This is a little difficult to answer. The story is not written in such a way so as to express something, at least not according to my interpretation of it. I tend to take things how they are written and because it is a fictional story, there may be a broader or deeper meaning to the piece that I am not seeing. Reading the revies of the pieces on the group discussion this week it became clear that Raymond Carver's writing style resonates with the other students in a way that is different to how I perceive it. With all due respect to the authro, I found the piece to be a bit pointless, It says something, but also nothing at the same time. There is clearly a symbolism I am missing out on here, but i suspect this is due to my lack of rapport with the writer's works. Were I to have a more intimate understanding of his economical writing, I'd be able to delve deeper into and articulate a broader understanding of his works. …show more content…
Again, this question is a challenge to answer, so I wonder if I am not missing the point.
My interpretation of the story is that there is a main theme which is this boy who gets knocked down by a car which seems to set off a chain of events, such as the father appearing seemingly disconnected from the mother's efforts for the child's birthday (he didn't know about the cake). Also, the cake itself, we never learn about whether the cake gets paid for or whether it gets collected. The other point raised in this story, when the parents are at the hospital, is that they realise someone needs to feed the pet. So, I guess one could say that these "parts" of the story are representative of the reality that is this child having been knocked
down.
Yes, I think the evidence is valid. The reason I know this is because each piece of evidence seems typically suited to the scenario being played out, the boy is in hospital so all responsiblities are forgotten in favour of being by the child's bedside.
Yes, I would say the evidence is relavent. in such a short story it is easy to keep an inventory of the moving parts, and in this case this inventory comprises "dropped balls" or the things that tend to fall by the way side in an emergency such as when a child ends up in hospital.
No
I imagine I am going to fight with this question over the next few weeks if I get asked the question relating to a piece of fiction, reason being that I am not convinced any views are being expressed per say. In this case, in The Bath, I neither agree nor disagree. It is merely a story, however if I have been unable to connect with a specific view and there is a way for me to do that, that I could learn, then I would appreciate being pointed in the right direction