Preview

Price Gouging In Justice By Michel J. Sandel

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
759 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Price Gouging In Justice By Michel J. Sandel
Justice
What is justice? How and where should the notion of justice be reflected? These are permanently essential questions in a society. In book Justice, Michel J. Sandel uses the example of price gouging In the midst of the disaster caused by Hurricane Charley, the standard of granting the Purple Heart medal and the financial bailout for the economic crisis to take these questions and the reflections on them in front of the readers.

In Michel’s view, the case of price gouging concerns about two approaches towards justice, namely, the welfare approach and the freedom approach. Another approach, which is brought out by using the story of the purple heart, is the virtue. According to him, these three approaches
…show more content…
As its name demonstrates, it focuses on the distribution of welfare within the society and it aims at maximizing the welfare. In the real world, some governments primarily treat the welfare achievements as economic achievements. However, the word ‘welfare’ does not only mean the economic prosperity, but also happiness, health, and social well-being are included. In this way, the disagreements about which aspect inside the welfare approaches should we focus could be a latent problem. Besides, it is hard to value the compensation between the losses and benefits under the different subcategories of welfare. For example, if the government wants to implement a law which would extend the maximum working hours, then a lower level of happiness and health could be predictable, in other words, how could we integrate the very different aspects of welfare into one convincing standard? Yet difficulty not only rises from inside, this approach may be very against the virtue approach in some circumstances. If utilitarianism is adopted, where the gross happiness is the indicator of welfare, the information of who gains and who losses will still be missing. This is in huge contradiction with the notion that justice means the people get what they deserve, which is believed by …show more content…
In the book justice Michel points out that there are two rival camps of freedom, one is laissez-faire camp and the other is fairness camp. The former one prefers more liberal ideas that stand firmly with free market and the avoidance of government intervention of economic affairs. While the other camp favors more equality and fairness. This camp requires the government to use legislative and administrative methods to reduce the inequality in the society and ensure the equal opportunity of success. In this way the appearance of fairness and justice may be very different for the two sides. In the case of price gouging, the laissez-faire groups may criticize on authorities’ intention to intervene the market, saying that this kind of price gouging is fair. While the fairness camp would argue that render the poor people in shortage of critically important necessities, and at the same time the rich people could enjoy them is an injustice. It is hard to say which justice is the ultimately ideal one, the choice between the two lays on the preference of the citizens, government traditions and could be influenced by the persistently changing relevant

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chapter four in Sandel’s book “Justice” talks about markets and morals. In this chapter we consider the morality of paying people to perform different types of work such as fighting wars and bearing children. The question that stands is whether there should be a market, when money is involved, to the aspect of morality. One good example that Sandel portrays in this chapter is “Pregnancy for Pay.” Thinking through the rights and wrongs in this example helps clarify the differences among leading theories of justice.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means.” It believes that outcomes as a result of an action have a greater value compared to the latter, the morally right action is the action that produces the most good. It also states that the most ethical thing to do is to take advantage of happiness for the good of the society. This normative theory considers the overall good for all people and not just a single person.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice In Beowulf

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Dr. Martin Luther king once said, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” (Ali B. Ali-Dinar; Ph.D.) Justice! What is justice? The quality of being just; guided by truth reason, justice and fairness. The portrayal of justice is an eternal controversy that has developed over time from ancient civilizations to modern democracies, Not only portrayed overtime but though mediums of media and lit, earlier in the development of literature justice was depicted to be carried out in a more hero fashion meaning a person coming into a conflicting situation and solving the conflict or bring justice to light under his or her conditions therefore adopting a heroes attributes and overall distinction in the public eye as an enforcer of justice…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article, “Strengths and Weaknesses of Utilitarianism”, Louis P. Pojman explained the grounds on which utilitarianism has been attacked and showed some possible response to its defenders which imply his positive attitude towards utilitarianism [1] . In order to argue that thesis, Pojman’s one important premise is the response to the no-rest objection. He believed that the agent should aim at maximizing his or her own happiness as well as other people’s happiness and is best not to worry much about the need of those not in our primary circle.[1] .…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the aftermath of Hurricane Charlie in 2004, a debate was waged regarding alleged price gouging that took place and whether it was justifiable or not. On one side of the argument you have people who were in favor of the free-market concept and that vendors/retailers should be able to charge whatever the market will bear for their goods and services. On the other side were the people who supported price gouging laws and the government’s role of controlling such instances in the wake of tragedies such as Hurricane Charlie for the betterment or welfare of society as a whole. It is my opinion that the behavior of the vendors/retailers who were gouging these people was morally unacceptable and I will discuss it further in this paper.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justice with Michel Sandel

    • 2049 Words
    • 9 Pages

    References: Episode 01 - Justice with Michael Sandel. (n.d.). Justice with Michael Sandel - Online Harvard Course Exploring Justice, Equality, Democracy, and Citizenship. Retrieved June 12, 2012, from http://www.justiceharvard.org/2011/03/episode-01/#watch…

    • 2049 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice is the most complex word to ever befall mankind. Some people define it as the act of fairness, others believe it to be truth, reason, and fact all wrapped up in one. In the book, “To Kill a Mockingbird” by Harper Lee, justice proves why it is not so easily understood when a town unjustly convicts a man of a crime he did not commit. When personally deciding what justice means we can take three basic observational truths to narrow down our search. We must be able to decide what justice is to us, what the majority rules justice as, and take into account what the opposite of justice is, injustice.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virtue is “attitudes and dispositions, qualities of character which a good society depend on” (Sandel, 2004, p. 20). It is the approach that examines the sentimental frenzy of outrage that a moral issue like price gouging spurs. Much of the indignation is grounded in the perception that greed is a vice, and what angers people has less to do with welfare and freedom, and more to do with the greed of those who exploit their neighbours for their own gain (Sandel, 2004). While supporters of laws that ban price gouging argue, "although laws cannot ban greed they can restrain its most brazen expression” (Sandel, 2004, p. 8), others may contend law should not favour certain attitudes over others (Sandel, 2004). Evidently this third idea does not contain the same degree of objectivity as welfare and freedom does, as it is based on acceptance of normative virtues and vices. For example, certain attributes such as greed, in context to price gouging after Hurricane Charley, and failure, by Wall Street in the financial crisis of 2008-2009, are perceived negatively by society. This is turn complicates the predicament, as citizens simultaneously think greed and failure should be punished but judgements of virtue should remain separate from law (Sandel,…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Motorcycle Helmet Law Debate

    • 3284 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Sandel, Michael. “Justice: What’s the Right Thing to do?” New York, Farrar, Straus, and Groux, 2009.…

    • 3284 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    If everyone acted in an effort to promote the greatest good for the greater number of people our universe would exist with a utilitarian state of mind. Although, when one looks at this statement on the surface without further analyzing it, most would assume that existing in a universe where everyone seeks the happiness for the greatest amount of people that it would be greater one to live in. Although, surface wise we can make this assumption, everyone’s definition of “happiness” varies, for some happiness is defined by monetary objects and for others happiness is not determined through any tangible element.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism says that the moral and ethical thing to do is that which provides the most happiness or the least unhappiness to society. Sitting in class listening to the lecture on the moral theory of Utilitarianism it first sounded like the best moral theory ever. However as the classes continued and we learned more and more about this theory my opinion quickly changed. In this paper I will defend the idea that Utilitarianism is a failed moral theory.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theory of Justice

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Within this essay, the Theory of Justice will be broke down. It will lay out some personal information on John Rawls. It will give the principles of the theory and explain what they mean. It will also explain how the principles of these theories differ from traditional utilitarianism. Lastly it will show how justice is defined by modern criminal justice agencies and other entities involved in the criminal justice system and how it differs from security.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    as readers, come closer to a definition of justice.Three definitions of justice are presented: argued…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Welfare

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Virtue ethics would say that welfare is good when truly needed and whether or not that person will take responsibility in the welfare they receive. For example, if a person says they cannot work due to being burdened with children, should this mother receive welfare? There are millions of mothers out there not using assistance and raising their children, no matter the number and ages of…

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Welfare State

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Welfare State is the concept in which government plays a key role in protecting and promoting the economic and social well-being of its citizens, based on the principles of equal opportunity in the distribution of wealth and public responsibility for those who lack the minimal provisions for a good life, for example good health, education and basic income (Abercrombie and Warde 2000). Is it the responsibility of a government to provide for its citizen, what about the cost, because it can lead to ever-increasing public spending that the government may find difficult to sustain. According to Abercrombie and Warde (2000) the term ‘welfare state’ was invented, following the Second World War when Social policy was developing.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays