Pros And Cons Of Privatization Of Public Services
A powerful authoritative figure engages with the economic, social and political aspects of a nation, whilst still respecting the rights, freedoms, and liberties of each individual. One should embrace the perspective presented in the source, and the ideologies of a liberal government. Firstly, minimal government intervention leads to inequality and economic insecurity, reflected in the industrial revolution; while excess government involvement infringes on the rights and freedoms of individuals, such as in Harrison Bergeron. Secondly, although an effective governor permits some intervention with the economy, the principles of individualism remain instilled into the foundation of modern liberalism. Hence, privatization of public services holds
…show more content…
Jean Chretien states in the source that a political leader should espouse the “whole social and economic system, including businesses, the unions and the universities.” Thus, one should embrace the perspectives in the source and the notions of a liberal government. Privatization occurs when an enterprise or industry is transferred from the public sector, a portion of the economic system administered by government agencies, to the private sector, or the citizen sector. According to John Locke’s original philosophy, set as the basis for contemporary liberalism, one has the natural rights to life, liberty, and property; therefore, privatization is embraced in liberalism. Through the promulgation of unions as a strategy for privatization, public funding is limited, swapping it for privately owned social welfares. A study in Ontario of the Healthy Babies Healthy Children (HBHC) program discovered an increasing rate of social service providers undertaking privatization. By decreasing provincial federal funding, HBHC was transitioned from a publicly funded organization to a private means of public services. With the introduction of public services such as Canada Health and Social Transfer in 1995, provincial funding, education, and social welfare services were reduced significantly; encouraging provinces to establish public-private
Jean Chretien states in the source that a political leader should espouse the “whole social and economic system, including businesses, the unions and the universities.” Thus, one should embrace the perspectives in the source and the notions of a liberal government. Privatization occurs when an enterprise or industry is transferred from the public sector, a portion of the economic system administered by government agencies, to the private sector, or the citizen sector. According to John Locke’s original philosophy, set as the basis for contemporary liberalism, one has the natural rights to life, liberty, and property; therefore, privatization is embraced in liberalism. Through the promulgation of unions as a strategy for privatization, public funding is limited, swapping it for privately owned social welfares. A study in Ontario of the Healthy Babies Healthy Children (HBHC) program discovered an increasing rate of social service providers undertaking privatization. By decreasing provincial federal funding, HBHC was transitioned from a publicly funded organization to a private means of public services. With the introduction of public services such as Canada Health and Social Transfer in 1995, provincial funding, education, and social welfare services were reduced significantly; encouraging provinces to establish public-private