Preview

Presidential Impeachment Trials

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1835 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Presidential Impeachment Trials
Presidential Impeachment Trials
Mandy White
Legal Methods and Process
LS 500-01
June 5, 2012

The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the impeachment trials of President
Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Bill Clinton and identify any ethical dilemmas associated with each individual case and whether or not criminal chargers were appropriate or not. Before delving into the trials here is a brief description of what impeachment is and how the process works. “Technically speaking, impeachment is the Senate’s quasi-criminal proceeding instituted to remove a public officer, not the actual act of removal. Most references to impeachment, however, encompass the entire process, beginning with the House’s impeachment inquiry”
(Henchey, 1999, para. 3). “The Constitution’s framers included impeachment as a method of removing officeholders who corrupted the government, endangered the constitutional order, or failed to uphold the Constitution in some deeply fundamental way” (Finkelman, 1999, p. 18).
However, technically speaking a government official could commit a crime and not be subject to impeachment on the other hand an actual crime does not have to be committed in order to be impeached. The Constitution stated two offenses that were mandated as impeachable offenses: treason and bribery. “Both ‘sell out’ the nation: They are not ordinary crimes but go directly to the functions of the government itself and to the nation’s fundamental security” (Finkelman,
1999, p. 18). Ethical dilemmas surrounding impeachment trials of United States Presidents. After researching the actions of President Andrew Johnson which led to his impeachment trial I found ethical dilemmas not only within the scope of his actions but also within the scope of the charges or lack of charges brought against him at the impeachment hearing. According to history,
Johnson’s actions were impeachable



References: Finkelman, P. (1999). The trials of presidential impeachment. Retrieved from http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publishing/insights_law_society/update231.authcheckdam.pdf Henchey, B. (1999, January 5). Lii backgrounder on impeachment. Retrieved from http://www.law.cornell.edu/background/impeach/impeach.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Generally speaking, there are three ways to remove a public official from office: resignation, recall, and conviction after impeachment. In Governor Bentley’s case, each of these options has major roadblocks.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch07

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The crime of bribery occurs when the bribe is offered—it is not required that the bribe be accepted.…

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case: US V. Nixon

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A grand jury returned indictments against seven of President Nixon’s White House staff members and political supporters of the President for violation of federal statutes in the Watergate affair,. The President on the other hand was named as an un-indicted co-conspirator. The Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski filed a motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure - Rule 17 for a subpoena duces tecum, a court summons ordering the President to appear before the court and produce tapes, documents and other tangible evidence relating to precisely identified conversations and meeting between President Nixon and his aides. The District Court initially treated the subpoena material as presumptively privileged, but then concluded that the Special Prosecutor made sufficient showing to justify a subpoena for production before trial. The District Court then issued an order for an in camera examination of the subpoenaed material, rejecting President Nixon’s contentions that the judiciary lacked authority to review his assertion of absolute executive privileged and the dispute between him and the Special Prosecutor was nonjusticiable as an “intra-executive” conflict.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How the Watergate Scandal Happened My first topic to be discussed is how the watergate scandal happened The watergate scandal involved president Nixon and five highly skilled thieves. This event in history consisted…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Inside the offices of the national Democratic Committee” (Presidential Impeachment Proceedings). That only showed what was before the scandal. What came afterward proved the corruption…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    How Did Watergate Scandal

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The piece of information invited great criticisms from the public and political opponents who wanted Richard Nixon and his associates in the government to be impeached from office. This followed an interrogation of the president’s staff members who had information concerning his…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    FRANK: Recall that in late 1998-early 1999 the Republican-dominated U.S. House of Representatives impeached President Clinton on charges of perjury; that is, lying about having sex with Monica Lewinsky, and obstruction of justice by withholding evidence.…

    • 3832 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    current first world democratic society because the people have a sort of impeachment power if the…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trump wasn’t in office a full ninety days before there was talk about impeaching him. This was in part due to his destructive policies, like the travel ban. A policy where he stopped travel from countries where he doesn’t have any pending business deals. Since trump has been in office ……

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It makes sense that Congress was hesitant about impeaching the president. Impeachment was a new process. Actually, some could consider impeachment to still be a new process in the present day because no president has been fully impeached yet. However, even though impeachment could still be seen as a new process, the checks and balances of present day are more well development. I also hope that if this situation happened in present day, citizens would take a…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to impeachment, the system of checks and balances is very effective. The president can be impeached by the House of Representatives. During the impeachment, the Chief of Justice sits a President of the Senate. So, this is a check on the executive branch. In impeachment, legislative branch holds the power. The legislative branch represents the people which provides a check upon itself and the judicial branch. As a result of the legislative branch holding most of the power, it allows the people to have a connected sense especially when it comes to voting.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Construction Practice

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Describe the events that led up to the case and discuss the importance of the…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. An officer has been charged with treason for selling main  documents to a newspaper.…

    • 999 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Senate convened as an impeachment trial as democratic discipline. What we're witnessing is People Power expressed in the institutional, yes, constitutional way. There is a time for citizens taking to the streets to demand reforms in government. There is also a time for citizens entrusting to democratic institutions the task of making government work the way it should.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    or willful misuse of power or willful misuse of discretion against any public servant and to inquire or cause an…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays