Preview

Putin's Military Buildup Of The Soviet Era

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1091 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Putin's Military Buildup Of The Soviet Era
Putin’s presidency has always retained elements of theatricality. Ever since his inauguration, the State orchestrates every public appearance he makes in order to portray him as a robust figure that contrasts starkly from the decrepit Yeltsin. Putin’s power, after he instituted the “vertical of power” and picked all the members of his advisory body, is minimally regulated: if he wants something he just takes it and does not explain his rationale to anyone (Dawisha 272-273). In this regard, he is very similar to the tsars before the 1917 Revolution. Putin is undoubtedly a product of the Soviet era and his leadership demonstrates elements of continuity of the past through his buildup of the Russian military, his expansionist foreign policies, and manipulation of the media. …show more content…
During the Cold War, Russia was practically involved in every war that the US had participated in and made their presence known globally. As such, Putin’s objective is to restore Russia’s credibility abroad by re-establishing control over what he “claims is part of Russia’s territory (Vice). Even if the said territory is disputed, he would resort to aggressive tactics in order to protect Russia’s interests. Russia’s invasion of Crimea, a Ukrainian territory, serves as a prime example of demonstrating Putin’s eagerness to use his military in order to safeguard Russia’s interests. Putin was willing to violate Ukraine’s sovereignty, the most important international relations law, and it is no coincidence that Ukraine used to be part of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The beginning of the 20th century brought radical changes to the social and political structure of autocratic Russia. It was a period of regression, reform, revolution and eradication. Eradication of a blood line that had remained in rule for over 300 years; the Romanov Dynasty. The central figure of this eradication was Tsar Nicholas II, often described as an incompetent leader, absent of the “commanding personality nor the strong character and prompt decision which are so essential to an autocratic ruler...” (Sir G. Buchman, British ambassador to Russia from 1910 in H. Seton-Watson, The Decline of Imperial Russia, 1964, p.108) What caused or defined the decline and eventual fall of the Romanov dynasty cannot concluded by one influencing factor but an amalgamation of Tsar’s leadership, certain events that impacted on Russia and Revolutionary groups that aided this process. From these it is evident though that Tsar Nicholas’ role, to a major extent, was the key factor in the end of the 300-year reigning Romanov rule and subsequent execution. In exploring Russia in the early 20th Century, the revolutionary groups, mainly including the Bolsheviks, can be seen as having a minor role in that actual reason for the decline of the Romanov dynasty but rather a larger role in the events after the fall, in regards to the execution itself and shaping Russia’s future afterwards.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He implores the American people to contemplate about "innocent victims," a "modern wave of terrorism," and the battle that one day can "plague greater than Syria 's borders" (Putin, APFCFR). This statement advocates his audience to recognize the consequences of their preceding military conflict and to create connections with current disputes to ones that occurred in the past. Putin then provides a prospective not relating towards the United States. When not directly accusing the United States of exacerbating international conflicts he permits his audience to acknowledge that their government provides "foreign weapons," which have contributed to one of the "bloodiest wars in the world" (Putin, APFCFR). This statement is perhaps the most compelling Putin makes. He does this because he acknowledges Americans as strong-willed individuals who can take action into their hands; he wants them to reason with themselves and promote ideals genuine to humans as a…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicholas II was the last czar of Russia. He was born on the 6th of May 1868 and this day, ominously, turned out to be the Orthodox feast day of St. Job the Sufferer. This seemed to foretell the dangerous and troublesome life that Nicholas had ahead of him (“Czar”). Unlike his father Alexander Alexandrovich Romanov, a giant and intimidating leader, Nicholas was merely 5’6” and had a gentle personality. He was one of the best educated monarchs in Europe because his parents foresaw the obstacles of the 20th century and prepared him for every challenge that he might face. Terrorism constantly threatened the royal family. Nicholas was always surrounded by guards and grew up being very isolated from the outside world. After joining the military, which was expected of him, he enjoyed his carefree life by drinking and attending parties (Hunsucker). Irresponsibility, negligence, and separation from his people kept him from being a successful leader.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For more than two centuries, Russia and the United States have shared a diplomatic relationship. Whether that involved trading or the military. Foreign relations between the former Soviet Union and the United States were driven by a complex set of ideologies, political agendas, and economic factors, which led to the superpower rivalry that has been on display over the past two-hundred years. Presidents from both nations have been involved, from President Ronald Reagan to most recently, President Barack Obama. For Russia, the most well-known leader was Vladimir Putin, the “geopolitical wrecking ball.”…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia did give up some of its nuclear weapons from the Soviet controlled states of Ukraine and Kazakhstan, but the country has still continued to maintain its much larger arsenal of nuclear warheads. Likewise, the United States has done nothing to reduce their arsenal of warheads but has instead invested billions to modernize these weapons. NATO, the organization created for the sole purpose of preventing Soviet invasion, has done nothing about the territorial ambitions of now Russian president Vladimir Putin. Putin’s annexation of Crimea and invasion of Ukraine has been met only with Western leaders denouncing his actions, but doing nothing to combat them. This is the same response that the Soviet Union’s actions were met with throughout the Cold War. Public denouncing of their actions was the response from both sides when the other did something they did not approve of. The reason why is the same reason why it’s the case today as well. The fear of nuclear destruction is still present, maybe even more so now then 25 years ago. We like to believe that since the collapse of the Soviet Union the threat of nuclear warfare just magically went away, but the reality is that it has stayed in play with no end in…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The collapse of the United Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) led to the formation of a new democratic state. The Russian federation has had three different presidents since its formation and the ratification of its constitution in 1993. The Russian president’s role in the creation of foreign and domestic policies lies within the Russian constitution (Federation, 2013). However, not all presidents have addressed issues in the same manner. The first Russian president, Boris Yeltsin, was unsuccessful at fixing the broken Russian economy and uniting its government to establish a strong foreign policy. Yeltsin’s failure to lead the biggest country on the planet led to his resignation in 1999. His resignation allowed the Russian prime minister of the time to take power of the Russian Federation. His name is Vladimir Putin. This article will discuss some of Vladimir Putin’s approaches on international security issues that…

    • 2937 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was it the acts of Truman and Churchill rather than that of Stalin that brought the cold war to a start?…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Massimo Calabresi’s “Troublemaker” is an article about Putin and his relations with the United States. The article contains several complex topics but there is one imminent goal, to expose the efforts Russia is making in degrading the standard of professionalism carried by the United States. Calabresi writes to an audience that is the typical United States citizen. Mr. Calabresi has proven his credibly by the several documentaries and articles that he has previously done for TIME magazine. Massimo Calabresi is the senior correspondent for TIME magazine therefore his title is backed with years of credible and interesting articles. Calabresi starts creating his credibility by providing reputable sources, citing straight facts, and successfully catering to emotional appeals; however, around the end of the article, his attempts to appeal to…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Is Mr Putin A Hero

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the 1980’s Americans at home and millions of Russians living in the Soviet Union said U.S. President Ronald Reagan was a great communicator because he was the first to openly say the Soviet Union was an “evil empire” that must be defeated. However, in today’s Russia, a high percent of Russians regret the Soviet Union collapse which was so relentlessly pursued by the United States. Mr. Putin has called the empire’s break-up “A national tragedy of enormous scale.” This conflict made Mr. Reagan’s Presidency controversial, some saw him as a hero while others saw him as a zealot wanting all the power. People can be seen as a hero to some and a villain to others because of their actions and how they are perceived.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paul Keating

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Paul Keating’s commemoration speech at the funeral of the Unknown Soldier carefully utilises rhetoric technique to persuade the greater part of Australia to reflect on the great sacrifice made by those who served our nation. The epideictic format and inclusive language engages the audience, whilst anonymity of the unknown solider establishes curiosity, capturing pathos both within the speaker and the audience.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cold War in 1980s

    • 3497 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Zigfeld, Kim. "Putin 's Russia: Still an Empire, Still Evil." Articles:. N.p., 11 Mar. 2013.…

    • 3497 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Cold Blood

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Few authors have the skill to express their view of a setting without straightforwardly telling the audience. In this small passage from In Cold Blood, Truman Capote very eloquently does just that, describing the look and feel of Holcomb, Kansas through words. With Capote’s use of many elements like figurative language, imagery, and detain, he reveals his original but mysterious views on the scenery of Holcomb. All while describing this content town, Capote builds up for a drastic change to end the excerpt.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperium Summary

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kapuściński’s book Imperium details his experience in Soviet Russia during the height of Stalinism, after the Berlin Wall fell, and after the fall of the Soviet Union in its entirety. Kapuściński was a Polish journalist who was seven when he first experienced the wrath of the Soviet Union, an experience that colors how Kapuściński sees the Soviet Union later on in this book and his life. The word ‘imperium’ that is found several times throughout this book and is the title is defined by Kapuściński to be mean the Soviet Union itself; his view of the Soviet Union is that it is one of the most horrific regimes in human history because it exploited many diverse cultures of people who were prone to bowing to overbearing regimes and found themselves…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Romanov Dynasty

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A conglomeration of domestic issues – amplified by an incompetent leadership in Nicholas II and the parasitic Rasputin – came together to bring 300 years of autocracy to an end. Russia had been ready for change, and the Romanovs had paid the ultimate price. Sources A, B, and C all display differing perspectives of the causes for the collapse of the Romanov dynasty, each with associated judgements on origin, bias, and motive but hold value to the discussion nonetheless. Thus, the fall of the Romanovs was systematic, abdication for Nicholas II inevitable and the winds of change again can be studied by historians and the public to acknowledge this momentous…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a span of forty-four years, Anton Chekhov, witnessed the rule of three Tsars i.e. Alexander II, Alexander III, and Nicholas II. The reign of these Romanovs was bombarded by numerous dilemmas such as wide peasant unrest, revolutionary agitation, anarchic disorders, and even of industrialisation. Along with their obligations to ‘remedy’ the social ills affecting such a massive and heterogeneous empire, they were also battling to preserve their unlimited power.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays