Project Report on Quality of Work Life
A STUDY ON “QUALITY OF WORK LIFE” AT LUCAS- TVS,
PADI
TABLE OF CONTENT
CHAPTERS NO TOPIC PAGE NO
List of Tables
List of Charts
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Company Profile
1.2 Review of literature
1.3 Objective of the study
1.4 Scope of the study
1.5 Limitation of the study
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2.1 Research Design
2.2 Sampling Technique
2.3 Sample Size
2.4 Data Collection Method
2.5 Tools used for analysis
3 RESULT AND INTERPRETATION
3.1 Data analysis and Interpretation
3.2 Findings
3.3 Suggestions
3.4 Conclusion
BIBILIOGRAPHY
ANNEXURE
ABSTRACT
The research is on the basis of A STUDY ON “QUALITY OF WORK LIFE” AT
LUCAS-TVS, PADI. Due to changes in technology and to meet various demands of the employees and to withstand the place in the Global market the company has to focus on employees satisfaction on major areas like job security, job satisfaction, medical facilities, canteen facilities, rewards, ESI, etc.,.
Surveys are an effective way of knowing about employees’ quality of work life in the organization. While exit interviews are generally used, they are a delayed way of knowing the quality of work life.
The study was based on the descriptive research design. The sampling design being used here is
Simple Random Sampling. The sample size 46 has been used
Thus this report seeks to utilize primary research, through structured questionnaires and secondary method involves data collection through magazines and websites.
The tools being used for analysis and interpretation are Chi-Square test and five point liker scales.
The Suggestion made by the employees where mostly implemented whenever they were applicable. LIST OF TABLES
Table
no
PARTICULARS Page no 3.1.1 Satisfaction of salary package
3.1.2 Satisfaction of current job
3.1.3 Satisfaction of casual leave with pay
3.1.4 Satisfaction with medical facilities
3.1.5 Satisfaction with bonus
3.1.6 Satisfaction with canteen facilities
3.1.7 Satisfaction of ESI & PF
3.1.8 Satisfaction with health & safety working condition 3.1.9
PADI
TABLE OF CONTENT
CHAPTERS NO TOPIC PAGE NO
List of Tables
List of Charts
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Company Profile
1.2 Review of literature
1.3 Objective of the study
1.4 Scope of the study
1.5 Limitation of the study
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2.1 Research Design
2.2 Sampling Technique
2.3 Sample Size
2.4 Data Collection Method
2.5 Tools used for analysis
3 RESULT AND INTERPRETATION
3.1 Data analysis and Interpretation
3.2 Findings
3.3 Suggestions
3.4 Conclusion
BIBILIOGRAPHY
ANNEXURE
ABSTRACT
The research is on the basis of A STUDY ON “QUALITY OF WORK LIFE” AT
LUCAS-TVS, PADI. Due to changes in technology and to meet various demands of the employees and to withstand the place in the Global market the company has to focus on employees satisfaction on major areas like job security, job satisfaction, medical facilities, canteen facilities, rewards, ESI, etc.,.
Surveys are an effective way of knowing about employees’ quality of work life in the organization. While exit interviews are generally used, they are a delayed way of knowing the quality of work life.
The study was based on the descriptive research design. The sampling design being used here is
Simple Random Sampling. The sample size 46 has been used
Thus this report seeks to utilize primary research, through structured questionnaires and secondary method involves data collection through magazines and websites.
The tools being used for analysis and interpretation are Chi-Square test and five point liker scales.
The Suggestion made by the employees where mostly implemented whenever they were applicable. LIST OF TABLES
Table
no
PARTICULARS Page no 3.1.1 Satisfaction of salary package
3.1.2 Satisfaction of current job
3.1.3 Satisfaction of casual leave with pay
3.1.4 Satisfaction with medical facilities
3.1.5 Satisfaction with bonus
3.1.6 Satisfaction with canteen facilities
3.1.7 Satisfaction of ESI & PF
3.1.8 Satisfaction with health & safety working condition 3.1.9
References: 1. Lawler III E and Porter L, (1966). Managers pay and their satisfaction with their pay. 4. Taillefer,-Marie-Christine; Dupuis,-Gilles; Roberge,-Marie-Anne; Le-May,-Sylvie (2003) Health-related quality of life models: Systematic review of the literature 6. Taylor J C in Cooper, CL and Mumford, E (1979) The quality of working life in Western and Eastern Europe 7. Warr, P, Cook, J and Wall, T (1979) Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well being 8. Mirvis, P.H. and Lawler, E.E. (1984) Accounting for the Quality of Work Life. Journal of Occupational Behaviour 9. Baba, VV and Jamal, M (1991) Routinisation of job context and job content as related to employees quality of working life: a study of psychiatric nurses 11. Sirgy, M. J., Efraty,, D., Siegel, P & Lee, D. (2001). A new measure of quality of work life (QoWL) based on need satisfaction and spillover theories 12. Bearfield, S (2003)Quality of Working Life. Aciirt Working paper 86. University of Sydney. 14. Worrall, L. & Cooper, C. L. (2006). The Quality of Working Life: Managers’ health and well-being 15. Lawler, E. E. (1982). Strategies for improving the quality of work life. American Psychologist, 37, 2005, 486-493. 16. Danna, K. & Griffin, R. W. (1999). Health and well-being in the workplace: A review and synthesis of the literature 17. Loscocco, K. A. & Roschelle, A. N. (1991). Influences on the Quality of Work and Nonwork Life: Two Decades in Review 18. Van Laar, D, Edwards, J & Easton, S (2007). The Work-Related Quality of Life scale for healthcare workers 19. Edwards, J., Van Laar, D.L. & Easton, S. (2009). The Work-Related Quality of Life (WRQoL) scale for Higher Education Employees