Preview

Prosecutors Role In The United States Criminal Justice System

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
201 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Prosecutors Role In The United States Criminal Justice System
In United States Criminal Justice System, all criminal cases need the Participation of the judge, counsel for the prosecution, and the counsel for the accused. Criminal justice system is incomplete with either of them not being present. Prosecutors value their power to seek justice for an accused person but sometimes they use it dishonestly. Prosecutors have so much power that they sometimes take advantage of and engage in misconduct.

prosecutor holds a critical stage in the criminal justice system and as well as playing a role before, during, and after a trial. Prosecutors also handle investigations, plead bargains, questioning both jurors, and witnesses, and being involved through the sentencing in criminal process. Their duty is to seek
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Checkpoint #6 Cjs/200
    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Checkpoint #6 Cjs/200

    First I will start off with the one who has all the authority, the judge. The judge is the one who makes all the rules. Next is the prosecuting attorney. The prosecuting attorney may also be known as the district attorney, state’s attorney, county attorney, commonwealth attorney or solicitor. The prosecuting attorneys duty is to conduct criminal proceedings on the behalf of the state or the people against those accused. The three main roles of the prosecutor are investigating crimes, to decide whether or not to instigate legal proceedings and to appear in court. All of the duties of a prosecutor may become too much for one person to handle so they supervise a staff of assistant district attorneys who do most of the work in the courtroom. The prosecuting attorney determines which cases to pursue by the amount of evidence that they gather. If the attorney cannot find enough evidence to get a conviction then they may make the decision to drop the case. Next is the defense attorney. The defense attorney is the one who represents the one being accused of a crime. Public defenders also represents those accused of crimes, however they are state employed lawyers.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    WK 3 Individual COURTROOM WORKGROUP
    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages

    WK 3 Individual COURTROOM WORKGROUP

    One of the important roles a judge, a criminal prosecutor, and a criminal defense attorney will carry out is called, a “courtroom work group”. The courtroom work group interact on a daily basis by these three entities joining together to converse over matters such as if the case has probable cause to convict the offender or whether or not if there is enough evidence to go forward with a criminal trial. Normally, the prosecutor will try to persuade the defense that they do not have a case or try to talk the defense into a guilty plea or possible bail. In other words, anything they can do to speed up the process with various types of negotiations. The judge has to remain ethical and fair to see both sides of the prosecution and defense to determine if the negotiations are valid enough to go through with. Even though the judge, prosecutor, and defense attorney are the main officials of the courtroom work group, we cannot forget about other members that play a part as well. The minor (respectfully) members or other members that make up a courtroom work group are the court clerk, the bailiff, and the court reporter. The court clerk upholds all the records while the court reporter makes sure he/she transcribes the official proceedings. The bailiff helps to keep court order throughout a trial. Although I can understand how the main officers discuss the case and try to solve it without a trial, I feel that every case should be heard. The major problem with this though is time and money. In order for every offender to have a case without the prosecutor trying to convince the defense into something else, there would have to be a lot more courthouses with a lot more main officers. The only way this would ever happen is to hike up the taxes and no one wants their taxes to increase.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ginger Robinson Week 6 Courtroom Players Response
    • 279 Words
    • 1 Page

    Ginger Robinson Week 6 Courtroom Players Response

    The prosecutor is accountable for exhibiting the state’s evidence as well as presenting and preparing the state’s case against the accused. It is also the prosecuting attorneys responsibility to decide which matters should be tried or not. It is the prosecutor who makes these determinations based on a several sets of criteria. Most prosecutors will study the evidence against the accused, study the crime, as well as many other factors.…

    • 279 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Domain Expansion Of Prosecutors
    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Domain Expansion Of Prosecutors

    The domain of prosecutors has been extended to provide greater authority. An example of domain expansion of the prosecutors is improving police-prosecutors relationships. Truthfully, police officers and prosecutors are looked at as the bad guys in the eyes of the public. They are both to serve justice, even though they have different perspectives on the law. For example, the police officers consider a case to be closed when the suspect is arrest, but the prosecutor needs obtain more information and evidence to win the case in court. Prosecutors depend off of the police to obtain a conviction; this all depends on how the police officers investigate and the quality of their arrests. Although both police officers and prosecutors have sought strategies…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Good People Be Prosecutors Analysis
    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Should Good People Be Prosecutors Analysis

    It is somewhat an oxymoron to consider yourself a prosecutor and a good person. Paul Butler writes describing the discrepancies with progressive prosecutors who believes they are able to change the “definition” of a prosecutor. Butler defines a prosecutor as someone one who is “more part of the problem than the solution” and a person who is “geared toward punishing people whose lives are already messed up.” Furthermore, Butler qualifies his definition of a prosecutor by saying the job of some prosecutors is to “mitigate the harshness of the system.” This is a failed attempt to mend the system because their principal work applies the criminal laws instead of ameliorating its negative effects.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judge and Criminal Justice Funnel
    • 682 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Judge and Criminal Justice Funnel

    During this paper I am going to be covering topics such as the courtroom work groups, the role of a prosecutor, the effects of the criminal justice funnel and the backlog of cases on the court system and the courtroom work group. Topics such as these are important to cover so that each individual has a complete understanding of the pros and cons of systems in the judicial system.…

    • 682 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Chart
    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Courtroom Chart

    | |Prosecutors, also known as district attorneys, |The prosecuting plays a very important role in the |…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Gideon V Wainwright Case
    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gideon V Wainwright Case

    The criminal justice system has come a long way in providing Due Process for all defendants. Amongst all the opinions, one thing runs the same; each and every defendant must be provided adequate representation for their criminal cases. Whether or not the client can provide their own, legal assistance must be provided as to ensure the defendant’s rights are protected. The right to adequate counsel should never be a luxury only affluent people can provide, but thanks to the Sixth Amendment, every citizen has a right…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper
    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper

    There are three main roles that a prosecutor utilizes. These are as follows; investigating crimes, evaluating them to determine whether a legal proceeding should be initiation on the basis of the available evidence or not and then appearing in the courtroom. The prosecutor uses the prosecutorial discretion process. Through this process, the prosecutor evaluates filed charges and corresponding testimonies and evidence before…

    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prosecution Vs. Defense
    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Prosecution Vs. Defense

    A prosecutor’s primary role is that of a minister of justice, and not simply that of an advocate in guarding the rights of the accused as well as enforcing the rights of the public (Tragos, n.d.). Of course, as a minister of justice and not that of an advocate, a prosecutor possesses the power of operating with few legal constraints regarding decision making, which accounts for the use of discretion. In contrast, defense counsel represent the accused of society, the role of the defense…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Role Of A Judge In The Criminal Justice Process
    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Role Of A Judge In The Criminal Justice Process

    The responsibilities of a judge in the criminal justice process consist of a variety of duties; no court judge have just one duty or job to complete on a daily bases. Some of these duties include determining probable cause, signing warrants, informing suspects of their rights, setting and revoking bail, arraigning defendants, and accepting guilty pleas. When a judge is not in court, most of the time, they are negotiating dispositions with prosecutors and defense attorneys. The most important responsibility is to ensure suspects and defendants are treated fairly in compliance with Due Process of Law. In a jury trial the judge is responsible for allowing the jury a fair chance to reach a verdict. Before releasing them to deliberate or discuss…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Role Of Plea Bargaining In Criminal Justice
    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Role Of Plea Bargaining In Criminal Justice

    Kathryn’s duty to do justice as the prosecutor, also applies during plea bargaining, whereby, a persons guilt must be established based on proof beyond a reasonable doubt. As such, the prosecutor’s primary objective “is to avoid punishing an innocent person. Because a prosecutor is obligated to act in all stages in the criminal justice process consistently with the sovereign's view that it is more important to avoid punishing the innocent, this principle applies to a prosecutor's efforts in resolving cases pre-trial” (Stern 1034). Regardless of how confident the prosecutor is of the defendant’s guilt, the prosecutor must ensure he does not offer a plea bargain that would result in an innocent individual to plead guilty as such an offer would subordinate the purpose of preventing an innocent individual from being punished to that of punishing a guilty individual, “thereby failing to strike the balance that justice requires” (Stern 1035). O’Hear suggests that a defendant should have the opportunity to convey their side of the story in order for the defendant to avoid getting convicted if they are innocent. It would also be beneficial to enhance the defendants perceptions of procedural justice by developing an objective criteria in order to direct plea negotiations and explain the prosecutors…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Justice System: An Overview
    • 5065 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Criminal Justice System: An Overview

    In Criminal Justice System there are few components. Every component plays an important role in our system functions. The Law Enforcement responds to crime which is reported and takes necessary measures to investigate and make an arrest if the suspect is found. When the suspect is booked, the court will get involved, a prosecutor will review facts of the case and charge the suspect, the defendant will go in front of a judge, it will either be settle for a plea bargain or taken for a chance of a trail. After that defendant will either enter into a jail or prison to serve their time or be placed on probation or alternative to incarcerating.…

    • 5065 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Courtroom work group week 3
    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Courtroom work group week 3

    There are many parts of the courtroom work group professionals who successfully pursuit justice and the process of convicting a criminal. The courtroom work group has a major role in convicting and finalizing a case. In the courtroom work group, there are three groups of people that hold the entire courtroom together. Without the work group, the courtroom would not flow, and coming to a conclusion to the case would not be as easy. The work group is made up of the Judge, the Defense Attorney, Public Defender, Court Recorders, and the Prosecutor Attorney. Which all are part of the courtroom work group which they work together to reach a decision, in the case by interacting among themselves and who’s involved an implicit recognition and rule of civility, cooperation, and sharing their goals. There are many roles in the work group, and if they are not all followed through with then the results could be different than what they should be. In this paper, we will look at the roles of the prosecutor, how the criminal justice funnel effects the courtroom work group and what will help eliminate the funnel and reduce the backlog of cases.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Negotiation
    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plea Negotiation

    The prosecutor represents the general public in regards to both ensuring justice is administered and ensuring that the procedures of law are honored by all parties. At times these duties act as adversaries with no regard for the difficult position of humanity in prosecution. Accused individuals are affected by plea negotiations due to the uncertainty or opportunity the process provides. If I feel guilty should I accept the plea regardless of the actual charge I’m pleading guilty to? Do I take the opportunity of a lesser charge and a shorter sentence, or risk a trial where I’m unsure of the outcome? Lastly, victims and families of victims are affected by plea bargains. A plea bargain can reduce the confidence that the victim has in the system if the defendant is given a lesser charge, in exchange for what seems like the inconsequential acceptance of guilt. It is not common practice to disclose the terms or reasoning of a plea agreement to the general public. This secrecy breeds an unease in society that can undermine the realistic and necessary function of plea negotiations.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics