Preview

Pros And Cons In The Battle Of Hastings

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
691 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons In The Battle Of Hastings
The Battle of Hastings was fought on 14 October 1066 between the Norman army of Duke William of Normandy and an English army under King Harold Godwinson, following the death of Edward the confessor which left no heir to the English throne. Three men competed for the throne these were: Harold Godwinson an English noble man also Edward’s son in law; Harald Hadrada a Viking warrior who had never lost a battle and finally the next king William duke of Normandy.
The battle started at about 9 am, Harold’s weary men gathered at the top of Senlac hill above the Norman force. It would seem as if Harold had the upper hand as he had the high ground a major advantage; however he lacked many things that William had like the use of cavalry and archers. Other factors also contributed to Harold’s defeat and William’s victory.
Firstly William had more soldiers that made up his army. Secondly Harold’s men were tiered from the battle of Stamford Bridge. Also William’s men were highly trained and experienced whereas Harold’s men were mainly farmers and were poorly paid. William’s tactics also played a huge role in the battle.
The Normans attacked
…show more content…
A man was created a knight by being dubbed (struck on both shoulders with a sword). This was a ceremony that was usually performed in church. In return for a grant of land or money, the knight did military service for his lord on a set number of days. To go into battle a knight needed a horse, a shield, a lance, a sword and a hauberk. The knight also wore a conical helmet that had a nose guard for further protection against blows to the face. Norman knights also used spurs and stirrups. Cavalry or horsemen were soldiers or warriors who fought mounted on horseback. Cavalry were historically the most mobile of the combat arms. An individual soldier in the cavalry is known by a number of designations such as cavalryman, horseman, dragoon, or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    William 's later chroniclers claim (after the fact) that Edward the Confessor offered William the crown and sent Harold to pledge it to him in the Winter of 1064/5. In fact, reading between the lines we can see that Harold was shipwrecked in Normandy whilst trying to visit France, and took advantage of the situation by trying to secure the release of his brother & nephew who were held as hostages in…

    • 9305 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the two armies finally met at the Battle of Stamford Bridge, Harold proves to be victorious. This was thought to be a huge victory and a defining moment for England until Harold discovers some interesting news. As Harold and his men were just enjoying a huge victory in battle, they learn of Duke William and his army coming in on the southern coast of England. This was important because right after a critical battle in the northern part of England, Harold must now navigate his troops back down to the southern coast in a desperate attempt to defend…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sword was the weapon of choice for medieval knights, The knight wielded the sword in his strongest arm, with the reins of his horse in the other hand, The sword had a leather grip on it with varying metal decorations on the end, called a pommel.. Moving up from the grip is a bar of metal called a cross-guard. This protected the knights hands, The Sword starts out with a thick blade and gradually gets narrower and sharper towards the end. The knight would stab at the opponent through the chainmail or if the opponent…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William did not know it yet, but by allowing this to happen he had already lost the battle before it began. All William had to do was put more guards…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first line of the American troops were armed with rifles while the Britsih soilders were armed with muskets. The rifles fired with more accuracy and distance then the muskets. This allowed American soilders to pick off British officials before they were even in range to fire back. Taking out a lot of officials and even calvarymen really softened the blow of the British soilders This was a massive advantage for the American soilders.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason Richard lost the Battle of Bosworth was because of the Stanley’s changing sides. The Stanley’s controlled around 6000 of Richards troops, around half of his overall army. Although the Stanley’s began the battle on the side of Richard, they changed during the battle. This meant that Richard has far fewer troops than he may have anticipated, and had the Stanley’s not changed sides, it is possible that Richard would have won. Many of Richards other nobles were also unreliable, such as Northumberland. He did not help Richard when he needed it, refusing to bring in Richards reserves, and eventually surrendering, giving Henry an advantage over Richard, helping him to win.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Up until the end of the thirteenth century the mass cavalry charge was the ace-card of battle. The destructive fury of a group of heavily armoured knights could break any unit. Knights lived their entire life to fight. They trained all day in the art of war and at tourney they practised war-games constantly. As time progressed they developed more discipline and cavalry units began to regroup and hit second or third units with a charge. However, throughout the period the discipline of knights was always suspect and the pursuit for personal glory a priority. What would a peasant warrior do when faced…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Battle of bosworth

    • 700 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Richard lost at the battle of Bosworth can be put into long and short-term factors. In the short term, to start with Richard outnumbered Tudor’s men 10000 to 5000 and were obviously favoured to be victorious, however when Richard tried to kidnap Tudor, this forced Tudor to seek help from the French. This allowed for King Charles to use henry as a means of unsettling the English Monarchy, to do this Charles gave Henry 60000 francs and 1800 highly professional mercenaries to use in the battle. Although Richards’s men outnumbered Tudor’s, Tudor’s men were of higher skill level and this was certainly a factor of defeat.…

    • 700 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    General George Washington commanded approximately 8,800 American soldiers and General de Rochambeau commanded about 7,800 French soldiers they both fought side by side against the British forces that embedded itself in Yorktown, Virginia (Mackenzie, J). The allied forces used conventional tactics, but what shifted the outcome of this Siege was the use of artillery, cannon, and mortars fires. The Thirteen Colonies…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the battle of Bosworth field, Richard seems to have had a larger number of fighting men than Tudor and also held the higher ground, however many contemporaries stated that the battle was largely a stalemate, suggesting that Tudor’s preparations for battle had been successful, at least for the fact that he was able to hold his own against an opponent with greater numbers and a more preferable geographical position. It was not until Richard’s fateful “suicide charge”; a charge with the aim of directly attacking the oppositions leader, rather than being explicitly suicidal. Thanks to the Swiss-trained French mercenaries in Henry’s garrison and their tactics never before seen on English soil and Thomas, Lord Stanley’s last minute decision to support Henry, Richard was killed and Tudor took his crown. Thus Henry’s success in replacing Richard of York as king of England, would not be as we know it had Richard not made the dramatic charge that resulted in his death, but whether the success would ever have occurred is still yet to be explored.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Battle of Quebec

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The battle started at approximately 1000 hrs in a land originally own by a farmer named Abraham Martin. As the British Army…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Their adoption was revolutionary, for it enabled a heavily armored horseman to retain his balance in the saddle whilst using a weighty spear, sword, or lance. (Seth-Smith, 28) As technology advanced so did the weapons used. Knights going into battle would be equipped with swords and daggers, the most common weapons used in hand to hand combat. Blades were specially designed for its owner so weight, length, and handle design all varied (Jordan 180). Some knights would be skilled enough to shoot a bow and arrow while riding their horse. Armor was used to cover both the knight and his horse. Another weapon that was used while riding the horse was the lance. This was a 9 to 14 foot pole made of wood with a steel tip. It would be used to unhorse enemies. Scale armor was one of the earliest forms of armor made from bronze, iron, leather, and even bones. The problem with this type of armor is that knights were not able to maneuver while riding on their horse. This problem was fixed with the later invention of chain mail armor. This was made from metal rings linked together to form a mesh (Jordan 181). All of these weapons and armors were used in battle by knights, who took all of the same items and turned them to…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within the Tapestry, this is depicted within the one-sidedness of the aforementioned battle preparations. This is seen from both the ability of the Normans to construct the boats needed to cross the Channel, the quick building of the motte-and-bailey castles for defence, and even in the number of forces that William was able to procure for the invasion. Although much of this can be attested to the perspective of the embroidery being from a pro-Norman viewpoint, it still nonetheless attests to an organized battle on the side of William pitted against a rushed Anglo-Saxon conglomeration. In actuality, this perhaps reflects the fact that the Anglo-Saxons, under King Harold, had recently faced two other invasions to the north. This is of no mention within the Tapestry, an omission that gives the Normans the appearance of defeating fierce army, but still allows for the depiction that Herlands force that was the lesser military…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While I was reading 1066 I learned a lot about the history of England and how the Battle of Hastings nearly destroyed it, but the English refused to let their country die. Some of the events of that year are still being debated over but there is no way to know exactly how the events played…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King Haralds Saga

    • 535 Words
    • 2 Pages

    King Harald first gained his political power after the Battle of Stikelsted. Haralds half-brother was King Olaf the Saint, they both fought side by side during the Battle of Stikelsted. During the battle his half brother Olaf was killed and Harold was also injured but managed to escape from the battlefield. During the escape he was helped by Rognvald Brusason and brought into Russia where he first met King Jaroslav. Jaroslav gave Harold the position of commander of his defense…

    • 535 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays