Preview

Summary Of The Naked Truth Of Battle By James Burns

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
814 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of The Naked Truth Of Battle By James Burns
‘The Naked Truth of Battle” written by James Burns, explains and examines the American way of making war as compared to other countries such as the Germany, Britain, and Russia. Details presented in this account revolve around the central idea that Americans emphasize victory by overwhelming force. This, American way of making war, is accomplished by characteristics such as technological and economic superiority as well as logistical expertise. On the contrary, methods used by other countries exemplify the differing ideals in political systems, economic circumstances, and culture as compared to the American way. As described above, the American way of war is rooted in the idea that victory is achieved by overwhelming force, coupled with the first characteristic of technological and economic superiority. …show more content…
On the other hand, other countries such as Germany, Britain and Russia take a much different approach to their war. First, Germany, which utilizes the military doctrine known as the Blitzkrieg or otherwise known as “lightning war” focuses on the quick, concentrated attacks so that victory can be achieved before the opposition has the opportunity to mount a defense. This tactic is a clear representation of the German political position, and in the case of the Second World War, Hitler, who was the totalitarian leader of the Nazi regime, was able to make these decisions in war time with quick execution. Secondly, Britain, who distinctively relies on its use of sea power to maintain its imperialistic global empire. This ideal not only establishes protected and controlled sea lanes for supply routes, but also the economic stability of the country itself. Both points allow for continued support and enduring capability of its armed forces during war

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the summer of 1940, World War II had been in progress for nearly a year. Adolf Hitler was victorious and planning an invasion of England to seal Europe’s fate. Everyone in the United States of America knew it. The Germans were too powerful. Hitler's Luftwaffe had too many planes, too many pilots and too many bombs and since Hitler was Europe's problem, the United States claimed to be a neutral country (Neutrality Act of 1939). Seven Americans, however, did not remain neutral and that’s what this book is about. They joined Britain's Royal Air Force to help save Britain in its darkest hour to fight off the skilled pilots of Germany's Luftwaffe in the blue skies over England, the English Channel, and North Europe. By October 1940, they had helped England succeed in one of the greatest air battles in the history of aviation, the Battle of Britain. This book helps to show the impact of the few Americans who joined the Battle of Britain to fight off an evil that the United States didn’t acknowledge at the time. The name of Kershaw’s book was inspired from the quote, “Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to sow few,” which was said by British Officer and Prime Minister Winston Churchill.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    10) is bold and raises many eyebrows when discussing US military history. This is because, as he points out, many military historians focus very little on petite guerre and instead focus on the professional military, which leads the historian to a slightly different conclusion. John Grenier quickly disassociates with these historians and argues that distant battles fought by individuals not in a “professional military” actually show the true nature of Americans and their first way to fight war. He says “Americans were quick to turn to extravagant violence” (pg.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Vera Cruz Research Paper

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages

    With the influence of battles such as Vera Cruz, Hampton Roads, and Manila Bay, the military has been able to develop into an unstoppable force. The lessons of Army-Navy cooperation, amphibious operation, technological advancement, and military readiness have resulted in America’s rise to world prominence since the nineteenth century as the nation has grown overtime. This in turn has spread America’s influence throughout the world. No nation can match the might of the United States, because the military has developed overtime into a dominant force which is dedicated to America’s status as a world…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two authors of this book were Allan R. Millett and Peter Maslowski. Maslowski, the author of chapters one through nine, is a professor of U.S. Military History and U.S. History at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. He earned his Ph. D at Ohio State University and has served on the Army Historical Advisory Committee, the Executive Board of War In History, and the Board of Trustees of the Society for Military History. He holds three prestigious awards for outstanding teaching. Millett , the author of chapters ten through eighteen, is a Professor of Military History at Ohio State University. He also earned his Ph. D at Ohio State. A U.S. Marine Corps officer,…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    British operational military successes in North America during 1776 failed to produce a quick victory over the Patriots because of a lack of strategic coherence that manifested itself in three ways: the British leadership failed to understand the kind of war on which they were embarking, they passed the culminating point of the attack from which a quick victory could have been achieved, and they failed to destroy the Patriot center of gravity in a decisive engagement. First, the British failed to adequately understand the strategic question: “What type of war are we embarking on?” British civilian leadership during the war was either incompetent, weak, or obstructed from forming a coherent strategy. Without a single mastermind behind the British strategy, the military commander was allowed authority to conduct military operations how they saw fit and given the power to engage with the Patriot civilian leadership, but with some severe restrictions.…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essays by Ambrose, Broyles, Hedges, Kudo, and Styron collectively discuss War in varying contexts, highlighting the effects both before and after war. Some articles intersect on the supporting the idea of another, while others clearly hold opposing views.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    hius-308 final essay

    • 1559 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “From a strategic standpoint, the American way of war seeks swift military victory, independent of strategic policy success; the desired political and military outcomes do not always align. When analyzed, this…

    • 1559 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After my reading of Robert Ferrell’s America’s Deadliest Battle, I was capable of grasping an understanding of the American Expeditionary Force’s preparation for their battle against Germany in 1918, in addition to assessing the quality of some of the officers and men within the AEF, and some of the actions that displayed the weaknesses and strengths of the AEF as well. Additionally, I will be touching basis on other measures that gave the battle at the Meuse-Argonne its name as “America’s deadliest battle,” and discussing my overall opinion on America’s fighting ability in World War I.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz's Theory Of War

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While many scholars attempted to theorize war in human history, only few were credited for constructing consistent theories on which people could base and further their understanding of war and warfare. Those include Greek Thucydides, Chinese Sun Tzu, and Indian Kautilya all three from 3-4th century BC; Prussian Carl von Clausewitz and Swiss Antoine-Henry Jomini both from 19th century. All of those prominent theorist had a lot to offer and therefore had great influence on our thinking in war, warfare, and strategy. However, Clausewitz’s theory offers more insight if one carefully and purposely studied the “paradoxical trinity” identified in his…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Deck AMH 2020 M,W,F 9:30-1020 Paper 1 Whether it be at home or abroad, time and time again fundamentally conflicting ideas have resulted in physical confrontation. The United States has a love affair with war, dating back to its creation in 1775 and the revolutionary war. No war however has had such a dramatic effect on American society as the Civil War. It has been said that “the although the north won the war, the south won the peace”.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Winning wars is not only about a strong defense. A strong offense is also key to succeed. The central focus of the offensive strategy is to…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military theory spans centuries of conflict all across the world. As such, military theorists have written in a variety of military climates, varying from the absence of gun powder to the presence of nuclear weapons. However, some military theories are transcendent. Some elements of Sun Tzu and Clausewitz are eternally wise. While their similarities may become universal truths, their differences are equally worthy of study because, it is in the differences where choices are made. Sun Tzu and Clausewitz agreed that war is chaos, military action is a tool for diplomatic goals and, as such, the results of warfare are not final. Their differences lie in how they advocate for waging war. The style and preparations for war contrast. This is where…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    J. Hunter Koch Andrea Gillespie English II 11 March 2015 The Truthful and Dreadful Realities of War Does the topic "war" truly generate images of honor and fame? In most wars a winner who achieves his goal and a loser who fails his intended goal always exist. Yet, numerous people in battles generally lose extremely integral elements of life including their own physical lives, relationships with the home front, and future corporal and mental health capabilities. In fact, the Union Army won the Civil War and still suffered more casualties than the Confederate Army (Levy 86).…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Strategic Thinking

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The contents of this paper reflect my own personal views and are not necessarily endorsed by the U.S. Army War College or the Department of the Army.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Some events outside medical sociology that may have influenced the trajectory of perspectives outlined here are world war I, emergence of mass movements by particular groups in society seeking social justice in the early twentieth century, depression of the 1930s and world war II, economic boom following world war II, and demands for social protection. 2. The main difference between social production and social construction of disease is the role that each of them play in the society.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays