Preview

precedent

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
931 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
precedent
Common Law Reasoning and Institutions
Question 1:

“in practice the doctrine of precedent does not constrain judicial decision-making; activist judges can always creatively interpret previous cases to reach the outcome they desire.”

Discuss.

Answer:

In considering whether the doctrine of precedent constrain activist judges like Lord Denning in making their decision, we should first examine the English legal system and how judicial precedents operates.

The lowest court of law in England and Wales, which deals with less serious crimes, is the Magistrates’ Court. The courts just above a Magistrates’ Court are County Courts and Crown Courts. Positioned higher in the hierarchy is the High Court. Any parties not satisfied with a decision made by the High Court may lodge an application for leave to appeal with the Court of Appeal. The court of last resort and the highest appellate court is the Supreme Court (formerly, the House of Lords ). Decisions in the higher courts bind the lower courts. In common law legal systems, a precedent is established in a previous legal case that is either binding on or persuasive for a court or other tribunal when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts. This is called “stare decisis” or let the decision stand. It provides at least some degree of certainty. This doctrine of precedent applies to all courts including the court of appeal, whose decisions bind all lower courts. The court is also bound by its own previous decisions except in the case of two conflicting Court of Appeal decisions or a later House of Lords decision or per incuriam (Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd). Until 1966, the House of Lords in the United Kingdom was bound to follow all of its previous decisions under the principle of stare decisis, even if this may create "injustice" and "unduly restrict the proper development of the law". This principle is adopted by conservative judges like Lord Simonds. Their rationale is that judges are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Unit 21 P1 and P2

    • 3188 Words
    • 13 Pages

    These cases set precedence in the House of Lords as they were upheld in court and nowadays they use them in the courts to make decisions regarding cases.…

    • 3188 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week1 Busn 420

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    At the heart of the common law system is the doctrine of stare decisis, which translates to “let the decision stand.” Stare decisis creates precedent and thus, when a court has decided a case in a particular way, future cases should be decided the same way. However, stare decisis will only apply if the facts of the case are substantially similar to the prior case. Precedent acts as a major guide for judges when hearing similar cases.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BUSINESS LAW QUESTIONS

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A. Stare decisis is a Latin phrase meaning "to stand on decided cases"; in other words, is a case precedent or statute, that may be binding or nonbinding, and will influence the outcome of future similar cases. It's so fundamental to our legal tradition, because it helps the courts to be more efficient, serving them as a guide, making law more stable and predictable.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    of philosophy can be seen with the court’s decision to overturn precedent that was interpreted in…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    paralegal

    • 1529 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Precedent is prior decisions of the same court or a higher court that a judge must follow. Stare decisis “ Stand by the thing decided” Related to the concept of precedent; Rule that a court should apply the same legal principle to the same set of facts and apply it to later cases that are similar…

    • 1529 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    P6 P7

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Persuasive precedents come from; Courts lower in hierarchy, Decisions of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and A dissenting judgement.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Stare Decisis Case Summary

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the interest of preserving the respect for the rule of law and cabin judicial discretion a principle of Stare decisis must be applied. This foundational principle in the U.S. legal system sets a base for favoring the adherence to precedent in order to establish a consistent and stable courtroom climate.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Quiz

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    | Incorrect. The use of precedent--the doctrine of stare decisis --permits a predictable, relatively quick, and fair resolution of cases. Under this doctrine, a court must adhere to principles of law established by higher courts.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    LA 245 Midterm 1

    • 4060 Words
    • 19 Pages

    The principle that precedent is binding on later cases is called stare decisis - “let the decision stand”…

    • 4060 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Student

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The definition of the doctrine of precedent is lower courts are bound by the decisions of higher courts within the same judicial hierarchy if the facts are similar. For example, in south Australian there are three tiered or layered court system. The lower layer is Magistrate court; the Middle layer is District court and the upper layer is the Supreme Court. The highest court is the high court of Australia. So if a decision made by the Supreme Court, the Magistrate court has to follow. Moreover, the Doctrine of precedent consists of binding precedent and persuasive precedent. Binding precedent mean is that lower courts must follow higher court’s decisions when the fact is similar. Persuasive precedent means is that if decision is made by a different judicial hierarchy, lower courts do not have to follow the decision, but encourage following it.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Review Sheet

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Stare decisis is a legal principle by which judges are obliged to respect the precedents established by prior decisions. "To stand by that which is decided."…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The theory of legal precedent has changed the face of the Criminal Justice System and Criminal Courts in many ways. Previously judges made decisions solely on what they believed, without mentioning existing cases. The decisions were only base on what they were told about the pending case, and with that information they provided a suitable conclusion. Today judges base their decisions on previous cases, to be able to justify their actions. Legal precedent is extremely beneficial to our Criminal justice system and our court system because it allows consistency, reliability and predictability within our decisions.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is often believed that the relationship between certainty and flexibility in judicial precedent has struck a fine line between being necessary and being precarious. The problem is that these two concepts of judicial precedent are seen as working against each other and not in tandem. There is proof, however, that as contrasting as they are on the surface they are actually working together to achieve one common goal.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Precedent means the process whereby judges follow the decisions made by previous judges in similar cases where the facts are of sufficient similarity. In deciding a case, there will be basic tasks, establishing what the facts are, meaning what actually happened, as well as how the law applies to those facts. The idea of judicial precedent is that once a decision has been made in a set of particular facts, similar facts in later cases should be treated in the same way. The rules concerning which courts are bound by which are known as the rules of judicial precedent, or stare decisis, this may provide consistency and predictability in the law.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It was not possible to lay down rules of law that would apply to every single case. Legislators attend to what commonly happens, although if the law be applied to certain cases it will frustrate the equality of justice and be injurious to the common good, which the law has in view.”…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays