Preview

Pros And Cons Of Operation Fast And Furious

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
194 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Operation Fast And Furious
I don't agree with the methods employed in Operation Fast and Furious. Main reason is the ridiculousness of the pros and cons. There are much more cons in this situation right off the start. The moment the federal government decided to sell 2,000 rifles and handguns to these cartels is when they made an inexcusable mistake. You can't give criminals weapons and expect to track them as if they will be insight or fully in control of them. Better methods should have been implemented in this program. Starting with the under staffing of the operation, the ATF should have requested greater help and communication with the local law enforcement agencies. I guess in some ways certain federal agencies keep certain operations a secret to prevent being

Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Keystone Pipeline Pros And Cons
    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Keystone Pipeline Pros And Cons

    The Keystone Pipeline, also known as Keystone XL, is a 1,179-mile-long pipeline from oil fields in Western Canada to the Midwestern United States. Specifically, this pipeline will extend from Alberta, Canada to Steele City, Nebraska with plans to link to an existing pipeline that reaches to the Gulf Coast. Despite the advantages this pipeline will produce, it will also create various negative effects regarding wildlife and inhabitants of these areas, economic and political issues, as well as challenge government policies and regulations.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Dakota Access Pipeline
    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Dakota Access Pipeline

    There should never have been a problem with the Dakota Access Pipeline, and it should be built. The pipeline has many benefits, and few, if any, actual problems. Nodaplsolidarity.org, a site dedicated to opposing and protesting the pipeline, avoids the issue of what the problems with it actually are, saying that the pipeline is a violation of the United Nation’s Declaration of Universal Human Rights, and a violation of the United Nation’s Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, without actually naming what it is about the pipeline that violates these declarations. Since there appear to be no actual issues violated (and they are declarations of the United Nations, not the United States) these problems can be dismissed, leaving us with…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    National Defensive Administration Act Pros And Cons
    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page

    National Defensive Administration Act Pros And Cons

    The National Defensive Administration act is on how it protects the citizens, the military and their family from anything happening to them. It allows the people who are expected to be terrorists to be helps until the war in terrorism finishes. Simply, it also allows the government to whisk the citizen away for no reason other than them being suspected of terrorism. For each year congress signs the National Defensive Administration Act, in order to protect our nation and our military personnel. The function of the National Defensive Administration Act is to provide benefits to the military and for the protection of the military family and the citizens of the U.S. It helps the citizens from being unsafe to them being safe.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of United States Bombing Japan
    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of United States Bombing Japan

    I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Police Brutality Policies
    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of Police Brutality Policies

    Regarding police brutality, policies have already been put in place to try to solve this major issue. Examples of policies are special training for police officers to teach them how to properly handle situations, body cameras to monitor officers' actions, and special out of state prosecutors to judge and indict officers and reduce bias. However, these policies alone only solve pieces of the problem, not the big picture. These plans have their advantages and disadvantages, and might not work as planned.…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The US Invasion
    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of The US Invasion

    While most Americans call the war the, “American-Mexican War”, the other side would call it, “The U.S. Invasion”. If it is God’s reasoning to expand the U.S. territory as far as possible, then is it also his reasoning to murder those upon their own land? It is not only unjustified to take the land from the Mexicans, however to become inhuman enough to kill those while doing so is unspeakable. There was no need for any more conflict at that time, so to start a war was not ideal for anyone. Would a war be more beneficial or cost efficient than a compromise or a buyout? The Mexicans had only simple ideas of allowing outsiders into their land to increase population. In the words of General Francisco Mejia, “The right of conquest has always been…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The War On Terrorism And Patriot Act
    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The War On Terrorism And Patriot Act

    The War on Terrorism and Patriot Act are two important acts regarding terrorism. What is the War on Terrorism and Patriot act you may ask? Well the Patriot act was made so that the United States could hold someone in custody if they are connected or could piently be connected to terrorist groups. Now we have the War on Terrorism act. This act was made so that in the case of a terrorist attack they can stop it with military action. Even though they both have their pros they also have cons. Terrorism is horrible and can lead to the death of innocent people but there are ways we can stop it including and not including the patriot act and War on Terrorism.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombing
    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombing

    The dropping of the Atomic Bomb was an attack made on the Japanese by the Americans. Although the dropping of the Atomic Bomb by the United States helped to end World War II, the act was unjustified because of innocent Japanese civilians that were needlessly murdered and were not given sufficient time to surrender from the area. Consequently, the Japanese were defeated before and they were attempting to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the unsuccessful bombing with conventional weapons. This would be the reason that the bombing was not useful.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    9/11 Cons
    • 2334 Words
    • 10 Pages

    9/11 Cons

    There were terrorist attacks against the U.S. prior to 9/11, but it is generally accepted that the War on Terror started with the attacks on September 11, 2002, when four airplanes were hijacked by terrorists and were crashed into the north tower of the World Trade Center, the south tower of the World Trade Center, the Pentagon building, and one plane crashed into a field in Pennsylvania after the passengers overpowered the hijackers and piloted the plane into a field so that it would not harm anyone on the ground. George W. Bush, in 2002, took action days after September 11th, and he started what he called a "War on Terror (Samuels).” The George W. Bush administration coined the term "War on Terror" which refers to the battle with the…

    • 2334 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Law Enforcement
    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Law Enforcement

    “I believe that almost all law enforcement officials are upstanding, dedicated public servants who deserve our appreciation and support -- and not to be used as scapegoats or, as we've seen lately, become targets of violence” (Toomey). Though this is the mindset that a majority of the population of the United States holds, there is still a portion which has opposing opinions in their outlook upon law enforcement personnel. Within the past few years there has been an increase in unprovoked attacks upon law enforcement personnel, these attacks are commonly promoted by several sections of American society that wish to see harm done to these brave men and women. A better understanding of the feelings and relationships that law enforcement personnel…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death Penalty Pros And Cons
    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page

    Death Penalty Pros And Cons

    Some pros to the death penalty are that it protects innocent people and that the death penalty serves as a deterrent. Sentencing convicted murderers with the death penalty we are protecting inmates, guards, and people outside the prison. If we do not sentence convicted murderers with the death penalty and instead sentence them with life we are giving them the opportunity to murder while in prison. A statistic shows that by executing convicted murderers we are saving from three to eighteen innocent lives. The death penalty serves as a deterrent because without the death penalty there would be a lot more murderers. This is so because a lot of people do not commit murder in fear of the death penalty and those who have committed murder would…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Mass Incarceration
    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Mass Incarceration

    Mass incarceration reveals the essence of the problems in America’s criminal justice system. It shines light on the presence of inequality as well as the flaws in the policies. Mass incarceration became a huge problem in the US with the onset of the War on Drugs. Since then, the number of prisoners has increased significantly and a great proportion of the prisoners include drug offenders. Beckett and Sasson argue that the inequality here lies in the fact that members in the minority populations are sought after because unlike many private transactions that happens amongst upper class individuals, those that take place between members of the lower class tend to be more visible.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Death Penalty
    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Death Penalty

    Capital punishment in the America has been practiced by 31 states since the death penalty was reactivated in 1976. As well, when the death penalty was brought back, a new method of execution was introduced to the criminal justice system, and today 14 states preserve this new process of executing inmates by lethal injection. In United States, as an alternative of abolishing the death penalty, have continued building prisons to incarcerate its law breakers. Across the country, from 1990 to 2005, new prisons were opened every ten days. Overall, people, advocate extreme opinions about it, contemplate the death penalty a type of justice. Death Penalty and abolition have strong arguments of whether…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Your Safety or Theirs?
    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Your Safety or Theirs?

    One issue is the mandatory life prison sentence without the possibility of parole for "drug lords." Drug lords are individuals who control a sizable network of people involved in the illegal drug trade. They are responsible for the deaths of many innocent people, the high drug increase all over countries around the world, and the corruption of many governments. Individuals such as these people have the capability of destroying families and lives just for their own profitable gain. Which no one these days would be a fan of. My opinion about drug lords is to lock them up. Plain and simple. They have no care in the world for the public other than the need for their money and desire for that innocent corruption. Sending monsters like that to prison would definitely reflect the positive side of public-order. If there were more people who were motivated enough to pursue these cartels, society would not be so scared to go out and do the things we used to do. More gangs are involved in drugs now, more drugs can be seen on the streets, and a definite threat has increased in the back of the public 's mind. No one wants their child playing with dope or guns. Until the cartels are behind bars, there will always be that uneasiness.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty
    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

    The death penalty is used universally, in developed countries, as well as, in undeveloped countries. The death penalty is used more for retribution and retaliation than it is for justice. The death penalty does not deter crime effectively, it is incompatible with human rights and human dignity, used against minorities and the poor, and there is always the risk of executing innocent people. Its easy to agree to the death penalty when the accused is not someone you know...bu what if the accused was your son, daughter, father, mother, brother, or sister? Would you still be for the death penalty?…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics