Preview

Production Planning and Control

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1951 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Production Planning and Control
Introduction The Delphi method was developed in the 1950’s with the purpose of soliciting expert opinion in order to reach consensus (Dalkey & Helmer, 1963, p. 458). It was so named because it was originally developed as a systematic, interactive means of forecasting or prediction, much like ancient Grecians came to the Oracle at Delphi to hear of their fortunes. The approach relies on a collection of opinions from a panel of experts in a domain of real-world knowledge, and aggregates those decisions to reach consensus around a topic. It is different from traditional surveys in that it is an attempt to identify what could, or should be, as opposed to what is (Miller, 2006). Delphi studies are generally used to (Delbecq, Van de Ven & Gustafson, 1975, pg. 11): •Determine or develop a range of possible program alternatives •Explore or expose underlying assumptions or information leading to different judgments •Seek out information which may generate a consensus on the part of the respondent group •Correlate informed judgments on a topic spanning a wide range of disciplines •Educate the respondent group as to the diverse and interrelated aspects of the topic Some of the other key features in Delphi survey research is that the participants are unknown to each other and that the process is iterative, with each subsequent round being derived from the results of the previous one. In other words, each participant receives a summary of the range of opinions from the previous round, and is given an opportunity to reassess their own opinions based on the feedback of other panelists. This controlled feedback helps to reduce the effect of noise, defined as communication which distorts the data as it relates to individual interests and bias, rather than problem solving. The feedback occurs in the form of a summary of the prior iteration, distributed to the panel as an opportunity to generate additional insights and clarify what was captured in the previous

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Delphi method is a great tool for creating a risk assessment. The Delphi method will encourage the teams or groups of subject matter experts to remain anonymous if needed and provide diverse opinions based on the expertise of each individual or group. Having anonymous input will allow for controlled feedback in which the responses from the members are summarized and then given back to individuals or groups. The responses of each member are presented to every other member without identifying who provided these responses. Each member will then be asked to consider their responses in relation to the responses of everyone else. Based on this, they will be asked to respond to the subject again. This method will be used until there is a consensus.…

    • 311 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • Navigate the research process to gather reliable information, explore multiple perspectives and communicate conclusions.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abnormal Psychology Exam I

    • 1957 Words
    • 26 Pages

    A response inventory that asks individuals to provide detailed information about their typical thoughts and assumptions is a(n):…

    • 1957 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    d. Respond thoughtfully to diverse perspectives, summarize points of agreement and disagreement, and, when warranted, qualify or justify their views and understanding and make new connections in light of the evidence and reasoning presented.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Constructively analyzes the group’s accomplishments according to some set of standards; checks to see that consensus has been…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Elaboration Likelihood Model

    • 2902 Words
    • 12 Pages

    4. Explain ELM. What practical advice does it offer persuaders seeking to sway listeners to endorse their proposals?…

    • 2902 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The poetry shows that the colonial America needed a stable government and economy in order to advance.…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theorists assume that the group members of the group who cares about the issue are intelligent, and face a challenging task. They stressed that communication or the term they used, “group interaction” has a positive effect on the final decision.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Delphi technique is a widely used and accepted method for gathering data from respondents within their domain of expertise. The technique is designed as a group communication process which aims to achieve a convergence of opinion on a specific real-world issue. The Delphi process has been used in various fields of study such as program planning, needs assessment, policy determination, and resource utilization to develop a full range of alternatives, explore or expose underlying assumptions, as well as correlate judgments on a topic spanning a wide range of disciplines. The Delphi technique is well suited as a method for consensus-building by using a series of questionnaires delivered using multiple iterations to collect data from a panel of selected subjects. Subject selection, time frames for conducting and completing a study, the possibility of low response rates, and unintentionally guiding feedback from the respondent group are areas which should be considered when designing and implementing a Delphi study. The Delphi technique, mainly developed by Dalkey and Helmer (1963) at the Rand Corporation in the 1950s, is a widely used and accepted method for achieving convergence of opinion concerning real-world knowledge solicited from experts within certain topic areas. Predicated on the rationale that, “two heads are better than one, or...n heads are better than one” (Dalkey, 1972, p. 15), the Delphi technique is designed as a group communication process…

    • 5213 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Physic Notes

    • 3178 Words
    • 13 Pages

    b.iii. In a group, participants hear others estimates influencing how they respond until they can merge? Together.…

    • 3178 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tips to Write Informative Persuasive Essay Composing a persuasive essay resemble being a legal counsellor contending a case before a jury. The essayist stands firm on an issue—either "for" or "against"— and assembles the most grounded conceivable contention to win over the reader. In a persuasive essay, it's the author's business to persuade the reader to acknowledge a specific perspective or make a particular move. Persuasive essays require great examination, familiarity with the reader's inclinations, and a strong comprehension of both sides of the issue.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the deliberation of the group in the planning, execution, and evaluation of the common action of the group. No other method ……

    • 4482 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Delphi Technique

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Other versions, such as the Policy Delphi,[3] have been designed for normative and explorative use, particularly in the area of social policy and public health.[4] In Europe, more recent web-based experiments have used the Delphi method as a communication technique for interactive decision-making and e-democracy.[5]…

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We used five the techniques as described in the text of Plous; consensus, dialectic, dictator, Delphi and collective. (1993). Doing so we believed that following these techniques that we would arrive at a more accurate group judgment.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Team Decision Making

    • 6181 Words
    • 25 Pages

    Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9, 458-467. Davis, J. H. (1992). Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples, 19501990. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 3-38. Dean, J. W., Jr., & Sharfman, M. P. (1996). Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 368-396. Hollingshead, A. B., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Computer-assisted groups: A critical review of the empirical research. In R. A. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates, Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations (pp. 46-78). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Janis, I. L. (1983). Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Kessler, F. (1995). Team decision making: Pitfalls and procedures. Management Development Review, 8(5), 38-40. Kellett, S. (1993). Effective teams at work. Management Development Review, 6(1), 7-11. Manz, C. C., & Neck, C. P. (1995). Teamthink: beyond the groupthink syndrome in selfmanaging work teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10(1), 7-15. Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G., & Mohrman, A. M., Jr. (1995). Designing team-based organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Morgan, B. B., Jr., & Bowers, C. A. (1995). Teamwork stress: Implications for team decision making. In R. A. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates, Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations (pp. 262-290). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Mulvey, P. W., and Veiga, J. F. (1996). When teammates raise a white flag. Academy of Management Executive, 10(1), 40-49. Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. (1994). From groupthink to teamthink: Toward the creation of constructive thought patterns in self-managing work teams. Human Relations, 47(8), 929-952.…

    • 6181 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays