Preview

Questions on Foreign Investments and US Markets

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
943 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Questions on Foreign Investments and US Markets
What are the benefits for foreign firms to cross list in the US markets? Do the benefits remain after the SOX? Do you think the benefits would remain unchanged after the worldwide adoption of IFRS?

Foreign companies are always looking for a new country to plant a flag and expand their global market place. One of the ways that they do this in the business world is through a process called cross listing. This practice allows a company owned and operated in Country A to list their company in Country B’ s financial trading exchange. Some have argued that introduction of Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) and the ongoing plans of convergence between US GAAP and IFRS have decreased the need for cross listing. While there is a difference of opinion as to whether or not the practice is still beneficial is this day an age; I tend to believe that even if the benefits are not as robust as they once were they are worth the investment Cross listing is when a corporation “lists its equity shares on one or more foreign stock exchange in addition to its domestic exchange.” (Wikipedia, 2013) The practice became very popular in the in 80’s and hit its peak in the 1990’s. Research has uncovered a number of benefits and reasons for cross listing. Three models were established to show the benefits of cross listing. They are the market segmentation / investor recognition model, the liquidity model, and the shareholder protection / legal bonding model. (Weisbach, Reese, 2002)
When it comes to discussing the benefits of cross listing in the United States. Some of the benefits are as follows: The first is that it will increase the visibility of company in a global scale. (Zhu, Small, 2007) Changing the visibility of a company from national to global offers a company a larger audience who may not have been familiar with a company in the past. Second, companies can gain access to liquid markets. (Zhu, Small, 2007) A foreign company in a developing country may not have enough liquidity in its



Bibliography: "Cross Listing." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 17 Jan. 2013. Web. 20 Jan. 2013. Dobbs, Richard, and Marc Goedhart. "Why Cross-listing Shares Doesn 't Create Value." McKinsey Quarterly Autumn 2008 29 (2008): n. pag. Print. Reese, William, Jr., and Michael Weisbach. "Protection of Minority Shareholder Interests, Cross-listings in the United States, and Subsequent Equity Offerings." NBER. Journal of Financial Economics, 2002. Web. 20 Jan. 2013. Zhu, Hong, and Ken Small. "Has Sarbanes-Oxley Led to a Chilling in the U.S. Cross-Listing Market." Has Sarbanes-Oxley Led to a Chilling in the U.S. Cross-Listing Market. The CPA Journal, Mar. 2007. Web. 20 Jan. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Sarbanes Oxley Memo

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As consultants for Ancher Public Trading (APT), Learning Team A would like to discuss the implications of the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) legislation. This memorandum provides a brief history of SOX¡¦s creation, explains the relationship amongst the FASB, SEC and PCAOB, describes the pros and cons of SOX, assesses the impacts of SOX, and lists ethical considerations of SOX.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I have written this report in order to fulfill my graduation requirements at Southwestern College. Also to become more knowledgeable on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) and the impact it has had on the business world.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ever since the introduction of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) in 2002 there have been debates over the benefits and drawbacks of such a legislation. While they really isn’t much we can do about it now as its being already enforced the arguments still stands.…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sec's Rule 78j-1

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 directed the SEC to adopt a new rule to require national securities exchanges and national securities associations to prohibit listing an issuer’s security unless the issuer complies with audit committee requirements relating to independence; overseeing the independent auditor; establishing procedures to handle complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters; the authority to engage counsel and other advisers; and funding for the independent auditor and outside advisers as the committee deems necessary [See Exhibit…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mr Zhang

    • 42353 Words
    • 170 Pages

    The introduction of Sarbanes-Oxley issues has been accomplished in two ways. First, case content has been altered to include Lakeside’s consideration of financing expansion through an initial public offering, and the resulting impact such a decision would have on Lakeside and on Abernathy and Chapman, CPAs. Second, the discussion questions and exercises have been expanded to include consideration of Sarbanes-Oxley and new auditing and independence standards, both by adding a section in the end-of-chapter material and by reference in the other questions where appropriate. The following list includes all the questions with the location of the question and a brief learning objective.…

    • 42353 Words
    • 170 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    References: Peluso, R. (Mar/Apr 2004), The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, ABA Trust & Inveltments, Washington Vol 98 pg 10, 5 pgs, retrieved from Proquest, 19 Apr 2005…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    SARBANES OXLEY ACT 2002

    • 1374 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: American Institute of CPAs. (2006 – 2014). Section 404B of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Retrieved from AICPA: American Institute of CPAs: http://www.aicpa.org/advocacy/issues/pages/section404bofSOX.aspx…

    • 1374 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 5 Article Review

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages

    RE: Nogler, G., & Inwon, J. (2011, May/June). Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Was the ’one-size-fits-all’ approach justified? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance (Wiley), 22(4), 65-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.20691…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Acctounting

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By 2010, foreign companies will be able to file on U.S. Stock Exchanges using IFRS standards.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Is it generally worthwhile for a non-US company to get listed on a U.S. exchange? What are the advantages? How this is done? What are ADR 's?…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Boeing Financial Analysis

    • 6640 Words
    • 27 Pages

    Ross, S., Westerfield, R., & Jaffe, J. (2010). Corporate Finance (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.…

    • 6640 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Royal Dutch and Shell Case

    • 1960 Words
    • 6 Pages

    High Street Global Advisors, a global investment management organization is trying to understand the opportunities presented by the Royal Dutch/Shell pricing discrepancy. This case analyzes the benefits of shares of two twin companies Royal Dutch and Shell. Royal Dutch trades are more actively in the Netherlands and U.S. markets, whereas Shell trades are more actively in the United States. They are getting price benefit mainly from arbitrage opportunities arising from daily stock price difference between the prices of twin equities that cross-listed in different European stock markets. For example, a U.S. (Dutch) investor can buy Royal Dutch and Shell in New York (Amsterdam). …

    • 1960 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Royal Dutch Shell

    • 1221 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Background. Royal Dutch Shell Group is one of the world’s largest oil corporations and one of the largest companies in Europe. The company was created as a result of a merge between Netherlands’ Royal Dutch and UK’s Shell Corporation. The case looks at the issue of price differentials between several equity listings in different markets from the perspective of investors seeking an arbitrage opportunity. Royal Dutch trades more actively in the Netherlands and U.S. markets, whereas Shell trades more actively in the United States. The result is that the Royal Dutch/Shell relative price moves positively with the Netherlands and U.S. markets and negatively with the U.K. market.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Impact of Cross Listing

    • 4104 Words
    • 17 Pages

    According to Kent et al (2002); globalization of financial markets has resulted in increase in the number of firms choosing to cross list. Bruno (2004) also argues that the pressure of economic globalization is pushing companies to access foreign capital markets.…

    • 4104 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    high frequency trading

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    trading frequency but not on its value. More firms are trying to profit from cross-market…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics