Preview

Professional Negligence In Lend Lease's Contribution Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
459 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Professional Negligence In Lend Lease's Contribution Case
Lend Lease’s contribution case against Cives will focus on the professional services Cives provided and will attempt to avoid any reference to construction negligence. Our defense will include presenting evidence that Cives met the applicable standard of care and that the accident was the result of construction negligence committed by Lend Lease and Midwest in addition to professional negligence on behalf of Midwest. Therefore, using the same percentages as set out above, a potential verdict against Cives solely with regards to Lend Lease’s current contribution claim is $104,250 ($1,668,000 x 25% x 25% = $104,250), for professional negligence, only. (If Lend Lease settles with the remaining plaintiffs, we expect it will pursue it contribution …show more content…

Illinois Tool Works. Consequently, its percentage of liability is reallocated to the remaining parties, excluding the plaintiff. (In a contribution case, the contribution plaintiff is allocated a pro rata share of the employer’s fault). Therefore, both Cives’ Lend Lease’s percentage of liability in relation to Lend Lease’s contribution claim increases from twenty-five percent to fifty percent. (Since Cives and Lend Lease share the same degree of liability, half of Midwest’s percentage of fault is added to each of their percentages.) Applying the reallocated percentages to the current value of Lend Lease’s contribution claim, estimated damages against Cives would be $208,500 ($1,668,000 x 50% x 25% = $208,500), for the contribution claim alone. Combining the estimated damages against Cives for the non-settled plaintiffs’ claim and Lend Lease’s contribution claim, the estimated damages assessed against Cives could be $381,354 to $431,042. Further, in the event Midwest waives the workers’ compensation liens it holds against Mr. Sandoval’s claim and Mr. Aranda’s claim, and using the calculations set forth above, the estimated damages against Cives could increase $154,098 to $203,785 for an estimated total of $535,452 to $634,827, solely for the professional negligence portion of the claim against Cives. It should be noted these calculations will change significantly if the jury finds Midwest is not guilty of professional

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This case is an interesting one because it gets right into the core of the confliction between the proprieties of contractual agreement. This case is focused primarily on Osborne Development Corp. and the multiple defects customers are experiencing with their homes. These upset customers are suing this Corporation in attempts to collect reparations for the discrepancies faced. The homeowners who purchased homes form Osborne Development Corp. (ODC) negligently purchased these homes. According to the Home Buyers Warranty ( HBW), “ Any and all claims disputes and controversies by or between the Homeowner, the Builder, the Warrant Insure and/or HBW…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FACTS Fitness center member Gina Stelluti sustained various injuries while participating in a fitness class. The plaintiff in this case claimed that her injuries were the result of the defendant’s negligence in regards to failing to repair the broken exercise bike, which had caused the injuries to the plaintiff. The defendant had filed for a motion for summery. The original trial court had granted that request. This request was granted due to a liability contract that cleared the defendant of negligence and gross negligence.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    14. As a further result of the injuries sustained by Plaintiff, there is a reasonable probability that Plaintiff will require further medical care and attention and will incur future reasonable and necessary expenses for medical care and attention. Plaintiff’s doctors estimated over $100,000 in future medical bills, plastic surgery, and counseling to be incurred by Plaintiff.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plaintiff Robert Lopez flied a claim against Adelanto Stadium, Inc. claiming negligence on fault of Defendants insufficient design and/or installation of netting protection from foul balls under California Civil Code of Procedure §1714. Compl. ¶ 3. Also, Defendant’s negligence in failure to warn of dangers of foul balls. Compl ¶ 7. Mr. Lopez alleges that Adelanto Stadium, Inc. is liable on the sole grounds that they own the stadium in which Mr. Lopez suffered said injuries. Adelanto Stadium, Inc. moves to dismiss because Mr. Lopez’s claim fails as a matter of law, since it lacks sufficient factual matter to render a finding of negligence.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As to paragraph 1, it is hereby admitted in part. Defendant resides in said county. As for the other allegations, Defendant does not have sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations, and on that basis, denies the allegations.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    FACTS: Defendant, AAA North Jersey, Inc. (“AAA”), contracted with Five Star Auto Service (“Five Star”) to perform towing and auto repair services for AAA. Defendant Terence Pershad, a tow-truck driver employed by Five Star, received a call through AAA to assist a crashed car. Upon Pershad’s arrival at the crash site, Pershad and Plaintiff Nicholas Coker (a passenger of the crashed car) began fighting, which ended soon after Pershad assaulted Plaintiff with a knife. Plaintiff filed suit in a New Jersey state court against Pershad, Five Star, and AAA. The trial court determined that AAA held no responsibility for the alleged negligence of Five Star in hiring Pershad, and granted AAA summary judgement. Coker appealed the trial court’s ruling to the New Jersey Appellate Court.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    dynamic business law

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Javier Galindo, the husband of the plaintiff, was sitting in his car in the driveway of Mr. Clark's property waiting to pick up his wife, who worked as a housekeeper for Mr. Clark, when a leaning 80 ft tree on an adjacent property fell on the plaintiff's husband's car and killed him. Ms. Galindo sued Mr. Clark for failing to notify her husband of the danger posed by the leaning tree.…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Class V.: Case Study

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    (#4-7) According to the case, the plaintiff should not be held as semi liable for his injuries while attending the Daytona International Speedway. My client should receive a decision in his favor because NASCAR and the Daytona International Speedway were and are negligent in how races are conducted, the design of the speedway, and the lack of safety barriers to protect spectators, such as my client, from being severely injured during an event. There were several issues that NASCAR and the Daytona International Speedway are responsible for that resulted in the traumatic injury my client sustained. According to my client the numerous problems that resulted in the plaintiff’s injuries are:…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hocker. He has suffered a total disability which altered his life and affected each member of his family, his beloved wife and loving daughter. It’s just simple negligence, but it had been a calculated scheme of deceit, defraud and oppression where CIC aimed only to protects its financial interests and forfeited Mr. Hocker’s legal rights and interests. Either the jury or the judge in this case, after hearing testimonies, reviewing and the material facts would certainly render a judgment against defendant CIC without…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dustin Soldano v. Howard O’Daniels case models the common dispute between negligence and a party’s responsibility in an event. Likewise, chapter 1 of the Legal Environment textbook features Kuehn v. Pub Zone, a case that demonstrates a different scenario but the same battle of negligence and liability. The commonalities between the two cases support one another in the demonstration of the judges’ decisions as well as contribute to later common law.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alabama Tort Law is the only truly comprehensive resource on tort law in Alabama. With expert discussion of proof requisites and defenses, it covers all the elements of each tort actionable under Alabama law. It provides the information necessary to determine if there is a case and what is needed to prove or defend it. Alabama Tort Law not only provides up-to-date coverage of relevant case law and analysis, it also includes comprehensive appendices with practical material, including checklists and sample complaints for frequently encountered topics.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    -Fact: Russell (D) was severely injured at work, and Sacred Heart General Hospital (P) provided medical treatment. Russell, uncertain who his employer was at the time of the injury, filed workers; compensation claims against each purported employer. The four purported employers and their insurers, including Aetna (D), subsequently entered into a Disputed Claim Settelement (DCS) agreement with Russell (D). The DCS agreement provided the certain sums and expenses would be the sole responsibility of Aetna (D), while Russell (D) would be responsible for his own temporary and permanent disability plus future medical expenses. The Hospital (P), then, brought sult to recover payment for Russell's (D), medical care, claiming an implied-in-fact contract and account stated against Russell (D), and third party beneficiary status under the DCS agreement against Aetna (D). At the close of evidence, Aetna (D) made a motion for a directed verdict, which was denied. The jury relieved Russell (D) of the claim against him, but rendered judgment against Aetna (D). Aetna (D) appealed, claiming it was error to deny…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    tort law

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3) How were the elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress applied to that case? In other words, explain why the court concluded that there was enough evidence to establish intentional…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and assume the risk of particular accident?…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue that arises in this plot is whether the conglomerates are negligent for the contamination of the water supplies of the town, and if their negligence contributed to the injuries (leukemia) of the multiple plaintiffs. After finding that there has been a breach of duty, one must consider if the defendant’s conduct was the cause-in-fact of the…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays