Preview

Clausewitz's Theory Of War

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1853 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Clausewitz's Theory Of War
Continuing relevance of Clausewitz in understanding nature and character of warfare in 21st century
While many scholars attempted to theorize war in human history, only few were credited for constructing consistent theories on which people could base and further their understanding of war and warfare. Those include Greek Thucydides, Chinese Sun Tzu, and Indian Kautilya all three from 3-4th century BC; Prussian Carl von Clausewitz and Swiss Antoine-Henry Jomini both from 19th century. All of those prominent theorist had a lot to offer and therefore had great influence on our thinking in war, warfare, and strategy. However, Clausewitz’s theory offers more insight if one carefully and purposely studied the “paradoxical trinity” identified in his
…show more content…
Unsurprisingly, this statement generates criticism on applicability of Clausewitz’s theory with the increase of intra-state wars since the end of Cold War. For instance, H.P Willmott and Michael B. Barrett argued that Clausewitz’s theory is overly simplistic, and according to the Prussian, war has only one simple nature which is its subordination to policy and the theory lost its legacy as a result of absence of inter-state war since the first Gulf War. At first glance it might seem that war is inherently subservient to a government as it usually generates politics and directs policies. However, governments are not only policy makers and wage wars on another yet emergence of non-state actors brought change in the current security environment. In fact, Clausewitz had an answer to his critics if one read his book carefully. Essentially he said that “…..the feudal lords and trading cities of the Middle Ages, eighteenth-century kings and the rulers and peoples of the nineteenth century - all conducted war in their own particular way, using different methods and pursuing different aims”. It is therefore fair to assume that he was aware of other actors who would have different aims/policies than those of states. With regard to the ISIS, its main aim is to create Islamic caliphate and its actions against Iraqi and Syria governments, and against the West are continuation of its policies. Therefore, it is fair to say that Clausewitz’s hypothesis on war’s subordination to policy is still applicable while policy itself, in other word, war’s one of characters changing over time. War has been and would be always continuation of policy yet policy makers would decide to provoke it under their assumption of chance to succeed as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    TITLE MAJ Evette Barnes, SG6A, AY 2017-18 November 2017, H100 Question: How does Clausewitz's paradoxical trinity explain the changes to the character of warfare from the methods used by Frederick the Great to those that followed in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries? Carl von Clausewitz defines the nature of war by identifying that which remains constant in all wars using his highly regarded paradoxical trinity ; meanwhile, he acknowledges war has, and will continue to change as the characteristics of warfare change but that the three aspects of the trinity (simplified as government, army, and people ) are constantly at play. It is the variables within the compelling relationships between: instruments…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way in which Clausewitz and Jomini essentially maintain the same principles of war but only differ in what they consider significant such as the idea of movements of armies, the significance of politics and total war principles. Jomini throughout his art of war has shown the importance of planning and strategic movement yet Clausewitz recognizes the significance of other factors of war that are hard to quantify, such as the fog of war, the politics involved in war and the need to be barbarous in…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Written by Chinese tactician Sun Tzu, the Art of War presents the basic principles of warfare and gives military leaders advice and instructions on when and how to fight. The Art of War is written in a very simple and direct manner. Sun Tzu’s work can easily be grasped and his principles understood. There is however a strong sense of morality required to achieving success with these principles. Approached in a holistic and integrated way, each principle is interlocked with the others to form a sum greater than its parts in a direct and concise…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essays by Ambrose, Broyles, Hedges, Kudo, and Styron collectively discuss War in varying contexts, highlighting the effects both before and after war. Some articles intersect on the supporting the idea of another, while others clearly hold opposing views.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clausewitz developed his famous paradoxical trinity. It consists of (1) the people (primordial violence, the mobilization and commitment of the people); (2) the armed forces, which provide the creative management of risk, chance and probability or even luck. They are responsible for the planning and execution of military operations); and (3) the government, which determines the rational policies and objectives of war. Clausewitz was certain that victory could be secured only if the proper equilibrium was achieved among these three dimensions. Ultimately, all three entities must be evaluated and properly targeted before and during the conduct of war. Furthermore, Clausewitz argued, that war is not a science, it is in fact an art where several principles apply. One of those principles or concept is the center of gravity, which is “the hub of all power and movement, on which everything depends. That is the point against which all our energies should be directed.” Another Clausewitzian concept is friction that refers to uncertainties, accidents, the unforeseen, the weather and errors. They have effects on the adversaries decisions, morale and action. “Friction … is the force that makes the apparently easy so difficult.” Having explained the Clausewitz´ trinity, center of gravity and frictions, let’s turn to operation Desert Storm and provide evidence for Clausewitz´ impact on the conduct of…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military theory spans centuries of conflict all across the world. As such, military theorists have written in a variety of military climates, varying from the absence of gun powder to the presence of nuclear weapons. However, some military theories are transcendent. Some elements of Sun Tzu and Clausewitz are eternally wise. While their similarities may become universal truths, their differences are equally worthy of study because, it is in the differences where choices are made. Sun Tzu and Clausewitz agreed that war is chaos, military action is a tool for diplomatic goals and, as such, the results of warfare are not final. Their differences lie in how they advocate for waging war. The style and preparations for war contrast. This is where…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Throughout our time, we have either heard or read about the prodigious people that have shaped or influence the world we live in today. Carl von Clausewitz is a pronounced military theorists who lived during the Napoleon era and saw war as a socio-political activity that skillfully influenced his success. The battles that took place within his time period were heavily influenced by this theory and various revolutionary events that are still adequate for explaining warfare in the modern era.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz’s theories on war are still relevant today with the revisualization of non-state actors on the world scene. The purpose of this essay is to expand on the applicability of these theories in today’s modern warfare where non-state actors play a larger, more global role. The study of theory, especially translated theory, requires an open mind to determine its applicability to various and ever-changing situations. In the case of Clausewitz, many strategists do not view his theories as relevant to today’s wars involving a Nation State vs. non-state actors. This is not true. The U.S. Army Command and General Staff College teaches that the commander’s intent is the most important part of proper execution. Strategists need to look at the intent of Clausewitz and view within the contextual historic period he wrote it, to demonstrate its relevance today. For the purpose of this essay, a Nation States is a sovereign territory that combines a political and geopolitical entity with a cultural or ethnic entity that was arrived at by self-determination. Non-state actors are groups that operate beyond state control and generally include rebel opposition groups (groups with a stated incompatibly with the government, generally concerning the control of government or the control of territory), local militias and warlords. By reviewing Clausewitz’s definitions of war, his theory of “the remarkable trinity” and the historical examples of non-state actors’ involvement with Nation States in war the relevance of Clausewitz will be apparent.…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    German sociologist Max Weber wrote of the Great War, “this war, with all its ghastliness, is nevertheless grand and wonderful. It is worth experiencing” (EP 768). Embellishing the heroism of warfare, Weber reflects a common acceptance of war in the early twentieth century as one of sport and necessity. However, with the development of nuclear arms came a paradigm shift concerning war and its role amid international powers. Acknowledging the destructive potential of nuclear warfare, Kennedy adamantly stated, “We were not going to misjudge or challenge the other side needlessly, or precipitously push our adversaries into a course of action that was not intended” (75). Using historical precedent as his guide, President Kennedy acts upon the belief that war is rarely intentional, while also recognizing the evolving dynamic of war as one of an arms struggle.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Charles Tilly wrote an argument in War-Making and State-Making as Organized Crime, ‘Power holders’ pursuit of war involved them willy-nilly in the extraction of resources for war making from the populations over which they had control and in the promotion of capital accumulation by those who could help them borrow and buy. War making, Extraction, and capital accumulation interacted to shape European state making. Power holders did not undertake those three momentous activities with the intention of creating national states-centralized, differentiated, autonomous, extensive political organizations. Nor did they ordinary foresee that national states would emerge from war making, extraction, and capital accumulation’ (Tilly, 1985). Alternatively, these power holders enjoy the advantages of power within a guaranteed or expanding territory. In order to make war more effectively, they try to locate more capital either in short term by conquest or in long term by impose taxation regularly. As the process…

    • 2267 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    (e) “The just war theory makes war fair” Discuss this statement. You should include different, supported points of view and a personal viewpoint. You must refer to Christianity in your answer. [12]…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Just War Theory

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Matthew 5-7, Jesus talks, about how, the Pharisees and Pagans, do many simple things wrong, like praying, almsgiving, and just following rules God set out for them. For example, the Pharisees, pray in front of everyone, announcing that they are praying, but that is not how God wants you to pray. You and God, should be the only ones knowing you are praying, if you keep humble, then you will be rewarded. I think, that if you are going to do something to please God, or anyone, they should be the only ones that need to know, and give you their approval. You do not other people’s approval because your actions are not for them, you're actions are targeting toward a person or a group of people, not the people following you in the…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Just war theory serves as the moral deliberation on the sensitive issues of warfare. It provides certain limitations or rules in going to war and the conduct of combatants during war. The just war theory has been established under two contested principles; first is that in some cases going to war is just, and the other principle lies under the premise that certain norms exist on how war is conducted in a certain manner. Just war doctrine can be seen in the principles of jus ad bellum (the right to war) and jus in bello (law of war).…

    • 98 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just War Theory Essay

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Just war theory is a set of normative principles that determines when military force is just (jus ad bellum principles) and how war can be executed (jus in bello principle). Although war is generally characterized as aggressive, destructive, and morbid, there are basic principles that ought to guide the conduct during wartime. Under jus ad bellum, the most important principle is that war must have a just cause. This means that the causes that resort to military force must be appropriate. For the war to be just, the war must be declared by a legitimate authority, be of last resort, seek peace as the future goal, violence be proportional to the harm it inflicts, have the right intention and have reasonable chance of success.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is War?

    • 1384 Words
    • 5 Pages

    ‘Two motives lead men to war: instinctive hostility and hostile intention.’ Clausewitz focuses on latter (can’t have former without latter but can have latter without former)…

    • 1384 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays