Pros And Cons Of Sweatshops
Pertaining to the issue on Sweatshops overall, it always existed in the past and many employees, including women were taken advantage by employers under this concept. Throughout the course of time, many companies began to take their businesses to places other than the United States for that the price they will pay for production of goods would be a fraction of what they would pay if their business was in this country. In regards to the concept on Sweatshops overseas, it is certain that businesses are in search of their own interest, thus producing more goods and making increased profits, while only spending a fraction of the cost of production. Considering that changes in many aspects; especially in employment were certain, regarding sweatshops,
…show more content…
No. Sweatshops overall are deemed unethical for that as mentioned before, under this concept, employees are exposed to abuse by their employers. That is, many employees would be working very long hours and yet get compensated a fraction of what they deserve for their labor. According to Rara J. Radia and Martin Calkins of: The Struggle Against Sweatshops: Moving Toward Responsible Global Business, “Sweatshops are wrong for a host of reasons. They perpetuate the violation of basic human rights as people are exploited for their labor.” With this in mind, aside from the fact that people who are exploited by their employers are also denied any civil rights, which is deemed inhumane. In addition to the fact that under Sweatshops they are under compensated, most of the time, the working conditions are atrocious, where they are exposed to dangers of getting hurt on the job. In light of Sweatshops being ethical, Dennis G. Arnold and Laura P. Hartman of: Beyond Sweatshops: Positive Deviancy and Global Labor Practices, they argue otherwise. They believe that the concept of Sweatshops renders a positive outcome in terms of creating more employments overseas, thus boosting the economy. Arnold & Hartman mentions: “Many economists retort that the existence of sweatshops is an important and inevitable feature of economic development…” As mentioned before, they state that Sweatshops brings nothing else but economic improvements through the offering of
No. Sweatshops overall are deemed unethical for that as mentioned before, under this concept, employees are exposed to abuse by their employers. That is, many employees would be working very long hours and yet get compensated a fraction of what they deserve for their labor. According to Rara J. Radia and Martin Calkins of: The Struggle Against Sweatshops: Moving Toward Responsible Global Business, “Sweatshops are wrong for a host of reasons. They perpetuate the violation of basic human rights as people are exploited for their labor.” With this in mind, aside from the fact that people who are exploited by their employers are also denied any civil rights, which is deemed inhumane. In addition to the fact that under Sweatshops they are under compensated, most of the time, the working conditions are atrocious, where they are exposed to dangers of getting hurt on the job. In light of Sweatshops being ethical, Dennis G. Arnold and Laura P. Hartman of: Beyond Sweatshops: Positive Deviancy and Global Labor Practices, they argue otherwise. They believe that the concept of Sweatshops renders a positive outcome in terms of creating more employments overseas, thus boosting the economy. Arnold & Hartman mentions: “Many economists retort that the existence of sweatshops is an important and inevitable feature of economic development…” As mentioned before, they state that Sweatshops brings nothing else but economic improvements through the offering of