Preview

Primary Source Analysis- Sun Tzu's the Art of War

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1227 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Primary Source Analysis- Sun Tzu's the Art of War
| | Primary Source Analysis- The Art of War | Dr. Chiasson, HI224 | Kavinaath Sriskandarajah | |

|

The Art of War was published by a Chinese military general named Sun Tzu during the Warring States period between 403-221 BCE. Sun Tzu’s The Art of War has been translated and published in English multiple times in the 20th century; the most notable translations were published in 1910 by Lionel Giles and in 1971 by Samuel B. Griffith. Giles’ original translation of The Art of War serves as this paper’s reference point due to the fact that Griffith’s rendition only adds insightful commentary and minor revisions regarding the choice of words used in Giles’ work. This paper will briefly discuss The Art of War’s significance regarding the meanings and effects that the document intends to invoke in its readers. Additionally, there will be a succinct discussion suggesting that modern Chinese military doctrine, within the specific context of Mao Zedong’s People 's War doctrine, is largely inspired by ideals presented in Sun Tzu’s Art of War
The Art of War is a military text composed of multiple sections that discuss military tactics without restricting them to specific situations. This allows for individuals, such as Mao Zedong, to create their own military doctrines based upon The Art of War’s teaching. In a 1968 interview, Mao Zedong admitted to having read Sun Tzu 's The Art of War before writing his own works on military tactics from 1936 to 1938. Sun Tzu’s diction indicates a serious tone as shown by The Art of War’s succinct sentences that emphasize decisive action. Sentences such as “There is no instance of a country having benefitted from prolonged warfare” and “In war, then, let your great object be victory, not lengthy campaigns” candidly highlight the importance of thorough military planning and sharp execution.
According to D.C. Lau, a prominent sinologist from the University of Hong Kong, The Tao Te Ching written by Lao Tzu, during the



Bibliography: Giles, Lionel. The Art of War by Sun Tzu Pax Libbrorum Publishing House, 2009. Jencks, Harlan Junbo, Zhang and Yao Yunzhu. "Differences between Traditional Chinese and Western Military Thinking and their Philosophical Roots." Journal of Contemporary China 5, no. 12 (1996) Loewe, Michael and Edward Shaughnessy Mair, Victor. Tao Te Ching Lao by Lao Tzu. New York City: Bantam, 1990. -------------------------------------------- [ 1 ]. Zhang Jhunbo and Yao Yunzhu. "Differences between Traditional Chinese and Western Military Thinking and their Philosophical Roots." Journal of Contemporary China 5, no. 12 (1996), pg 213 [ 2 ] [ 3 ]. Lionel Giles. The Art of War by Sun Tzu Pax Libbrorum Publishing House, 2009, pg 3 [ 4 ] [ 7 ]. Lionel Giles. The Art of War by Sun Tzu Pax Libbrorum Publishing House, 2009, the Art of War [ 8 ] [ 9 ]. Lionel Giles. The Art of War by Sun Tzu Pax Libbrorum Publishing House, 2009, pg 1-2 [ 10 ] [ 11 ]. Michael Lowe and Edward Shaughnessy. The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 BC. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pg 616 [ 12 ] [ 13 ]. Harlan Jencks. ""People 's War Under Modern Conditions": Wishful Thinking, National Suicide, Or Effective Deterrent?" The China Quarterly no. 98 (1984), pg 312 [ 14 ]

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Written by Chinese tactician Sun Tzu, the Art of War presents the basic principles of warfare and gives military leaders advice and instructions on when and how to fight. The Art of War is written in a very simple and direct manner. Sun Tzu’s work can easily be grasped and his principles understood. There is however a strong sense of morality required to achieving success with these principles. Approached in a holistic and integrated way, each principle is interlocked with the others to form a sum greater than its parts in a direct and concise…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essays by Ambrose, Broyles, Hedges, Kudo, and Styron collectively discuss War in varying contexts, highlighting the effects both before and after war. Some articles intersect on the supporting the idea of another, while others clearly hold opposing views.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Male military honor and training d. Military prowess matched only by China 4. Political institutions and internal conflict a. Reasons for internal tension i. Inadequate government organization ii. Powerful elite dispossesses farmers iii. Increasing power of military commanders b. Civil wars begin C. Emperors, authoritarian rule, and administration 1.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz's Theory Of War

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While many scholars attempted to theorize war in human history, only few were credited for constructing consistent theories on which people could base and further their understanding of war and warfare. Those include Greek Thucydides, Chinese Sun Tzu, and Indian Kautilya all three from 3-4th century BC; Prussian Carl von Clausewitz and Swiss Antoine-Henry Jomini both from 19th century. All of those prominent theorist had a lot to offer and therefore had great influence on our thinking in war, warfare, and strategy. However, Clausewitz’s theory offers more insight if one carefully and purposely studied the “paradoxical trinity” identified in his…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz, C. On War. Michael Howard and Peter Paret, eds. and trans. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.…

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military theory spans centuries of conflict all across the world. As such, military theorists have written in a variety of military climates, varying from the absence of gun powder to the presence of nuclear weapons. However, some military theories are transcendent. Some elements of Sun Tzu and Clausewitz are eternally wise. While their similarities may become universal truths, their differences are equally worthy of study because, it is in the differences where choices are made. Sun Tzu and Clausewitz agreed that war is chaos, military action is a tool for diplomatic goals and, as such, the results of warfare are not final. Their differences lie in how they advocate for waging war. The style and preparations for war contrast. This is where…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    SUBJECT: “The Western Way of War” by Geoffrey Parker, in The Cambridge History of Warfare . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005, 1-11.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    History of Math in Warfare

    • 1961 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3. Gabriel, Richard A. & Metz, Karen S. “A Short History of War: The Evolution of Warfare and Weapons.” Professional Readings in Military Strategy, No. 5. (1992). Web. 2 March. 2013…

    • 1961 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Clausewitz, C. On War. Michael Howard and Peter Paret, eds. and trans. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout history, literature has glorified war as a romantic event, where men won honor through acts of heroism. Many novels have been written to this effect. What is war, really, though? The one fact that people seem to forget is that no matter how just or righteous a cause is, war only produces death and destruction. Most war literature is about generals winning their glorious campaigns. Not often is the story told from the viewpoint of the common soldier who is fighting and dying. Few books show this side of war, the ugly…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The translation of the "Sun Tzu: The Art of War" ancient Chinese text has been given by many different writers. Samuel B. Griffith, Brigadier General, retired, U.S. Marine Corps; is a proven strategist that studied the English commandos…

    • 2202 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Ooda Loop & Hema

    • 5524 Words
    • 23 Pages

    This is not a reworking or rewording of any historical master’s writings, nor some kind of new Rosetta Stone, there is nothing new under the sun and to think otherwise is a fallacy [1]. This short paper simply describes the decision making process that all combatants make; the feedback cycle between decision-maker and the environment, how we can use this model as a tool to aid and improve our actions in the fight and in scholarly interpretations. The OODA Loop touches upon an astounding amount of pertinent concepts of fighting (and warfare). Within the model speed, power, accuracy, initiative, the Reactionary Gap, and Situational Awareness are covered outright or by proxy. It only makes sense to attempt to aptly apply it’s principles to Historical European Martial Arts, as the data and teaching of it is already present under different terminology in the period sources. I am all for more powerful and effective tools in my proverbial MEYER kit bag and as this model has been hailed as a highly focused guidance for effectively applying a multiple of Sun Tzu’s principles in The Art of War [2]. It may be the missing mental link for some practitioners to fully grasp what the Fechmeisters were talking about.…

    • 5524 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This research paper examines Sun Tzu’s Art of War with emphasis on his indirect approach theory to defeat one’s foe. Then by using this theory as the analytical construct, the study determines the viability and applicability of his military…

    • 5347 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sun Tzu, Roger T. Ames Translator, The Art of War, Ballantine Books, New York, 1993, U101S9348/355.00951…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Usa Iraq War

    • 2565 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Following the military achievement of the US in Afghanistan, the US focused its attention on Iraq in order to topple Saddam Hussein. The Iraq War was a conflict that took place with the invasion of Iraq by the US on 20 March 2003. The American government offered two significant reasons for waging war against Iraq in 2003 (Klare, The Coming War with Iraq, page 3). First of all, the US claimed that Iraq have weapons of mass destruction that could be captured and used by terrorists organizations and would pose a menace to the United States. Secondly, the US argued that the Iraqi regime was a vicious and cruel regime that oppressed its own citizens, and only war could guarantee a new democratic state that could spread democracy out to other Middle Eastern countries. Eventually, the US declared war against Iraq on 20 March, 2003 and that has led to hundreds of causalities. In fact, the main reason why the US invaded Iraq was to secure its political and economical dominance in the region. In that context, whether the US-led war in Iraq can be justifiable or not can be explained by the Just War Theory of jus ad bellum. Just war theory consists of Six Criteria, which are Just Cause, Right Intention, Proper Authority and Public Declaration, Last Resort, Probability of Success, and Proportionality (Orend, War, page 6). Just War Theory argues that if a war is justifiable, it should fulfill all of these six criteria of the jus ad bellum. However, the US-led war in Iraq cannot be justifiable since it contradicts with the Six Criteria for a just war. Initially, the US recent war in Iraq was not based on a just cause as the US main purpose was to protect its economic and political interests in the region. Secondly, the US’s war in Iraq did not have an objective that can be justifiable with ethical principles, since it was triggered by the US retribution for 9/11 events. Moreover, the decision process of the US-led war in Iraq is not based on a Proper Authority and Public…

    • 2565 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays