Preview

This is a presuasive essay on Capital Punishment. This essay has a pro-capital punishment stance. Argues against common statements used to challenge the death penalty.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
837 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
This is a presuasive essay on Capital Punishment. This essay has a pro-capital punishment stance. Argues against common statements used to challenge the death penalty.
Capital Punishment - Fair and Balanced

Capital punishment is a difficult issue to address and has been the subject of highly controversial debates over the decades. The United States Supreme Court decided in Furman v. Georgia that the death penalty was a form of cruel and unusual punishment. However, just three years later in 1975, the Supreme Court reversed their decision, and executions resumed under state regulation. The death penalty is considered the harshest from of punishment enforced today. The most common method used to implement this task is lethal injection; although, the electric chair is still used in some states. The large debate over the death penalty comes from liberal fanatics who use deception and falsehoods to further their cause.

Supporters of the death penalty consider capital punishment the only way for true justice to be executed for the severest of crimes. Supporters also claim criminals that commit such harsh crimes, including murder and rape, deserve to be punished to the fullest extent of the law. Preventing future crimes and deterring criminals from committing such harsh acts also play key roles in support of the death penalty. Concrete proof of deterrence alone is not a valid reason for capital punishment, nor is it the underlying principle in use by astute death penalty advocates. Criminals ought to be punished for their crimes committed and not merely to deter others. That said however, the death penalty unquestionably "deters" the murderer who is executed. Strictly speaking, this is a form of incapacitation; similar to the way a robber put in prison is prevented from robbing on the streets. Vicious murderers must be eliminated to prevent them from murdering again, either in prison, or in society if they should get out. Both as a deterrent and as a form of permanent incapacitation, the death penalty helps to prevent future crime.

The argument against capital punishment relies on myth, propaganda, and misplaced emotion. Many people

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    ACC/290 team paper

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty is set in place to punish individuals for the most violent crimes. Its purpose to keep the death penalty legal was to deter people from doing these horrible crimes. That attempt has failed terribly. According to a report conducted by the National Research Council, it was said that we could not depend on the death penalty to deter the effect of murder rates. “Claiming that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on murder rates are fundamentally flawed and should not be used when making policy decisions” (Radelet & Locock, 2012).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime is a major problem in our world today. Some people in our country live in fear that they will be the next victim of a crime; they could be robbed, raped, or even murdered. There are so many theories on how to stop crime. One of the theories is the use of the death penalty as a deterrent. There are a lot of issues that surround that idea that make the use of the death penalty just as bad as the accused committing murder. It is very contradictive, inconsistent, and unethical. Although some people believe that the death penalty deters crime, there are many arguments against it. For example, the costs are extremely high, racism is involved, and there are innocent people on death row to list a few.…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    (1) It prevents the individual from committing more crimes while they are incarcerated. B. [Attack the reasoning] Second, although capital punishment could be seen as a deterrent, there’s no data to support the claim. 1. From a scholarly essay written by John Lamperti, a professor of mathematics at Dartmouth university, the author does a statistical analysis on whether or not capital punishment deters murder.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Historically there is no clear evidence that the death penalty has decreased the murder rate or acted as an effective deterrent to murder. Capital punishment is a violation of natural rights. This is wrong for everyone who is involved: The prosecuted innocent, the criminals, the victim’s family and our nation. The death penalty does not guarantee safety for the innocent. Nothing good comes out of hate, and nothing good can ever come from capital punishment.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty in the U.S. has been and continues to be a controversial debate between citizens. Debate regarding the policies, laws and if the death penalty is the best way to punish offenders who commit violent crimes. The history of the death penalty in the United States dates back to the late 1970s. Between 1968 and 1977 there were no executions in the United States. In the Supreme Court case of Furman v. Georgia, the court ruled that capital punishment, as it currently employed on the state and federal level is unconstitutional (Jones, 2006). The Eighth Amendment states that any form of capital punishment qualifies as “cruel and unusual punishment.” The use of executions during this time was primarily based on race and was considered by the Supreme Court as “arbitrary and capricious.”…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his book” Should we Execute Those Who Deserve to Die?” Stephen Nathanson defines what he calls “argument from desert” the reasoning that “murderers deserve to die and therefore that the state ought to execute them”. He also proposes two statements, and explains that if one of the two statements could be established, then the argument from desert fails (Nathanson, 1987). In my essay, I will assess and establish one of the statements that Nathanson proposes to invalidate the argument from desert.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pojman Death Penalty

    • 2171 Words
    • 9 Pages

    I agree that the people who kill should be punished severely and depending on the case sometimes be put to death. I also agree that it is possible that the death penalty may deter people from killing because of their fear of death, but I don’t think it would deter as many people as Pojman may think it will. I am confident enough to believe that while someone is committing a cold-blooded crime like killing someone what is going through his or her head is not the possible consequence. They are usually acting out of passion or out of fear, not thinking about how this may put them in the electric chair. You can also look at the situation of criminals that get out of jail but when they get out they keep committing crimes because they are so into what they are doing they forget that they are going to be punished. That is the main argument against the idea of deterrence, along with the fact that here is absolutely no evidence in the states with the death penalty that there are fewer murders. Actually many states in the south have the death penalty and at the same time have higher murder rates than states in the northeast without the death…

    • 2171 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Furthermore, both proponents and opponents argue over crucial aspects about Capital Punishment like deterrence, morality and retribution, incapacitation and rehabilitation, the cost, and the potential risk of executing an innocent person. Capital Punishment, according to proponents, deters potential murderers because they will fear receiving the death penalty themselves. According to Jennifer C. Honeyman and James R. Ogloff, both are lawyers and James Ogloff has worked as a psychologist for thirty years, in Capital punishment: arguments for life and death, “deterrence is used to suggest that executing murderers will decrease the homicide rate,” or “general deterrence” (3). By executing the murderer, the death penalty ensures he or she cannot…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The death penalty has always been a controversial topic in the United States. It is outlawed in 16 states, but it should be abolished in all fifty states. The act of the death penalty is irrational, costly, inhumane, and religiously immoral. Taking an individual’s life, because he/she murdered someone is senseless and is not a good representation of the United States.…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    People who support the death penalty would argue that the death penalty deters people from murder because they are scared of being sentenced to death. It might scare some people, but the vast majority of murders would kill anyway, for most murders are not rationalizing their actions. Also, according to some being sentenced to life is a worse punishment than the death penalty for death would put them out of their misery. The life sentence is just as bad as a death sentence, so why have the death penalty at all? The death penalty is not beneficial. It only creates problems.…

    • 2248 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are few policies that produce as much debate, controversy and emotion in this country as the death penalty. Capital punishment has been around in this country since colonial times when people were killed for practicing witchcraft and today the death penalty is legal in 31 states. Since 1976, 1414 people have been executed in the U.S. (deathpenaltyinfo.org). People who favor capital punishment believe that if someone brutally take's another person's life then they should lose their own right to life. However, in taking a closer look at the death penalty, there are many problems associated with it such as that is is morally wrong, the botching of executions, the execution of innocent people, and the fact that it is a flawed system…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    <br>There is also the issue of Capital Punishment being a deterrent. But does the death penalty really deter crime? The death lobby wants you to believe the answer to that question is "yes." But, in fact, it is a resounding "NO."…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty was used as the ultimate punishment in the American courts, but is it necessary now? The death sentence is used when the offender killed another person with undisputed evidence. The death penalty was used more often during the early years of the United States and is even more accurate now. Even with all the modern technology we have today the death penalty is still hindered by a few factors. Death on humans is immsensely inhumane, even animals are killed at ease with no pain. The death penalty should be used less because of the murder rates are slowly dropping, Prejudice against the defendants, and the costs of the death sentence.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many people believe it is a needed part of our society to detour and control the crime rate of murders and rapes. In many other people 's opinions living with your unlawful actions in prison for the rest of your life would be a punishment greater than death; however, many people think the death penalty is justified for certain crimes. Taking another person’s life surely cannot be the answer to control crime. Is the death penalty justifiable for certain unspeakable crimes such as rape and murder, or a combination of both? Is capital punishment a deterrent and does it, in fact, lower homicide rates?…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does the death penalty really serve as a deterrent to criminals? In my opinion “No” it does not. If someone is going to commit a crime they usually do not think far enough ahead to think what the punishment might be if they get caught. The death penalty information center “took a survey of the former and present presidents of the country’s top academic criminological societies, 88% of these experts rejected the notion that the death penalty acted as a deterrent (death penalty information center, Aug.30,2010)…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays