Preview

Preventing juvenile Delinquency

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1931 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Preventing juvenile Delinquency
Preventing Juvenile Delinquency Introduction
A major problem in modern day society, of course, is criminals. It is believed by some that some people are born criminals, that they just have a genetic make up to do ‘bad things’, but for those who know better, we know this is nowhere near true. Criminals are formed by their environment, life experiences, and other situational factors. You can have the exact same two individuals and raise them in separate places and although they are genetically and physically the same, they will grow up and mature into totally different individuals because, let’s face it, our environment and society rounds us into the type of people we are. So what needs to be done? It goes without saying that criminals and delinquency needs to be stopped, it ends in thousands of pointless deaths state wide and property damages can reach into the millions. The goal is to specifically find out what breeds a criminal, or a delinquent, and try to alter or deter them from the life they are inevitably going to have; A life of crime.

Methodology
If delinquency is really a rational choice and a routine activity, then delinquency prevention is a matter of three strategies: prevention by convincing potential delinquents that they will severely punished for committing delinquent acts, then they must be punished so severely, that they never want to commit crimes again, or make it so difficult to commit crimes that the potential gain is not worth the risk. The first of these strategies is called general deterrence; the second is specific deterrence, and the third, situational crime prevention. General deterrence concept holds that the choice to commit delinquent acts is structured by the threat of punishment. If it believed that kids are going to get away with a crime, they are more likely to commit one. On the other hand, if they believe that their illegal behavior would result in apprehension and severe punishment, then only the truly



References: Saminsky, A. (2010). Preventing juvenile delinquency: Early intervention and comprehensiveness as critical factors. (02 ed., Vol. 02, p. 3). WEB Siegel, L. (2006). Juvenile delinquency . (9 ed., p. 587). Canada: Thomson Wadsworth.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Such deterrence emanates from life experiences with any further crime. However, if an individual is in fear to what punishment there is it is a possibility that it will only prevent him/her from committing a similar crime. A juvenile is set up to be punished by the state authorities’ knowing of their ordeal future misbehavior. An example of specific deterrence can be seen as the impact of the actual legal punishment on those who are apprehended. Specific deterrence can result from actual experiences with detection, prosecution, and punishment of…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Deterrence: Its primary goal is to discourage members of society from committing criminal acts out of fear of punishment. The most powerful deterrent would be a criminal justice system that guaranteed with certainty that all persons who broke the law would be apprehended, convicted, and punished, and would receive no personal benefit from their wrongdoing. Examples of the deterrence theory of sentencing is to torture the offenders and to sentence them to the death penalty.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Making an individual afraid to commit the crime again by threat of the same punishment or a harsher punishment.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prevention theory states that if the consequence of committing a crime outweighs the benefit of the crime itself, the individual will be deterred from committing the crime. Professor of law Scot and professor of psychology Steinberg said "first, the threat of harsh sanctions may deter future crime generally by discouraging youths from ever getting involved in criminal activity. Second, imprisonment prevents crime by incapacitating offenders. Third, imprisonment could reduce future crime by rehabilitating young offenders so that they will mend their criminal ways" Champion and Mays, Criminal Justice Professors at California State University said Deterrence presumes that punishing an offender will prevent him or her from committing further acts of deviance, or will dissuade others from law-violating behavior, and the transfer of juveniles to adult court should serve a deterrent function. The adult criminal justice system has a worse punishment than the juvenile court therefore it will serve as a better deterrent factor to stop the juvenile violent crime. Effective deterrence will be able to ensure safety because it will stop the crime before it happens. When the consequences are worse, there will be less crime; therefore Juveniles should be treated as adults in the criminal justice system if they committed a violent…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    You have the specific deterrence which is should reduce repeat offenses. Then you have general deterrence is a goal of criminal sentencing who have not been arrested yet, this is an attempt to turn crime.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pogarsky On Deterrence

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The article, “Identifying deterrable offenders: implications for research on deterrence,” proposed a unique framework from which to understand how deterrence operates. The article argued that most research has not adequately explored the proposition that deterrence operates for only a subgroup of the general population. In light of this, Pogarsky focused on more efficiently testing the effects of the certainty and severity of sanctions by dividing a sample into three subgroups and then analyzing their responses to a hypothetical situation. By doing this, Pogarsky aimed to specifically test a subgroup of the population, and how sanctions affect that group. The findings of his research contrasted many previous theories, however, numerous methodological problems can be found in his research. Consequently, these problems threaten the validity of his conclusion about the certainty and severity of sanctions on the deterrable subgroup of the general population.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Deterrence or public education. Imposing a penalty for a criminal act is also intended to deter that person from repeating the act. Also, when the penalties are well known and there is public dissemination of penalties for a particular crime, it is expected that others who might contemplate the crime would be deterred from engaging in the prohibited activity.…

    • 388 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Paper

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Another type of sentence given to a criminal is deterrence and in lamens terms it is the use of punishment as a threat to deter people from offending. Deterrence can be divided into three separate categories. “Specific deterrence, as used in criminal justice, refers to crime prevention achieved through instilling fear in the specific individual being punished such that they refrain from future violation of the law; also referred to as individual deterrence. General deterrence, as used in criminal justice, refers to crime prevention achieved through instilling fear in the general population through the punishment of offenders. Incapacitation is considered by some to be a subset of specific deterrence. Incapacitation aims to prevent future crimes not by rehabilitating…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The history of juvenile justice can be dated back to the 1760s when Blackstone classified a juvenile offenders as individual between 7 to 14 years old that understands they are committing a crime and has the intent to commit a crime. The juveniles were trialed, sentenced, and house with adult offenders. In the 19th century there were a shift and the best interest of the child were taken in to consideration. The best interest of the child was not to punish, but to rehabilitate which started the House of Refuge and opened up for more juvenile institutions.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deterrence theory suggests that if punishments increase, crime rates should decrease. General deterrence is the idea that by punishing one offender for a crime, other members of the community will be deterred from criminal behavior as well. Specific deterrence targets the individual; it uses punishment for one crime to deter the individual from preventing further crimes (Cullen and Johnson, 2016). Certainty and severity of punishment are the two primary concepts within deterrence theory. However, this theory assumes that every offender completes a cost-to-benefit analysis prior to committing crime.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Greenwood, P. W. (2006). Delinquency Prevention as Crime Control Policy. In P. W. Greenwood, Changing Lives: Delinquency Prevention as Crime Control Policy (p. 155). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deterrence Theory is often used as a goal to deter criminal sentencing by placing fear in the criminal of the punishment they could receive. This particular theory is to try and rationalize with the criminal of how freedom from jail could be beneficial to them oppose to receiving jail time for the crime they committed. The deterrence theory works as a three strike theory, in which the criminal’s sentence is revoked to give them a chance at straightening up their life, and not come before a judge on similar charges, and if they do, the sentence they could have received earlier will be imposed for the full amount of time give on their first infraction in front of the judge. In some case this theory may work, in other cases the criminal may feel impelled to commit crimes, thinking they could out-smart law enforcement officers, in this case the deterrence theory will not work for this criminal, and more than likely they will be incarcerated for the full sentence, or even more time.…

    • 702 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    History Of Deterrence

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Law enforcement teaches offenders that crime is punished. However, deterrence is the exclusion of commit a criminal act for factors as such as fear of sanctions or punishment. The history of deterrence begins by the end of the 1700s in the work of Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham, but the interest in deterrence and rational choice theory developed by the mid-1960s. Specific deterrence view that if experienced punishment is severe enough, convicted offenders will be deterred from repeating their criminal activity. However, this theory states that people seek pleasure and avoid pain ( Weinrath and Gartrell, 2001). Both authors discuss that the length of punishment affects the offender to commit the crime again. In other words, specific deterrence…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deterrence theory suggests that a person will not commit a crime if the perceived punishment outweighs the benefit they receive from committing the crime. The punishment usually has three components. The punishment must be swift. The punishment must be certain. The punishment must outweigh the benefit. The punishment must be swift, so the offender knows that they are being punished for. The offender is less likely to commit the crime if they believe they are certain to be caught and punished. If the punishment is less severe than the reward, then the offender has more incentive to commit the crime.…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Punishment:When a crime is committed many may wonder why it happened, but most everyone believes that the person that committed the crime should be punished. The concept of justification for punishment is to deter deviant behavior. Retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation and societal protection are the four justifications for punishment currently used in today 's society. These four forms of punishment are used in today 's society in an attempt deter criminal activity and to lower crime rates. Research of the four justifications of punishment will reveal which type of punishment deters crime most effectively as well as if the consequences of punishment provide any benefit for criminals and society.…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays