Preview

Pros And Cons Of Lobbyism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
542 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Lobbyism
Today there is a limit on the size of gifts to members of Congress from lobbyist. This limit proposes that any gift that is less than fifty dollars in value can be given to Congress members and staff by lobbyist. In addition, each year a lobbyist cannot give more than one hundred dollars in gifts to both Congress members and staff. These guidelines were put into place to prevent conflict and controversy. Specifically, these regulations were made to prevent laws from coming into place and policy changes because of lobbyist offering and persuading Congress members and staffers through very expensive gifts. The book states that, “Interest groups lobbying often involves cases where resources favor one side.” Therefore, if lobbyist do have a good amount of money, they would have an advantage because they could provide a large amount of gifts. This may cause the Congress members to become more willing to make policy changes because of the continuous attention and gifts they are provided by the lobbyist. The government wanted to establish these guidelines to prevent this from occurring all together because it is not right. Due to this, countless reform proposals worked to prevent lobbyist from providing a member of Congress with anything. …show more content…
Since the problem of lobbyist persuading Congress to make certain laws or policies, and restrictions can create more problems, I do not believe that the rules are adequate. To begin, the rules that are currently in position has led to their being more work given to Congress members and staffers. They are forced to report about anything that they receive from lobbyist even if the person is their friend, colleague, or neighbor. This creates a lot of conflict but there can be exceptions made, but unfortunately it is a complicated

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In his book, Big Money: 2.5 Billion Dollars, One Suspicious Vehicle, and a Pimp- on the Trail of the Ultra-Rich Hijacking American Politics, author Kenneth P. Vogel writes on the newly less regulated, and arguably more corrupt relationship between the American political system and big money donors. In this response paper I will address the main questions in relation to the text. One, which Supreme Court decision allowed for the rise in “Big Money’s” influence over the American political system? Two, how did the Supreme Court decision addressed in question one change both the American political landscape and the fundraising techniques used by those involved in political fundraising? And third, how did the Republicans and Democrats each respond in 2012 to “Big Money” in the American political system. I will follow the answers to these questions with a later section in my paper devoted to a personal response to Vogel’s text, as well as connections between his text and broader topic discussed in our Interest Groups class lectures.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Super PAC is an independent group of super powers that donate money to a party or candidates. Even though there are a few good outcomes of a Super PAC, for example leveling out the playing field by helping candidates with campaign money to help inform the public about each candidate's opinion, but the biggest pro of a Super PAC would be reminding us how corrupt the system actually is. Super PACs allow a very small group of rich people to donate lots of money to one candidate. Making small donations to be almost useless. Super PACs is for millionaires and billionaires. Also corporations or other wealthy industries. Forcing citizens to watch a corrupt downfall in our democracy due to the rich. Presidential Super PACs are operating "independently"…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Progressives had beliefs such as industrialization and urbanization had created troubling social and political problems. Progressives wanted to bring about reforms that would correct what they saw as problems and injustices. The Antitrust Laws were designed to prevent and punish anti-competitive practices. Progressives complained that the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was inadequate and ineffective in limiting the abuses of big businesses. The Progressives made states pass the antitrust laws to make cartels and monopolistic practices illegal and to regulate railroad rates.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The antitrust act hasn’t changed since it has been created, however the advancement of technology has made it difficult to establish which company would fall under the antitrust act. Older industries are easier to deal with because they are most likely to have a line of cases. Railroads industries for example, have been around for a long time now, which means there has been judges deciding things about it for more than a century. The problem are the technology companies, those are very contemporary making it more difficult for economists and lawyers to decide what is going against the antitrust laws and what isn’t. Furthermore, the advancement of technology has drastically increase deals between different countries. Considering this, before a deal gets approved, it has go through all the antitrust acts from all the countries involved in the deal. A very challenging and long lasting process. Antitrust acts have been around for more than a century, however it has been going through some changes to keep up with the advancements of…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, others claim that campaign contributions are not a form of bribe used by interest groups to gain access to politicians, but rather campaign contributions are a result from politicians extorting business interest groups (Gilens et al 568). But this argument does not have sufficient evidence to support its claim. Moreover, if politicians are extorting interest groups for contributions, then one can assume that policies would not reflect the preferences of interest groups, but they…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lobbyists Research Paper

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    is in my personal opinion lobbyist can absolutely be effective in changing federal policy as long as they have the voter support that they need. It is very similar to a fire; a fire will not burn if it does not have the fuel that it needs to burn. The same is with lobbying for policy, if the votes are not there to support that particular policy then the policy will not become signed. This could be in the favor of the lobbyist’s agenda which would make it effective, but if it hurts their agenda because it fails then they have not effected change in the federal policy that necessarily supports their agenda.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The bureaucracy, congressmen, and lobbyist have a mutual beneficial relationship known as “Iron Triangles.” These three groups work together to not only benefit themselves but each other all at once. Iron triangles operate in a constant motion. Powerful, wealthy, and dominant people make up the iron triangle within our government. While working together to get what they want, they also challenge the power of the congress to pass the policies and laws most beneficial to them.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of a representative government is for the people to be represented through the voices of others, which is what our founding fathers envisioned. Lobbyists are people who represent a special interest group and persuade various…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PART I: LOBBYING & INFLUENCE OF SPECIAL INTERESTS In the video, “The Unelected: The Lobbies,” it talks about how money is the best way to make your voice heard. It can do things such as blocking out policies that would help lower the chances of injuries at work (at the cost of millions to billions for the companies), have your ideals shared to the entire country, and ruin the health of others with policymakers turning a blind eye. In the book, “American Public Policy an Introduction,” it asks, “Does social justice require that we “spread the wealth” around?” (Cochran 5).…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Campaign finance reform is the issue of our lifetime. While we may point to climate change, gun control, economic inequality, the underlying problem is the influence of money in politics. Our representatives are focused on winning elections, instead of addressing constituent concerns. They have to specifically focus on spending the majority of their working time calling donors, and raising money for their campaigns, that this puts their real job on hold. Time spent calling people and asking for donations is estimated to be around ⅓ to ½ of their work day. Just this fact itself proves that the insane influence of money in politics is detrimental to democracy and disallows politicians to focus on what really matters: the voices…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ross article also states agrees with Grier's in how Congress tried to make sure that corruption is kept in check “In recent years, Congress has imposed increasingly strict limits on the activities of registered lobbyists. Gifts of any kind or value are pretty much forbidden. Not only must registered lobbyists file quarterly reports detailing the contacts they made with elected officials, but they must disclose how much money they were paid to do it. Registered lobbyists are also required to file semiannual reports listing any contributions made to elected officials or political campaigns. While these requirements are a step in the right direction, critics say, they are ineffective if so few practicing lobbyists are required to register under the current legal definitions.”(2009). Despite that efforts of Congressmen we can see many people still feel is not enough to combat wealthy lobbyists groups many feel that that they can still influence members of Congress one way or…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Senator Ted Cruz, a Republican from Texas, has been somewhat of a bright light in the dark chasm that is Capitol Hill as far as term limitation is concerned. He is firmly behind the idea of Congressional term limitation and is genuinely convinced that the entirety of Capitol Hill is corrupt. In 2015, Cruz was quoted as saying”…career politicians today make up what I call the Washington Cartel… (they) on a daily basis are conspiring against the American people.” Furthering his stance on political corruptness, Cruz also states that “Career politicians’ ears and wallets are open to the highest bidder (Schwarz).” To bluntly sum up Cruz’s statement, it is his belief that the American people are being scammed by the men and women they voted for. Probably the most intimidating part of his statement is the fact that he is addressing people he has been working with for some time. Perhaps if Mr. Cruz were to persuade some of the other younger members of Congress to see what he envisions, the Amendment would be able to see the light of…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reporter: A new campaign finance reform bill being considered by Congress would limit the amount of campaign contributions that political candidates can receive. However, a survey of candidates running for mayor, governor, and senate seats shows that not one of them favors the bill. Clearly, there is no desire among politicians to limit campaign contributions.…

    • 2784 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress is organized hierarchically and lobbying for Congressional policy involves an interest group’s active attention and participation throughout the entire process that a bill of interest is in the process of becoming law. A bill must make it through its specific committee before it can make the floor debate in the second stage. In the committee stage, committee chairs hold substantial power and can kill a bill by refusing to put it into the meeting agenda or advocate for a bill by calling meetings and forming subcommittees to discuss the bill. A successful lobbyist working on behalf of an interest group would attempt to influence the bill from this very first stage by either trying to influence the committee chair or a number of committee…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The iron triangle consists of interest groups, congress, and the Bureaucracy. All three sides work together to increase their power and expand political influence. Interest groups provide congress electoral support, congress provides the Bureaucracy with funding and political support, the Bureaucracy provides special favors for interest groups. Interest groups provide the Bureaucracy with congressional support through lobbying, the Bureaucracy provides congress with policy choices and execution, and congress provides interest groups with friendly legislation and oversight. Interest groups that see there is a problem with a policy and begin to collect evidence on how and why it needs to be changed. They then begin to lobby the government. Some of the more organized and better funded interest groups will hire representatives to advocate on their behalf. Seats in congress are elected positions; therefore, congressmen are going to pay close attention to what the people who elect them want so they are not voted out of office. Interest groups not only provide campaign funds and influence; they also provide information and expertise that the other sides of the triangle may not have otherwise. Congress and the Bureaucracy need this information to make policy changes and they do not have…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays