Preview

Rationalism: Is It Irrational To Believe In God?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1502 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rationalism: Is It Irrational To Believe In God?
This essay will discuss whether or not it is rational to believe in God. People have their own will to believe, and as the Canadian Constitution would agree, Canadian’s have a freedom of religion. I plan not to convert the reader to atheism, but merely to establish a conclusion that it is irrational to believe in God. This argument does not have to change the lives of others, but simply to prove that human beings are irrational, starting with our idea of a God. The rationality of God can be disproved on the basis of empirical evidence. The idea of empiricism was developed by John Locke in his Book of Innate Notion, in which he felt, opposite to rationalism, that all of our knowledge comes from, and must be justified with experience (Locke, …show more content…
Anselm presents the Argument of Ontological Doubt stating that, “something than which a greater can’t be conceived does exist – both in understanding and in reality” (Anselm, 39). Meaning, if we can conceive of something than which nothing greater can be conceived, and if we can agree that it is better for things to exist both in the mind and in reality than in the mind alone, it is inconceivable that God does not exist. This appears to be a sound and valid argument but it flaws; if we can conceive of something so great, and if he exists, why does he not show himself, or care for the people suffering in a world he is so much greater than? It is irrational to believe in the existence of any omnipotent being based on the Problem of …show more content…
We are rational in accepting the premises because, for the first premise, we cannot prove it is true. The idea that none of our suffering could have been prevented by a powerful being is absurd, because for the second premise, a wholly good being would want to prevent the suffering of others because this belief is expressed in our basic moral standards (Rowe, 337). Therefore this argument is rational to believe. In our world, this is seen on a daily basis, one of the biggest examples from history being the Holocaust in Europe during World War II, surrounding Nazi Germany. Why would God allow such a negative, suffering, evil event happen in our world, knowing he could prevent it? If he is so holy and good, it would be moral for him to stop human sufferings, but he does not. There must simply be nothing there. It is irrational to believe in an all-powerful, all-seeing being because he is a lie of good morals and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    One burning and enduring problem in philosophy to which we have given considerable examination is the question of the existence of God--the superlative being that philosophers have defined and dealt with for centuries. After reading the classic arguments of St. Anselm and St. Thomas Aquinas, the contentious assertions of Ernest Nagel, and the compelling eyewitness accounts of Julian of Norwich, I have been introduced to some of the most revered and referenced arguments for and against God's existence that have been put into text. All of them are well-thought and well-articulated arguments, but they have their holes. The question of God's true existence, therefore, is still not definitively answered and put to rest; the intensity of this debate probably never will mitigate. Many theologians and academics honestly admit that no matter what any philosopher may assert regarding this topic, whether or not a certain person believes in God's existence is a question of faith and nothing more.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The key idea of the Ontological argument is that God exits in reality as well as in the understanding. Anselm’s first premise states that God exists in the understanding. The second premise states that God might have existed in reality. If something exits only in understanding and might have existed in reality, then it might have been greater than it is as stated in the third premise. If God can only exist as an idea in the mind, then we can imagine something greater than God. But we cannot imagine something that is greater than God. Therefore, God exists.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Buss4

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Emerging markets are nations with social or business activity in the process of rapid growth and industrialization. The economies of China and India are considered to be the largest.[1] According to The Economist many people find the term outdated, but no new term has yet to gain much traction.[2] Emerging market hedge fund capital reached a record new level in the first quarter of 2011 of $121 billion.[3] The seven largest emerging and developing economies by either nominal GDP or GDP (PPP) are China, Brazil, Russia, India, Mexico, Indonesia, and Turkey.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Anselm, using logic that can be deducted about God, it is clear to see that God’s existence is necessary. In the second ontological argument from Anselm, God is the greatest being possible; it is greater to exist by necessity than by contingence, it is therefore, impossible for God to not exist. In this argument, God’s existence is an analytic statement, it is impossible to prove that God exists and although Anselm believes that it does not need to be proven, there is no way of knowing that it is analytic. For example take triangles, every triangle that anyone can ever think of will have 3 sides that all add up to 180 degrees, that is simply a part of what a triangle is. Humans can however, prove this by drawing every possible triangle and testing them to see, with God’s existence that is not possible. For humans to consider his existence as an analytic statement, they would have to go faith and logic alone. In a way God’s existence could be a synthetic statement, which would mean that it would need to proven before the statement was true or not, the reason for this is because whether God exists or not does not prove his existence in reality as Anselm suggests in his argument. Kant would agree with this as he reviews Anselm’s ontological argument by saying that God’s existence is not a predicate, existence may be a part of the concept of God, but it does not proof that God exists.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first line in Anselms ontological argument is “the fool says in his heart there is no god”, from this Anselm can deduce that the fool has an understanding of what god is .The fool has to admit that god is that than which nothing greater can be conceived, as this is the definition of god and is understood by believers and non-believers. Anselm then goes on to say, it is one thing to exist in the mind alone and another to exist in the mind and reality, for example a piece of art can exist in an artist’s mind but it is not until they paint it that it exists in the mind and reality. Anselm views God as ‘that than which none greater can be conceived’. From this definition we can say that god exists in the mind as the greatest conceivable…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the course of time, many philosophers, dogmatic religions and even individual human beings themselves have tried to prove the existence of God. The recurrent question that constantly arises is whether or not you can prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking alone. To that, the answer is no. It is not possible to prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking as you also need to incorporate aspects of faith, but rational thinking helps solidify your beliefs pertaining to God and leaves the answers we cannot conceive rationally up to faith. You cannot understand something outside of your existence rationally because you cannot experience it or see it; you can only theorize, believe and trust in it. You will never be able to reason what you have no knowledge of. In this essay, I will argue that in…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anselm used the Ontological Argument to prove that God’s existence is necessary. The origins of this argument are found in Anselm’s writings, he began with a quotation from a Psalm “The fool says in his heart, ‘there is no God’…” and then reflected on the truthfulness of this. Anselm defined God as ‘that than which nothing greater can be conceived’ assuming you accept this a priori definition Anselm went on to state that anyone who denies God’s existence is a fool. He observed that it is greater to exist in reality than in the mind alone (you would prefer to have a real £20 note than an imaginary one). Someone who doubts God’s existence must have a concept of God in order for them to be able to reject it therefore if the concept of God is the greatest conceivable being then he must exist. He argued that existence was part of perfection, so if God is the greatest being (with all perfections) then it is necessary that he exists otherwise he cannot be the greatest conceivable being and that is not – to Anselm – the definition of God, the very fact that we can conceive of him as the greatest being proves, for Anselm, that he exists. For Anselm someone who denies God’s existence is essentially saying “God, who exists, does not exist”.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke was best known as an advocate of empiricism and for his belief of tabula rasa, or the blank slate. In this way his beliefs were similar to those of the behaviorist school of thought. Locke is known as the father of English Empiricism. Empiricism believes that everyone is born with a blank slate that we fill as we experience life. The knowledge that we gain throughout life is due to our experiences, not through reasoning or thought. Locke believed that there is only the capacity to have ideas in the mind, not to be born with them. He states that all knowledge of the world comes from the experience we have within it, through our perceptions and senses. According the empiricism, every thought that we have is influenced by an experience that we have had. Essentially, according to Locke’s view and empiricism, the only way to know the truth about something is to actually experience it through our senses.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The question of whether there is a God has been debated by many philosophers, religious experts, and even your average citizens. Many of those people have attempted to argue why God is or is not real. This paper is going to present two different arguments by the philosophers: Robin Collins and William Rowe. The first argument by Collins is an argument for the existence of God, who designed our incredibly complex universe. The explanation of Collin’s argument will be followed by Rowe’s argument against the existence of God, which is in relation to intense suffering that exists in this world. With those two arguments at hand, the question is, are the conclusions compatible?…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In fact McCloskey places the bar even lower by referring to the “proofs of” rather than “arguments for” God’s existence, thereby overstating the Theist’s claim. With respect to the “proofs” for God’s existence that McCloskey attempts to deal with, namely the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments, McCloskey offers trivial objections that are easily answered. With respect to arguments for God’s non-existence, McCloskey offers the logical form of the problem of evil which, while rich in rhetoric, does not contain enough logic to necessitate its title. McCloskey ends his article with a pragmatic justification of Atheist, stating that Atheism is more comforting that Theism; a point that is stark in its irrelevance.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several sects from all over Europe made North America their home throughout the 17th century. Beginning with the southern Chesapeake colonies, the North American regions were assembled by their founding nations. English Puritans and Separatists and Spanish Conquistadores eventually formed settlements in the New World; however, Puritans and Separatists and Spanish Conquistadores differed fundamentally in their original motivation to explore the foreign paradise. After facing prosecution in England, the Puritans and Separatists traveled to the New World’s northeast aiming to establish religiously tolerant settlements, whereas the Spanish explored the “West Indies” with hopes to exploit the Southwest’s piñata of expensive metals and non-Christian…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    miss

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    WRITE ABOUT SOME OF THE WAYS MCCARTHY TELLS THE STORY FROM THE TOP OF PAGE 56 TO THE BOTTOM OF PAGE 81.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    A rational belief in God, who is an omniscient, omnipotent and omnibenevolent, is not sustainable due to the evil which exists within the world. This central claim is supported by William Rowe’s evidential argument from evil and the factual premise, which explores instances of intense suffering which could have been prevented with the loss of good or by allowing further gracious evil that of moral and natural kind to occur. Theodicy objects the central claim and supporting argument by offering reasonings as to why God would allow instances of evil to occur and this notion is support by three primary supporting arguments of Theodicy. The first covers the concept of soul-making, the second is that of the free will of humans and the last is the…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the argument for the existence of God based on religious experience. (18) 2. ‘The argument merely indicates the probability of God and this is of little value to a religious believer.’ Discuss. (12)…

    • 2406 Words
    • 69 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Empiricism: the position that knowledge has its origins in and derives all of its content from experience.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays