Pushing Back Against Teen Culture Analysis

Gregston wrote an article titled “Pushing Back Against a Teen Culture of Entitlement”. Gregston has many years of experience dealing with adolescents and families. He is an author, speaker, and radio host. Along with this, he is the founder of a residential counseling center for troubled teens. The main purpose of the article is to bring awareness of teen culture entitlement. As for the thesis, the author indicates various ways of how a parent can put an end to the teen behavior. Based upon his claims, Gregston's main arguments is everyone is born selfish and narcissistic. Furthermore, he claims the parents have allowed their children to act upon the sense of entitlement with no means of consequences. In brief summarization, Stone organizes his article in a way for him to state his claim, present reasoning, and then follow up with a solution.
As an example, Stone wrote everyone is born selfish and narcissistic. To provide reasoning to such a bold statement he goes on by mentioning from the day we were born we cry regardless if our parents are tired or not. Following the reasoning, he then begins to state ways this can be changed. The effective use of organization allows the article to flow smoothly from one topic
to another while still staying intertwine and focused in the implied thesis. The article has many valid points; however, the author fails to mention different scenarios on what can cause a teenager to feel entitled.
Moreover, Gregstone uses past experiences to get his point across. Consequently with his experience as a counselor for the youth and families, his experiences display much an in depth meaning rather than a biased view. As for credentials, he and his wife have been actively working with the younger generation for many years. Along with this, he has been a youth minister and speaker. A way Gregston persuades the reader is through his many experiences and connections he can make with parents.
Despite the use of good organization in his article, his evidence is not thoroughly backed up. His evidence is based upon his accounts with students who think they are entitled. For Gregston to state entitlement is teen culture is a bit absurd and rash. Also, he fails to mention different circumstantial environments that might cause a teen to feel this sense of entitlement. The only reasoning Gregstone offers is through his mention of how teen are being spoiled. The quick and judgment statement is a fallacy. He uses numerous of fallacies that dampen his overall claims of teen culture of entitlement. Another weakness, is his failure to describe different scenarios.
The author failed to mention how kids would react differently if they were raised by a single parents or even a guardian. How would these factors change how a teenager acts? Also, the author does not seem open to the fact that self entitlement can be good at times. His basis is viewed only his way with no accountabilities of the children he talks about. If the author were to sit down and talk to the teenager, he would then find the exact reason why a teenager may act self entitled. For all that can be assumed, a child may not act self entitled based upon being spoiled by their parents or guardians. The suggestions Gregstons claim is a bit biased and quite frankly only an
assumption. In the final analysis of Gregson's article “Pushing Back Against Teen Culture of Entitlement” overall, shows sufficient organization and an adequate about of credentials. Besides the lack of exploring new topics and evaluating different scenarios of why a teenager may act self entitles, his reasonings seem most logical based on his experiences. Notably, the article can help influence a college student understand the top of entitlement among the teen culture through Gregston's superb organization. The article broken down tnto a way where most individuals can read text and see the logical reasoing behind his claims.