Preview

Pullman Strike Vs Chicago Newspaper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1360 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pullman Strike Vs Chicago Newspaper
History of events have been documented in many ways, newspaper is a form of documentation of historical events for the public to view, but Harry S Truman, the 33rd President of the United States, stated about the dangers of newspaper, “You can never get all the facts from just one newspaper, and unless you have all the facts, you cannot make proper judgements about what is going on.” The Chicago Tribune and The Chicago Times, both of which are prominent newspapers of Chicago, recorded relevant information about Eugene Debs and his contribution to the Pullman Strike. Both newspapers only recorded some facts that supported their newspaper’s views of the event that happened over the few month of the nationwide strikes. Eugene Debs was described …show more content…
The Chicago Tribune wrote multiple articles about how Eugene Debs was a dictator and planned out violence strifes across the nations with the strikers at his disposal. The Chicago Time, a newspapers publication that was all for the Pullman Strike and the ARU had conflicting articles with the The Chicago Tribune. Eugene Debs is framed as a mastermind of the violences that occurred throughout the few months that Pullman Strikes transpired nationwide from articles from The Chicago Tribune. In the headlines of The Chicago Tribune issue of June 28, 1894 and July 1, 1894, it depicted Eugene Debs as dictator with his warfare(plans) for the strikers is used effectively and that they began a work of destruction. In later article of Issue of July 7,1894, a massive fire breaks out in one of the rail yards that held about 600-700 freight cars. The Chicago Tribune blamed this on the rioters that supported the ARU and wrote, “This work the rioters did calmly and systematically. They seemed to work with a deliberate plan” (Pullman Strike pdf, 73). The Chicago Times also covered the same event on the same issue dated, but with conflicting evidences, “But the perpetrators are not American Railway Union men. The people engaged in this outrageous work of destruction are not strikers … The persons who set the fire yesterday … are young hoodlums” (Pullman Strike pdf, 74). The Chicago Tribune did not have …show more content…
After being arrested a few days later after the fire in the rail yard, Eugene Debs released a statement about the protest. The Chicago Times issue on July 15, 1894, the headlines stated that Debs still think they could still win and said that battle has yet begun. The article went over his what he planned to do from then on, “I propose to work harder than ever before ,,, We must unite as strong as iron, but let us peaceable in this contest. Bloodshed is unwarranted and will not win. It is not by blood that we want to win” (Pullman Strike pdf, 75). Eugene Debs proposed that from then on he will work with all remaining people in the Union for a better cause for them in a peaceful action and not by violent intentions. With this final proposition he marked this day as an American Hero for labor workers and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    dbq's for APUSH 1848-1920

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    D) Government affected organized labor as well. Haymarket Square, Knights of Labor were protesting when a bomb exploded by an anarchist and this was blamed on the K of L. Homestead Steel plant, strikers were trying to kill the head of plant when detectives from gvt were sent to restore order. Pullman strike of 1893.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nation's economy was falling flat in a sadness and on Labor Day 1893 John Altgeld said, "Times will be deteriorating." John Altgeld chose to permit laid off workers to contend among themselves for openings for work; be that as it may, he included, "Let me say that it will be the obligation of every open authority to see to it that no man is allowed to starve on the dirt of Illinois. " When strikes happened in Illinois, Governor Altgeld sent the state civilian army out to control mobs and dissents in which individuals were utilizing compel or felt debilitated. An apparently little episode began on May 11, 1894, when 2000 representatives of the Pullman Company went on strike. The police did not ask for that state troops sent to subdue the dissents.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1893, Debs traded in his Grand Secretary hat in order to establish the American Railway Union (ARU), which struck the Great Northern Railway, winning most of their demands, in spring of 1894. When times became tough, The Pullman Palace Car Company cut wages in half. Workers voted to strike, after members of a grievance committee met with Pullman with a list of demands. Debs advised caution, but a nationwide boycott of Pullman cars was supported by the ARU delegates.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APUSH DBQ1 Labor Unions

    • 1111 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the mid-1800s, the National Labor Union was formed to unify workers in fighting for higher wages, lowered work hours, and various other social causes. However, this sets the stage for many failing unions to come. One of the first major strikes in this period would include the Great Railroad Strike. In the late 1800s, railroad workers from across the country participated in an enormous strike that resulted not only in mass violence, but also very few reforms. An editorial in The New York Times stated: "[T]he strike is apparently hopeless, and must be regarded as nothing more than a rash and spiteful demonstration of resentment by men too ignorant or too reckless to understand their own interests…" (Document B). This editorial, which was clearly in favor of labor reforms, was acknowledging that this method of reform was unsuccessful for the laborers at this time. A failure of this magnitude so early on in the movement should have been enough cease its continuation; however, year after year, strikes were breaking and little was being done in the workers’ favor. Another major strike would be the Homestead Strike and Lockout. In the late 1800s,…

    • 1111 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jerome Grossman’s call for a general strike, if the war was still going by October, is what sparked the moratorium movement.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The rise of industrialization in the late nineteenth century saw an increasing need for the labor supply in the U.S. Quickly a division formed between the ownership of new businesses and those who supplied the labor for them. In the novel In Dubious Battle, John Steinbeck focuses on a strike set in the California apple country. Albeit historical fiction, the novel holds true as it represents the countless times ownership has exploited its workers in the avaricious attempt to secure additional revenues. As well, the novel examines the inner workings of a strike and the difficulties that went along with running one. A lack of resources, clearly defined goals, and in-fighting amongst members made an already arduous fight even more so difficult. It was the mistreatment and manipulation of workers that lead to the rise of labor movements and their battles for egalitarianism. Labor unions would come to be, such as the American Federation of Labor (AFL), which fought to advance the interests and basic human needs of workers through sheer numbers. Akin to the novel, these groups of workers took direct action as they participated in events like the Homestead and Pullman strikes. These feats taken by the labor supply demonstrate their motivations and goals, as well as the fact of how quickly problems developed for organized labor, and how those problems could mean the end for their fight. A two sided battle, organized labor faced stern opposition from ownership and the government, as well as from within itself; all making the critical task of obtaining “social equality” one of great significance and adversity.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The leaders of the Labour Party were terrified by the revolutionary elements within the union movement or at least worried about the damage association with them would do to their newly established reputation as a more moderate party of government and were unhappy about the proposed general strike. During the next two days, frantic efforts were made to reach an agreement with the government and the mine owners. However, these efforts failed, mainly owing to an eleventh-hour decision by printers of the Daily Mail to refuse to print an editorial ("For King and Country") condemning the general strike. They objected to the following passage: "A general strike is not an industrial dispute. It is a revolutionary move which can only succeed by destroying the government and subverting the rights and liberties of the people". When Baldwin heard of this, he called off the negotiations with the TUC, saying that the printers' action was interfering with the liberty of the press.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role that the federal government played in the period surrounding the strike was mainly to help factory owners put an end on strikes. According to President Grover Cleveland, he believed that the Pullman strike was wasteful, disruptive and unlawful (Hewitt and Lawson, pg. 556). He thought that the Pullman trouble originated because neither the public nor the government had taken acceptable measures to control monopolies and corporations and had failed to “reasonably protect the rights of labor and redress its wrongs” (Hewitt and Lawson, pg. 556). Cleveland also sent warnings to prevent the strikes. Because of this, the government created some policies. They also imported tariffs (class notes). Some of these policies were the Sherman Anti-Trust…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since there was no groundwork to rationalize and show examples of the success of organized labor, it was nearly impossible to make it work at this time. If unions were going to work, striking would have to be effective and clearly, they weren't. In the 1860's, the National Labor Union was formed to unify workers in fighting for higher wages, an 8 hour work day and various social causes and it set the stage for many failing unions to come. In 1877, railroad workers in this union from across the country took part in an enormous strike that resulted in mass violence and very few reforms. Afterwards, a editorial in The New York Times stated: "the strike is apparently hopeless, and must be regarded as nothing more than a rash and spiteful demonstration of resentment by men too ignorant or too reckless to understand their own interests" (Document B). This editorial, which was clearly in favor of labor reforms, was acknowledging that this method of fighting was not going to work for the laborers at this time. A failure of this magnitude so early on in the movement should have been enough to put it to halt, however, year after year, strikes were breaking and little was being done in the workers favors. In 1892, workers at the Homestead Steel Plant near Pittsburg walked…

    • 989 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beginning in the 1860’s, labor unions began to sprout in hopes of making reforms by unifying workers to fight for higher wages, and 8 hour work day, and various other social benefits. The National Labor Union (1866) was the first assembly established to take part in this fight. Strikes would have to be effective in order to initiate any major changes but at a time like this, more harm was being done than good. In 1877, many workers participated in the first great American strike which resulted in mass violence and little reforms. Afterwards, an editorial in the New York Times stated that “the strike is apparently hopeless, and must be regarded as nothing more than a rash and spiteful demonstration of resentment by men too ignorant or too reckless to understand their own interests…” (Document B) This editorial, which clearly favored labor unions, was acknowledging that…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The panic of 1983, an economic recession that inadvertently begins a domino effect in the town would soon lead to the Pullman Strike. As a result of this, Pullman wasn’t making the money he wanted, and henceforth decided to cut his workers’ wages in order to continue his increase in profits the way he…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pullman Strike

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pullman Strike was a nationwide conflict in the summer of 1894 between the new American Railway Union (ARU) and railroads that occurred in the United States. It shut down much of the nation's freight and passenger traffic west of Detroit, Michigan. The conflict began in the town of Pullman, Illinois, on May 11 when nearly 4,000 employees of the Pullman Palace Car Company began a wildcat strike in response to recent reductions in wages. Most factory workers who built Pullman cars lived in the planned worker community of Pullman. The industrialist George Pullman had designed it as a model community, but he controlled it thoroughly. When his company laid off workers and lowered wages, it did not reduce rents, and the workers called for a strike. They had not formed a union.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Pullman Case

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1894 a strike known as ‘the Pullman strike’ took place. It was destructive and revolutionary, involving both the employees who protested and their employer, George Pullman. The employees felt that Pullman was taking advantage of them, so they joined the American Railroad Union (ARU). This caused a lot of mixed feelings and many people had different perspectives on the event. Several different views can be observed when analyzing this case and its consequences. All of these views can be analyzed by interpreting first-hand accounts and documents from the time of the incident.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Haymarket Riot

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On May Day 1886, the workers at the McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. in Chicago began a strike in the hope of gaining a shorter work day. On…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Haymarket Affair

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    On May 1st, 1886 tens of thousands of supporters flocked to Chicago with the hopes of making the city the epicenter of the movement. This day in history is also the root of the International Workers’ Day of May Day, more colloquially known as May Day (***). Of those in attendance include reformists, socialists, anarchists, labor union members, and typical workers combining to form a crowd of approximately 35,000 people (***). Over the next few days thousands of more workers joined the movement and several protests, strikes, parades, and rallies were held attracting the attention of the Chicago police department. On May 3rd, police responded to a protest at the McCormick Reaper Factory which was being led by well-known anarchist, August Spies (***). The strike was peaceful until a group of protestors attempted to confront the police which caused police to open fire on the crowd, causing the death of at least two people (***). During his trial, Spies testified that he “knew from experience of the past that this butchering of people was done for the express purpose of defeating the eight hour movement” (***). Regardless of the reason why the police opened fire, the protestors only grew angrier; leaving some to seek revenge. The next day, May 4th, some of these vindictive protestors began distributing fliers [see Figure 1.0] calling for a “mass meeting” in the Haymarket district…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays