Pros And Cons Of Reince Priebus

While the 14 Republican presidential candidates (soon to be 12 or less) two Sundays ago vented their objections to the debate formats, Reince Priebus (RNC Chairman) appears to care less about the conduct of the networks. So he apparently watched football on television instead, according to CNN reports. This is systemic of why all of the previous debates, especially the latest CNBC debate where the moderators asked provocative and debasing questions that didn’t define candidates, but crucified them as a bunch of blundering, ill-suited political buffoons that care more about disparaging each other than discussing the issues of the day. It is for this very reason I believe that Reince Priebus should be removed as the RNC Chairman and that new guidelines should be arranged for the balance of debates. Mr. Priebus actions showcase how indifferent the Republican National Committee is with the candidates now
Priebus had already cancelled one future debate with NBC News as a protest over what Republicans perceived as unfair treatment at the CNBC tilt last week. The candidates, notably Ben Carson and Donald Trump had even threatened to cancel their appearance if specific criteria weren’t met. The entire spectacle appears to be a disingenuous attempt by the media to have even legitimate grievances about the debate formats. Because these are not really debates, in the sense that they don’t allow candidates to fully articulate positions, but rather to deflect and defend themselves while attacking opponents’ positions. Reasoned arguments are nearly impossible with eleven people on a single stage, each one trying to stand out from the others. These debates are spectacles, entertainment for the masses and nothing more than excuses for partisans to do