Preview

Pros And Cons Of Proposition 213

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
465 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Proposition 213
Proposition 213 Exceptions

In California, it is mandatory for drivers to have liability coverage when operating a vehicle. But insurance gaps can happen. Many don’t even realize their insurance is lapsed. Proposition 213 limits the damages an uninsured driver can recover. However, there are exceptions where you can still be compensated.

What are the Exceptions of Prop 213?

Proposition 213 does not affect your ability to recover medical costs, lost wages, or damaged property from a car accident. It is designed to prevent uninsured drivers from collecting “general damages,” which include pain and suffering. But with the right attorney, there are still ways to fight the insurance company and maximize your compensation.

Prop 213 DOES NOT apply to the following:
• Passengers o Prop 213 exists to prevent uninsured drivers from receiving compensation. As a passenger, you are not bound
…show more content…
Discuss your case with our skilled injury attorneys to find all your options.

Examples include:
• Defective vehicles o If an accident was caused by a vehicle malfunction, a claim can be pursued with the automaker
• Public entity o A poorly maintained roadway may allow you to pursue a public entity claim

As an uninsured motorist, Proposition 213 creates serious challenges to your accident claim. Regardless of your insurance status, adjusters are highly skilled in limiting the damages you can recover. Even if you are qualified for compensation, insurance companies will hold your lack of coverage against you.

At Bergener Mirejovsky, we have successfully handled hundreds of Proposition 213 cases. We work tirelessly to make sure you receive the compensation you deserve. If you were an uninsured driver injured in a car collision, our knowledgeable injury attorneys are here to help you figure out all your options and maximize your settlement. Call us today at 1-800-881-2021 for your free

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Yes, all terms below are correct! Christopher will get a settlement amount of $5,711.20 now from State Farm. And after successfully subrogate the at fault party, Christopher will receive another $500. The payment of $350 for the car seat is to pay for the damaged car seat; it's not part of the total loss settlement. No loss of use and rental reimbursement.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under Mr. Frye’s automobile insurance policy’s definition of occupancy, Cameron was occupying the vehicle at the time of breaking his foot. A person is occupying a vehicle if they (A) have a relationship with the vehicle, and (B) have virtual contact with vehicle at the time of the accident. A. Cameron had a relationship with the vehicle by putting it on a jack and running it backwards by placing a concrete block on the gas pedal, and continuing to monitor the vehicle in the garage. An injured party needs to have a relationship or nexus exist between themselves and the insured vehicle at the time of the accident to have their injuries covered by the vehicle’s insurance policy. Salinas v. Econ.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grady Insurance Case

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mr. Stevens said while he was in Arizona he was a restrained driver when a car ran a red light hitting him on the driver side door, no airbags were deployed. He reported the he was evaluated at the scene by EMS. He said he hit his head…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order to determine the role of DD’s violation of the statute in the car accident the three-part negligence per se test must be applied to determine if . The three elements of the negligence per se test: whether the statute protects a class of individuals of which the Plaintiff is a member, protects against harm of the sort that the Plaintiff suffered, is an appropriate standard for use in the case. Applying this statute to the case it can be determined that the statute was created to protect the class of individuals such as the hitchhiker, i.e. passengers in other vehicles while DD was driving on the road in a tractor trailer truck which he was not licensed to drive. The state statute 101 was not created to prevent the type of harm that was suffered by the Plaintiff, the hitchhiker’s injury was caused by FF’s rear-ending DD and not by DD driving a tractor trailer truck. This is also not the appropriate standard for use in this case because the harm was not the result of violation of the standard. Therefore, the reasonable person standard should be applied instead of negligence per…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am sorry that you have had such a hard time and I am sorry that this happened to you. The lost wages were calculated to be $6671.00. The pain and suffering was calculated at $6700.00. The release is an incurred medical bills release. That means Progressive will resolve all of the accident related medical expenses prior to settlement. Once you settle your claim the claim is closed. Your credit rating is not specifically part of an uninsured motorist claim. It is difficult to calculate an accurate amount for pain and suffering. The amount is based on what claims with your injuries and complications have settled for in the past. What do you think the accurate amount is?…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    IRC § 165(a). Joe never allowed the insurance company an opportunity to cover this expense. In Bartlett v. United States, 397 F.Supp. 216 (D. Md.1975), the court disallowed a casualty loss deduction for damage to a personal automobile where the taxpayer declined to file an insurance claim although the taxpayer had a valid collision insurance policy. The court stated that the “economic loss the taxpayer sought to deduct did not arise from the causality, but rather arose from the taxpayer’s voluntary election not to claim or receive insurance proceeds to which the taxpayer was…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Deb's Case

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The main question here in this case is who is liable, negligent and damages. Deb is driving her car when it is involved in an accident with a car driven by Abe. A few moments after the first crash, a car driven by Ann hits the two cars disabled from the first crash. Cal, a passenger in Abe’s car has a minor injury to his head from the first crash but serious injury to his knees and legs from Ann’s subsequent driving into the first crash. Cal is taken to the hospital where Doctor informs him, correctly, that he will lose both legs unless he consents to an immediate particular type of surgery which may save his legs. Doctor does not inform Cal that this type of surgery, if successful, will mean that his repaired knees will need artificial…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The plaintiff is more than 50% negligent for his own injuries because he was not wearing a helmet therefore comparative negligence applies. To support the claim that the defendant was not wearing a helmet I believe that the seatbelt safety law can be presented to support the claim. Augst 2nd, 1985 the case of Hukill v. DiGregorio the court deemed the supporting claim of seatbelt as inadmissible based on the fact that seatbelts were not mandatory. In present day law not only in Illinois but throughout the entire United States failure to use your seatbelt is considered breaking the law and imposes a fine or citation for motorists who are caught not wearing the seatbelts. Based on the mandatory seatbelt for motorist presentation of such claim will make a strong defense for our client.…

    • 518 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    ADJ Midterm

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    violation of Section 22350 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law of the State of California, by driving…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Let's say a person was driving for company work and passed over a red signals. The accident causes injury to another driver. The company wouldn't be responsible for the accident for the reason that it didn't happen during employment. However, when that same driver operated…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fully describe each and every way in which you have been adversely affected by this accident, including but not limited to pain and suffering and the parts of your body affected thereby, loss of enjoyment of life, permanent injury, disfigurement or impairment, loss of mental faculties or capacity, impairment of earning capacity, and modification or cessation of activities.…

    • 3197 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Named Driver Exclusion

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With the potential to drive your car, these individuals could be considered when you are quoted insurance. When you live with a high-risk driver, you should consider adding a named driver exclusion to your…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Contract Law Assignment 3

    • 6715 Words
    • 27 Pages

    Chapleton hired two deck chairs, one of which collapsed injuring Chapleton, when hiring the deck chairs she has been given a ticket (headed receipt) and on the back was a clause excluding liability for any injuries.…

    • 6715 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is a risk you can not afford to take because you can be held liable for any accident that may occur on your property including injury or death.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meta Description: The law in Nevada protects consumers from being denied health insurance coverage based on intoxication.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays