The founding fathers wanted to create a constitution because many believed that the national government had to be stronger than what it had been with the use of the Articles of Confederation. But at the same time they were fearful of human nature and how often it could be seen in the history of other countries such as Britain, for people in the position of power to infringe on the rights of others, by becoming hungry with power. Taking this into account, they wanted to create a government with another power to keep order and to govern. But also make sure there were sufficient checks put in place so that the government could never exercise power that threatens individual liberties. The constitution created a government with a written set of rules to follow which it could not infringe upon. This in itself was one way to create a limited government, which is a main factor in why the founding fathers created a constitution. The Founding fathers also wanted to divide power in different ways, in another attempt to prevent its future abuse. The three main concepts within the constitution are separation of powers, cheques and balances, and federalism.…
We were to examine our Founder and dig deep into their personal views and trepidations in order to represent them accurately and verbally express their concerns in hopes to help mold the Constitution. The Founder chosen for me was George Read who represented the state of Delaware. Understanding his concerns was not a difficult task, because I too am from Delaware and understand the hardships of growing up in a small state. We had to take into consideration the other states’ views. Some of the larger states had ideologies that differed greatly from those of the smaller states. Objectives of the Southern States contrasted those of the Eastern States. A new national government was the goal of the Convention, but many conflicts arose before a decision and a widely reviewed Constitution could be…
The articles of confederation was a written document that established the functions of the national government of the United States after it declared independence from Great Britain. There are many reasons why this document is important. One of those reasons is that this document was created as a governing agreement among the 13 original colonies to fight the revolution and to establish limited federal powers, later known as checks and balances. Another reason why this document is significant was it served as the first national constitution of the United States. Those are just some of the reasons of what the Articles of Confederation were and the significance of the document.…
Why did our Founding Fathers create the Constitution and how is it relevant to our country today? To begin, prior to the creation of the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation was the main document that the people of the United States abided by. The Articles of Confederation was not a well-liked document and therefore, it is not well-known today. This document posed many ongoing issues and challenges for the growing United States. First of all, it granted the states an overarching amount of freedom and power. The government held almost no power and could not collect taxes, enforce laws, build an army, enforce treaties, or have a national court system. Therefore, our Founding Fathers went through the process to implement a United States…
In fear of tyranny and corruption, two arguments against the ratification of the Constitution were that if they increased the power of the central government they would be too far away to help the citizens with their concerns, instead they favored the rights of the states and the active representation of the average citizens. They also argued to keep the unicameral legislature, they believed that local and state governments represented voters more fairly. They also argued that the newly ratified Constitution didn’t guarantee protection for some basic liberties.They also believed that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal court, they said that the federal courts wouldn’t be able to provide justice to the average citizen like state…
Although the ratification of the constitution had a big impact in American history people rights were not revised, they stayed the same before the ratification and after. However it did change politically; establishing branches of government and issues between foreign countries. Also it changed economically, issues over currency and debate over parties. Therefore the ratification of the constitution was a turning point in American history.…
There were many arguments for and against the ratification of the Constitution of the United States. The people that wanted the Constitution to be ratified and people who opposed it were called federalists and anti-federalists. They would get into heated arguments whether or not the Constitution should be ratified. The worst thing about the Constitution is it has no Bill of Rights to protect the people’s rights. Though the Constitution doesn’t have a Bill of Rights, it should be ratified because it would give the government a place to build off of so it would be able to protect the citizens and impose what needs to be imposed.…
The U.S constitution was thought as unconstitutional because the requirements stated in the Articles of Confederation needed to ratify a change were not respected by the economic leaders; such as Jefferson, Washington, Hamilton, etc. Most economic elite members were not in favor of the articles because they wanted a more national economy and military. They went to Philadelphia to create a Constitution, even though it was done disrespectfully and unjustly as the Continental Congress abused their authority, it was done with the intention of creating a more efficient system than that of the Articles of Confederation. As the political philosopher John Locke said “life, liberty, and pursuit of property.” The founding fathers interchanged property to happiness because to them owning land meant success which meant happiness. In wanting a unanimous vote, the articles of confederation strived for extreme equality. They wanted everyone to have a say, however their structure was unrealistic. Results support this, as it took six years for a single agreement for revisions to be made. The Constitution also supports the idea of a democracy, as it requires the majority of the states to agree with a ratification, however it is more realistic. Order is taken into account for the sake of government intervention, while simultaneously providing liberty to the states. After all, the articles of confederation wanted legislative power, so at least a…
This country is in dire need of a reform. Our government holds no type of power. They do not have the power or the authority to enforce laws deemed necessary for the survival of a sound country. Our country cannot be a successful or authoritative government with the Articles of Confederation in place. So we need to make the conspicuous decision of ratifying the Constitution. The Constitution will fill the holes in our government that is created by the Articles of Confederation. It will establish the Executive Branch; which main purpose is enforcing the laws. Another important reason to ratify the constitution is the fact that it establishes the Judicial Branch that interprets the laws, to make sure they are fair to the people.…
After creating the Articles of Confederation, the representatives of each state agreed to make a new, better form of government, the U.S. Constitution. When creating a constitution for our nations, certain citizens wanted to guarantee that there would be a Bill of Rights included in it. These people were called the antifederalist, and they wanted a Bill of Rights to assure that their individual rights would not be taken out of their possession.…
In creating the Constitution, the states had several different reactions, including a rather defensive reaction, but also an understanding reaction. As a document that provided the laws of the land and the rights of its people. It directs its attention to the many problems in this country; it offered quite a challenge because the document lent itself to several views and interpretations, depending upon the individual reading it. It is clear that the founders’ perspectives as white, wealthy or elite class, American citizens would play a role in the creation and implementation of The Constitution.…
Even before the Constitution was ratified, strong argument were made by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison in the Federalist Papers urging the inclusion of a federal form of government to replace the failed confederation. In Federalist Paper No. 9 Hamilton states, "This form of government is a convention by which several smaller states agree to become members of a large one, which they intend to form. It is s kind of assemblage of societies that constitutes a new one, capable of increasing, by means of new associations, until they arrive to such a degree of power as to be able to provide for the security of a united body" (Usinfo.state.gov). The people of the United States needed a central government that was capable of holding certain powers over the states.…
The United States Constitution was ratified and made law September 17, 1789. For Americas yet-to-be history the Framers knew the Constitution had to have a way to grow and change with the people, and their needs. This paper will cover the amendment process, the need for the Bill of Rights, how the Bill of Rights has affected America, what the Bill of Rights have granted American’s, discuss the later amendments, and what effect the later amendments have had.…
This part of the project serves as an introductory note to the main theme of the project which is making of the constitution. The following serves to provide a brief insight into the constitution of India and its codification.…
Ratification of constitution is a deciding task in the United States history. If the thirteen states decide to vote against the ratification of the constitution I would want them to vote in favor of the ratification of the constitution. There are few benefits of ratifying the constitution but there are many drawbacks of ratifying the constitution which I will describe further in this essay. Lack of opinions in law making, lack of equality among states is few of the drawbacks of ratifying the constitution.…