Preview

Rawls Social Justice

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1866 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rawls Social Justice
Social justice is what people in society owe to one another in a matter of rights. It is whether people have rights and entitlements to certain kinds of political and social arrangements, and as a result, to certain social outcomes. Rawls states that social justice is a type of fairness, where the social cooperation appropriately distributes the burdens and benefits of society (1999: 4). Rawls aims to do this using the theoretical device of the Original Position. The intention of the thought experiment is to establish rules for the basic structure of society that would create a fairer society and advance the interests of the mutually disinterested parties involved. The conclusion about social justice that Rawls comes to is the two principles of the theory of justice as fairness. In this essay I will argue that Rawls’ conclusion about social justice, the theory of justice as fairness, is sound but the methodology using the Original Position and Veil of Ignorance is flawed. Rawls’s theoretical devices of the Original Position and the Veil of Ignorance do not help us to come to sound conclusions about social justice. This will be done by questioning Rawls’ assumption that …show more content…
Yet, this would not account for the pessimism that could be created inside of the original position even when there is no prior knowledge of the concept. It is an innate feeling – parties may not realise that they are leaning towards conservative principles. Some critics believe that Rawls’ conclusion is full of principles that would only be chosen by parties who are “conservative by temperament, and not by men who were natural gamblers” (Dworkin 1973: 500). While Rawls has removed any knowledge of risk aversion, Dworkin maintains that it is possible for this bias to occur naturally inside the original

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Rawls’ Fairness Approach is an appropriate ethical framework to use when assessing this dilemma. This approach questions if everyone involved is being treated fairly (is there favoritism and discrimination?). The Fairness Approach examines how fairly or unfairly the actions of an individual or group distribute benefits and burdens everyone else. With this approach, consistency of treatment among persons is key. The only insistence when treatment must differ is if there is a morally relevant difference between people (Andre, Meyer, Shanks, Velasquez, 1989). There are three different kinds of justice -- Distributive, Restorative, and Compensatory. Distributive justice focuses on the benefits and burdens evenly distributed amongst society’s…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HCM 420 Mastery Exercises

    • 2182 Words
    • 8 Pages

    3. True or false? Rawls' view of social justice includes people making choices to protect those who are in a lesser position in society.…

    • 2182 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the documentary “Drop Out Nation” produced by Frank Koughan a student named Marcus attending Sharps town High School has fallen into cycle of oppression and other types of societal identities. He has not been successful in school because of his problems at home. Marcus’s father is always drunk and is unemployed and his mom likes to drink daily. Marcus did not choose to live that life but it is difficult for him to succeed living in the predicament he is in. His identity is based off of things around him. All he wants to do in high school is play football that is his incentive to stay in school and succeed. In the film he is seen as a nice person who wants to get his family out of that situation. Marcus gets help from the counselor from rides to school to staying at her house.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Awakening of 1735-1745 was a reaction to a decline in piety and a carelessness of morals within the Congregational Churches of New England. Although the Great Awakening stimulated dramatic conversions and an increase in church membership, it also provoked conflicts and divisions within the established church. This striking revival of religious piety and its emphasis on salvation ultimately transformed the religious order of Connecticut. The decline in piety among the second generation of Puritans, which stemmed from economic changes, political transformations, and Enlightenment rationalism, was the primary cause of the Great Awakening.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Pledge of Allegiance is an honorable and commendable mantra. It concludes with, “one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” Justice in the former reference is inclusive for everyone, an entitlement, granted upon birth. John Rawls position of justice is that “everyone should be treated equally and as fair as possible”. Mr. Rawls position parallels the Egalitarian theory of equality and mutual respect. This isn’t necessarily the practice because contrary to the hope for multiple factors are factored in to the outcome.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of justice are also referred to in the article. These theories utilize concepts by John Rawls which include ideas on how to “create an environment of opportunity and access by all to the most comprehensive range of prospects” (Colin, 2012, p. 444). This theory can lead to a society where individuals are given opportunities to succeed.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls bases his Theory of Justice on the intuitive conviction that justice as fairness is the first virtue of social institutions. He argues that in order to ensure fair distributions of advantages in society, a workable set of principles are required in order to determine how institutions ought to distribute rights and duties and to establish a clear way to address competing claims to social advantages. The second principle that Rawls develops stipulates that economic and social inequalities are justifiable so long as the requirements of fair equality of opportunity have been met and if they benefit the worst off in society. Rawls argues that the requirement of improving the conditions of the worst off, known as the Difference Principle,…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A socially just and equal society is arguably one of the most important things a community can hope to establish for itself, as every human being has a set of basic rights that demand to be valued and understood. However, the way those rights are interpreted is theoretically an objective concept which varies from religion to religion, from government to government, and from philosopher to philosopher. A select number of societies have either subverted, or in some instances, completely ignored, the practice altogether. As a result of this, the “true” meaning of social justice has become incredibly blurred. While a general understanding of the idea has been established in the minds of most individuals,…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The issue of distributive justice is relevant in our society due to current thoughts on economic inequality in politics. The political philosophers John Rawls and Robert Nozick have differing views when it comes to the topic of distributive justice. This analyze the positions of John Rawls and Robert Nozick, finding that Nozick’s view of distribution is preferable to Rawls’ difference principle because people deserve to keep what they earn and their earnings should not be taken away from them because that would be a violation of their personal liberties.…

    • 1823 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls Vs Nozick

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Both John Rawls and Robert Nozick have made major contributions to modern political philosophy. Rawls’ most successful philosophical work, “A Theory of Justice,” has helped construct both modern liberal and social democratic concepts of social justice. On the other hand, “Anarchy, State, and Utopia”, Nozick’s most successful philosophical work, constructs a form of libertarianism traditionally associated with John Locke and other philosophers prescribed to individual rights and freedoms. Evidently, both philosophers exhibit two highly distinct political philosophies. One major difference between the two philosophies is the legitimacy of governmental redistribution of wealth. As a result, Rawls and Nozick are at two opposite ends of the political…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people in the modern United States consider themselves as social justice warriors. I'm not gonna lie I actually used to be one too but then I realized that the things that I was protesting about had barely any evidence to support my claims. I didn’t realize that until now and that's why I switched sides. I now believe that some social justice is hurting our country and that's something that I’m willing to fight for.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Levy and Sidel (2005), social justice integrates two discrete concepts grounded in the themes of justice, fairness, and equity. The first theme focuses on the concept that individuals deprived of economic, socio-cultural, political, civil, or human rights are viewed from a privileged vantage point of others who possess the power of influence (Levy & Sidel, 2005), which can be shown through systems of stereotyping specific groups. The authors state the second theme focuses on the belief that society as a collective, has an obligation to guarantee that circumstances are prescribed through policies and procedures that influence mutual conditions that preserve individuals’ health (Levy & Sidel, 2005). They assert that all areas…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Justice Equality

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    America was founded in 1776 with the core idea of freedom and equality for all (time period racism and sexism aside). While the definition of equality and to whom it applies to changes generationally, the meaning behind it has remained. If someone were asked to describe America in one word, 9 times out of 10 they would reply with “freedom”, and would avidly defend it. So why doesn’t the word “equality” come up as often as “freedom” does? Some people treat inequality in the way skeptics treat ghosts; fictional and wholly unimportant. However, inequality is an undeniably real problem, with the social justice movement being one of the only solutions presented thus far. Social justice initiates change and works towards…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with John Rawls that creating a hypothetical contract behind a “veil of ignorance” is the ideal way of viewing justice. First, Rawls argues that this method creates “principles of justice untainted by differences of bargaining power or knowledge” (203). To clarify why I also believe this is the correct position to take, I will define what Rawls means by a “veil of ignorance.” He explains this term saying, “[Parties] do not know how the various alternatives will affect their own particular case and they are obliged to evaluate principles solely on the basis of general consideration” (219). This means that each individual is unaware of “his place in society, his class position or social status, nor does any one know his fortune in the distribution of natural assets and abilities, his intelligence, strength and the like” (205).…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    is making a society in which any sort of inequality is to everyone’s advantage. Since it is to be behind the veil of ignorance, the unknowing chooser does not know what their position would be therefore validating the justness of each position. I am amendable to this theory because, in this argument, there cannot be any sort of systematic exclusion and equality is not necessarily violating freedom. Equal distribution of resources, in my opinion and in Rawls’ reasoning, is just and minimal government interference can be dangerous. Nozick promotes the idea that citizens do not have any moral obligations to one another, but, for a society to work efficiently, everyone must work together and Rawls’ hypothetical sets up a society in which everyone benefits. He addresses that, “There exists a marked disparity between the upper and lower classes in both means of life and the rights and privileges of organizational authority. The culture of the poorer strata is impoverished while that of the governing and…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays