aspect of our materialistic body. Transhumanists buttress the use of inventions in order to improve the quality and abilities of human beings. They insist on the spread of these tools to all people regardless of their race, ethnicity, religion, social level, political preference, etc. (Bostrom, 2005). This enthusiastic view is accompanied with other views. Excited scientists and philosophers agree that the soul and the body are distinct from each other, and so the soul can be taken, manipulated and inserted into any body, which is the machine in the state of posthumanism (Pepperell, 2003). Moreover, the progressive biotechnological breakthrough that we’ve been witnessing in the last few decades refuted the original scientific idea of the human uniqueness. The current evolution in genetics, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence rebuke the idea of “exceptionalism” of human beings, and treat
This organizations “is dedicated to elevating the human condition” (About Humanity +, n.d.). First, this movement encourages the safe use of technology, where all the negative and positive consequences of the technological tools are thoroughly considered. Human enhancement within ethical and moral boundaries is its sole aim. Posthumanism is considered beyond the normal range. People with bodily inabilities are considered “abnormal” as well. Hence, Humanity + considers that the definition of “normal” is not a standard, and so we should use our creations and conclusions in all fields to enhance the quality of human life with considering the moral and ethical limits (About Humanity +, n.d.). Overall, this position seems logical and consistent, as it took into consideration the previously stated boundaries. However, it doesn’t discuss the major argument of human uniqueness, and doesn’t explain how it will resolve this issue, which makes it lacking, and demands further research and