Preview

Examples Of Clauseewitz's Paradoxical Trinity

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1006 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Clauseewitz's Paradoxical Trinity
TITLE

MAJ Evette Barnes, SG6A, AY 2017-18
November 2017, H100

Question: How does Clausewitz's paradoxical trinity explain the changes to the character of warfare from the methods used by Frederick the Great to those that followed in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries?

Carl von Clausewitz defines the nature of war by identifying that which remains constant in all wars using his highly regarded paradoxical trinity ; meanwhile, he acknowledges war has, and will continue to change as the characteristics of warfare change but that the three aspects of the trinity (simplified as government, army, and people ) are constantly at play. It is the variables within the compelling relationships between: instruments
…show more content…
The transition of governments and policies as instruments of subordination from royal monarchies to democracies and how they governed their citizens and military shed light on the changes to the character of warfare. As a royal-blooded King of Prussia, Frederick the Great harnessed the power of the state to influence the military. His officer corps naturally followed as part of a caste system devoted to their king. Citizens recruited into the military were compelled to follow both through strictly implemented disciplinary actions on the battlefield and through pay via government taxation. Additionally, Frederick insured popularity with the public and his soldiers by …show more content…
Domestically, Frederick insulated his military actions against the will of his enlightened citizens’ belief that war as an ‘unnecessary destiny of mankind; ’ through support of enlightenment priorities, e.g. arts, religious freedom, and freedom of the press. Similarly, the American Revolution was largely a war of will over religious freedom fought over an ocean; General George Washington avoided decisive battles in a strategy to exhaust the will of the British populace and crown to secure American sovereignty. Later in American history the unmeasurable passion of the Confederacy in the American Civil War surprised the Union Army and led to unforeseen victory in battles. It is this passion of the people which enables nations to enter total war in the First World War in the face of lethal technology and tactical

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Americans ways of war and their constant transformations, from their alienated from their mother country into Englishmen. Dr. Grenier discussed the first way of war in the coming up of colonial America through the Creek War of 1813. In his introduction, Dr. Grenier examines the unique way America approached…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    McCullough's detailed depiction of key individuals underscores the interplay of leadership, strategy, and personal resilience in the fight for American independence. The author's sub-arguments emphasize the resilience and patriotism of the Continental Army, the flawed yet pivotal leadership of Washington, and the notion that victory was never assured but achieved through relentless effort and determination. By organizing the book in a compelling, detailed narrative, McCullough highlights the improbable nature of the American victory and the significant contributions of various individuals and battles. This structured approach allows readers to follow the progression of the war and understand how each event and decision contributed to the eventual success of the American Revolution, thereby strengthening McCullough’s main argument about the extraordinary perseverance and leadership that defined 1776. In evaluating David McCullough's "1776," it is crucial to consider the specific evidence that substantiates his arguments about the Continental Army's perseverance and the pivotal moments that shaped the American…

    • 2921 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘The Naked Truth of Battle” written by James Burns, explains and examines the American way of making war as compared to other countries such as the Germany, Britain, and Russia. Details presented in this account revolve around the central idea that Americans emphasize victory by overwhelming force. This, American way of making war, is accomplished by characteristics such as technological and economic superiority as well as logistical expertise. On the contrary, methods used by other countries exemplify the differing ideals in political systems, economic circumstances, and culture as compared to the American way. As described above, the American way of war is rooted in the idea that victory is achieved by overwhelming force, coupled with the first characteristic of technological and economic superiority.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This book captures three main ideas as we look into our nation's military. The first is how industrialization and new technology constantly changed the way we fought. The early musket caused us to be slow on the draw and with improves of firearms, fighting became faster paced. Cannons made long range fighting more prevalent and began the early stages of field artillery. The invention of the automobile caused mobilization to become easier and more accessible. Wars were shorter due to less travel time. Tanks became a strong force on the battlefield. Eventually airplanes threw in a more strategic element to fighting. As they were developed, air strikes and air assaults were a capable force. This led to more thorough planning and threw in more opportunities to win battles. Second, is how breakdowns in leadership caused losses on the battlefield and unnecessary wars being fought. The most famous example is General Custer at Little Bighorn where he led approximately 210 men against a fierce 2,000 man Indian force. Despite warnings and obvious strategic setbacks, he fool-heartedly marched his entire element to their deaths. One less well known is General George McClellan. Maslowski writes that McClellan was reluctant to fight battles. He is quoted saying, "More Likely McClellan feared taking risks and was paralyzed by the prospect of carnage." He lacked the communication skills and the logistical techniques. Maslowski continues to say, "Only trial and error, under circumstances where error could be fatal, produced the necessary adjustments." Considering how warfare changed rapidly throughout the years, this type of adjusting was not uncommon. The last idea is the correlation between war and national policy. Almost every major new policy put in place cause some sort of military backlash, the first being the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Soon thereafter we had army's from Europe knocking at our door to try and maintain their control of the colonies.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should America have suffered from lack of liberty, or through the war with a possibility of winning? Henry thought the war would be their best option, and actually did turn out to be.…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way in which Clausewitz and Jomini essentially maintain the same principles of war but only differ in what they consider significant such as the idea of movements of armies, the significance of politics and total war principles. Jomini throughout his art of war has shown the importance of planning and strategic movement yet Clausewitz recognizes the significance of other factors of war that are hard to quantify, such as the fog of war, the politics involved in war and the need to be barbarous in…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    British operational military successes in North America during 1776 failed to produce a quick victory over the Patriots because of a lack of strategic coherence that manifested itself in three ways: the British leadership failed to understand the kind of war on which they were embarking, they passed the culminating point of the attack from which a quick victory could have been achieved, and they failed to destroy the Patriot center of gravity in a decisive engagement. First, the British failed to adequately understand the strategic question: “What type of war are we embarking on?” British civilian leadership during the war was either incompetent, weak, or obstructed from forming a coherent strategy. Without a single mastermind behind the British strategy, the military commander was allowed authority to conduct military operations how they saw fit and given the power to engage with the Patriot civilian leadership, but with some severe restrictions.…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When it came to funding and domination, the British had a strong advantage over the Americans because the British had gain their funds through their Empire, and the British navy had conquered the sea, but, because the Revolution took place in America, many of the materials and supplies that the British needed took months to arrive, which was a great advantage for the Americans. During the 18th century, it was known that Britain contain the best military because they kept their soldiers well equipped, well fed and well paid, but, the American’s had a strong purpose for fighting this war, which was for freedom and liberty. Even though The Americans had trouble gaining funds to purchase supplies such as shoes and blankets for their soldiers, the…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With open rebellion taking place against Britain, 1776 was a time of political unrest in the American colonies. Yet while their soldiers were openly fighting the British, capturing forts and fortifying cities, few voiced what the colonies true intents were. They were not fighting to negotiate taxes or self-defense, but to proclaim independence. Swaying the colonies to back open rebellion was not an easy task, with a large part of influence for this action coming in thanks to Thomas Paine’s “Common Sense”…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the Virginia Convention, Henry implemented various rhetorical strategies to convince the colonies to declare a war on Britain. He stated that it was natural for them to “indulge in the illusions of hope.” Instead of belittling and mocking his audience for hoping to…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Revolutionary War is considered to be one of the most important wars in the history of the U.S. Americans fought against the British for freedom and independence to have more rights for themselves. Surprisingly, the American colonist defeated the hired British soldiers. How could untrained American colonist possibly beat trained British Soldiers? This essay will explain what contributed to America’s success and how they claimed victory.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz's Theory Of War

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While many scholars attempted to theorize war in human history, only few were credited for constructing consistent theories on which people could base and further their understanding of war and warfare. Those include Greek Thucydides, Chinese Sun Tzu, and Indian Kautilya all three from 3-4th century BC; Prussian Carl von Clausewitz and Swiss Antoine-Henry Jomini both from 19th century. All of those prominent theorist had a lot to offer and therefore had great influence on our thinking in war, warfare, and strategy. However, Clausewitz’s theory offers more insight if one carefully and purposely studied the “paradoxical trinity” identified in his…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Revolutionary War was a tragic and painstaking war fought between America and Great Britain from April nineteenth, 1775, to September third, 1783. The main conflict was over America’s longing for independence, and Britain denying them of this freedom. Even though Britain was at the height of its power, and the United States had a ragtag army and limited resources, America was the unlikely victor. While Britain appeared to have the upper hand, America had a few unpredictable advantages. First of all, allies such as France and Spain aided them on many different grounds that pulled them to victory. Strength was also found in the leadership from the generals, particularly George Washington.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Faced with a mighty British army, it would have been unimaginable that the colonies could win with their untrained militias (Nester, 2004). However, they converted their lack of training into strength by creatively fighting an unconventional war that led to their eventual success. Another value that can be traced to the American independence war is the respect of human rights and respect for basic freedoms. These are aspects that the average American is accustomed to fight for without relenting and they fight for them both through the courts and through mass…

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prussia’s area lacked natural resources due to this the rulers had to find an alternate way to raise its economy. Frederick William, the ruler of Prussia from 1640-1668 was the first major ruler during the uprising of Prussia and he was able to collect large army for Prussia. Prussia lacked army forces back then due to its economic condition, therefore Frederick William taxed his people to create a strong military force in Prussia. And by 40 years the Prussian armies got doubled in size and had the third largest military force in Europe which was a great success for brining Prussia in Power.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays