Preview

Theory of Justice

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
972 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theory of Justice
A Theory of Justice
Within this essay, the Theory of Justice will be broke down. It will lay out some personal information on John Rawls. It will give the principles of the theory and explain what they mean. It will also explain how the principles of these theories differ from traditional utilitarianism. Lastly it will show how justice is defined by modern criminal justice agencies and other entities involved in the criminal justice system and how it differs from security. John Bordley Rawls is one of the most important philosophers of the twentieth century. He was born the son of William Lee Rawls and Anna Abel (Stump) Rawls on February 21, 1921, in Baltimore, Maryland. Rawls received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Princeton University in 1943. During World War II, he served in the military, stationed in the Pacific. He attended Cornell University for a year from 1947–1948 and earned a doctorate from Princeton in 1950. In 1949, he married Margaret Warfield Fox, with whom he had four children.
In A Theory of Justice, Rawls begins with the statement that, ‘‘Justice is the first virtue of social institution,’’ meaning that a good society is one structured according to principals of justice (1998). John Rawls states that when a person is covered in the veil of ignorance, a society without his/her own status known must begin in that society. They must provide a place that they could relate to for someday they may have bad luck and end up as a person on the lowest end of the ladder in society. This is one way to have a just and fair society for all to live. A place where status does not matter and no one would ever feel bad for the situation they are in.
Rawls goes on to decide the necessary principles of justice that a good society may be based upon and using these as a foundation to build from. There were three principles addressed in the theory. The first principle addressed is the principle of the greatest equal liberty. This means each person is to have an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Rawls’ Fairness Approach is an appropriate ethical framework to use when assessing this dilemma. This approach questions if everyone involved is being treated fairly (is there favoritism and discrimination?). The Fairness Approach examines how fairly or unfairly the actions of an individual or group distribute benefits and burdens everyone else. With this approach, consistency of treatment among persons is key. The only insistence when treatment must differ is if there is a morally relevant difference between people (Andre, Meyer, Shanks, Velasquez, 1989). There are three different kinds of justice -- Distributive, Restorative, and Compensatory. Distributive justice focuses on the benefits and burdens evenly distributed amongst society’s…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Pledge of Allegiance is an honorable and commendable mantra. It concludes with, “one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” Justice in the former reference is inclusive for everyone, an entitlement, granted upon birth. John Rawls position of justice is that “everyone should be treated equally and as fair as possible”. Mr. Rawls position parallels the Egalitarian theory of equality and mutual respect. This isn’t necessarily the practice because contrary to the hope for multiple factors are factored in to the outcome.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of justice are also referred to in the article. These theories utilize concepts by John Rawls which include ideas on how to “create an environment of opportunity and access by all to the most comprehensive range of prospects” (Colin, 2012, p. 444). This theory can lead to a society where individuals are given opportunities to succeed.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I also think that Rawls’s theory of justice is a good one. But I doubt if this can be applied in reality. As everyone in our society has his/her own role or position. For example, I am a student, and you are a professor. As a student, I always want to do less work and have good grades; while as a professor, you would like students to study hard. So when come to the decision of what is justice, we will have different opinions. Same as when governor or some authorities define the concept of justice, they will have their own version of justice. As long as we people live in a society, we will have different status, and this will definitely affect our idea of justice and the regulation to govern the society. I also doubt if we really have the original position or how to realize this position. As long as people are conscious, they are always remember or know who they are and what they do and their position in the society, unless they lose their memories. Even the most fair person we believe cannot totally ignore his/her position when…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls bases his Theory of Justice on the intuitive conviction that justice as fairness is the first virtue of social institutions. He argues that in order to ensure fair distributions of advantages in society, a workable set of principles are required in order to determine how institutions ought to distribute rights and duties and to establish a clear way to address competing claims to social advantages. The second principle that Rawls develops stipulates that economic and social inequalities are justifiable so long as the requirements of fair equality of opportunity have been met and if they benefit the worst off in society. Rawls argues that the requirement of improving the conditions of the worst off, known as the Difference Principle,…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Rawls’ A Theory on Justice establishes standards by which we may evaluate justice in society. In assessing the United States in light of the Rawlsian principles of social justice, it is evident that America falls short of these standards, and yet this discord tolerated in America. While this incongruity does in fact affect the lives of many Americans, particularly the underpriviledged, in practice very little is done to lessen inequality so as to achieve the Rawlsian ideal of social justice in America.…

    • 2769 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From the moment of publication of “A Theory of Justice” in 1971, John Rawls is considered having worked out a thorough theory of social justice with his “justice as fairness” principle. In his work, Rawls presents two basic principles of justice that he considers to be the foundation of our society. The first principle states that everyone has the same exact rights and freedoms as anyone else. The term…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The issue of distributive justice is relevant in our society due to current thoughts on economic inequality in politics. The political philosophers John Rawls and Robert Nozick have differing views when it comes to the topic of distributive justice. This analyze the positions of John Rawls and Robert Nozick, finding that Nozick’s view of distribution is preferable to Rawls’ difference principle because people deserve to keep what they earn and their earnings should not be taken away from them because that would be a violation of their personal liberties.…

    • 1823 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    John Rawls and Robert Nozick

    • 3081 Words
    • 13 Pages

    John Rawls and Robert Nozick both present theories of justice, their views are very distinct and on some level similar. Rawls theory comes from a utilitarian view, utilitarian is a doctrine that actions are right if they are useful or for the benefit of a majority on the other hand Nozick’s theory is based on John Locke’s ideas of natural rights.…

    • 3081 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary goods will not be of equal value to every individual. Though the goods are the same (liberties, rights, opportunity etc.) the usefulness is going to be different depending on the situation of the individual. The value of any primary good is a function of the means that individual has at his disposal of making the most use of that primary good (Young and Rawls). Therefore, those with greater means will be able to make better use of their primary goods that are guaranteed for all by the conception of justice that we arrive at in the original position. Rawls then places the onus on individuals by claiming that it is up to them to align their expectations with their current situations to adequately reflect “the all-purpose means they can expect, given their present and foreseeable situation” (Rawls 189). Therefore, if an individual lacks the “all-purpose means” to secure his preferences, then it is that person’s responsibility to adjust his preferences so that he will be able to achieve realistic goals given his circumstances (Young; Rawls 189-93). This is to illustrate the fact that a conception of justice is not unjust just because citizens hold unrealistic expectations. Although this seems perfectly reasonable, it poses one problem that Rawls was trying to avoid from the outset. The expectation that citizens will…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Rawls Research Paper

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The two most significant philosophers on the principles of society structure are John Rawls and Robert Nozick. John Rawls’ ideas of a fair and just society are based on two main principles. These two principles make up his system of justice and incorporate welfare liberalism. In the first place there is Rawls Liberty principle. This principle can be explained as each individual having the right to equality within their society. Allowing basic equality in society such as the right to vote, freedom of speech and freedom to choose a religion is how western society is today. Secondly there is his Difference principle. This principle describes how the disadvantaged can take advantage of opportunities that might otherwise be unavailable to them. It also demonstrates how economic differences can be minimised within society. For example all people within a society have a conscience and can help those less fortunate as they may one day find themselves in a similar position (Kukathas, & Pettit, 1990). On the other hand Robert Nozick has a different view of the structure of this type…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rawls And Nozick

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In a broad sense, both Rawls and Nozick agree that the legitimacy of a just society is highly dependent on the emphasis of liberty for its citizens. For Rawls, it is the first principal of justice, and though he presupposes equal liberty as a basic right for each person, he makes a point to prioritize its importance. Rawls outlines some basic liberties, including political liberties, equal treatment under the law, and the freedom to hold personal property (Rawls, 677). Nozick agrees with this emphasis on liberty, adhering to its presence as fundamentally important in a just society. He takes Rawls’ inclusion of personal property even further, making it the centerpiece of his argument by demonstrating its primary standing in a just society…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rawls defines a just society as one that “everyone accepts and knows that the others accept the same principles of justice” (Rawls, 4). He understands that each man has a different conception of justice and that men will disagree on what…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In establishing this theory of “justice as fairness”, Rawls focuses on two key principles. The first principle refers to the importance of the protection of basic liberties. Rawls believes that the security liberties will be essential to those present in the original position because they are self-interest individuals. The uncertainty of one’s future holdings and position within society is a determinant of the safeguard of these liberties. Whether one will be placed in the top class or be less fortunate is undetermined. Therefore, Rawls claims that by human nature, precaution will be taken to ensure that liberties are distributed equally. This working principle of society ensures that the liberties of individuals will not be compromised. The second principle that Rawls claims…

    • 937 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this world of high income and social disparity between countries, cities, or even within the domestic territory, social justice seems remote and unachievable. To John Rawls, however, social justice is in fact realistically utopian and it is achievable.…

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays