Probation Officer Suspension Case Study

Many county probation agencies do not follow the best practices identified by experts and are underperforming in key outcome measures such as the number of probationers successfully completing probation. When considering a probation officer contemplating a decision to seek revocation of a client’s probation, the theories of probation supervision might underlie such a decision because it is pervasive and gives particular warp and depth to the components.
The officer’s decision on considering revocation will depend solely on the motivating factor or rather his belief into the client’s obedience towards the law and rules of which are set in the probation. In addition, the probation officer may fear that his decision would later reflect badly on the probation
In lieu of incarceration, probation is the most common sentence in the United States for convicted individuals. According to Stojkovic S., Kalinich D., & Klofas J. (2015), “Horror stories have highlighted plight that many probation and parole agents face when one of their offenders is caught committing a heinous offense (p. 222). A probation sentence order convicts offenders to adhere to conditions of release that are specified by mandatory conditions or leveled in response to the particular circumstances of the case.
The individuals that are caught violating a condition of probation by the police or probation officers, these individuals are subject to having their probation revoked and all or parts of the original suspended jail sentence imposed. Due to the fact that the probationers are supposed to obey the law at all times, if ever a probationer get arrested a second time, even on a minor charge, that individual may be subject to penalties for both the current arrest and the probation