Preview

Reading the Constitution.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
703 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reading the Constitution.
In their essay, "How Not to Read the Constitution", Lawrence Tribe and Michael Dorf describe the ways the Constitution has been interpreted by different people. Tribe and Dorf make it clear that the idea that the Constitution should be interpreted based on what the framers original intent was is not the way to read the Constitution, it takes much more than that. Tribe and Dorf also explain that justices do not interpret the Constitution in a way that would please the readers (the people) on purpose, because if that were so then the authority of the Constitution would "lose all legitimacy if it really were only a mirror for the readers' ideals and ideas (p.49)." This means that people have the tendency to interpret the Constitution based on their own beliefs. Also, the justices themselves have their own beliefs and their own interpretations of the Constitution, but they should not come up with a decision based solely on their own opinions. The exact way to read the Constitution is indefinable, therefore in their essay, Tribe and Dorf instead described how not to interpret it and implied that justices should make wise decisions that are not entirely based on their own beliefs, the original intents of the framers made generations ago, or the expectations of the public now.

In the case Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, Planned Parenthood was challenging a Pennsylvania law that placed some restrictions on abortion. Many opponents of abortion hoped that the Supreme Court would use the case to strike down the decision made in Roe v. Wade, which states that a state ban on all abortions is unconstitutional. The majority of the court voted not to do so. This is a good case for providing insight into the way justices interpret the constitution and make their decisions.

Justice of the Supreme Court Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the majority opinion for the case. The majority voted not to overrule the decision made in Roe v. Wade. O'Connor wrote on behalf

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Constitutional Law Outline

    • 32052 Words
    • 129 Pages

    4. Original meaning/intent/application of Constitution/Framers is subject to differing interpretations. See DC v. Heller (Scalia and Stevens reach different conclusions using originalist methods.).…

    • 32052 Words
    • 129 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nix V. Williams Summary

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Reasoning: Justice Burger wrote the decision of the Court, joined by Justice White, Justice Blackmun, Justice Powell, Justice Rehnquist and Justice O’Connor, and reversed the decision of the appellant court.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “Why These Four Justices Rejected Marriage Equality,” the author, Sunnivie Brydum, presents the different views of the justices who disagreed with the newly approved same-sex marriage bill. Recently the United States of America legalized same-sex marriage, and although five of the nine justices voted in favor of it, there were still four justices who expressed their dissent about the new law. The reasons these four justices voted against the law varied, but all four justices had made the same decision of voting against the law. Chief Justice John Roberts claims that the decision should have been made by the majority, not only the Court. The constitution says that justices are only supposed to state what the laws are in a country,…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Not to Read the Constitution is an articles that addresses the abstract qualities of the Constitution and how it should be interpreted as a living, changing document. In 1787, the Constitution was signed, included in this historic document were guaranteed basic rights, fundamental laws and the establishment of America’s national government. However, the Constitution was not America’s first governing document, the Articles of Confederation were. Under the Articles of Confederation America’s national government grew week. The states functioned individually like countries. In result of this, some national leaders decided that the Articles of the Confederation was a fail and it was time to try something new. In 1787, at a convention some delegates…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nfib vs. Sebelius

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When Chief Justice Marshall first established the important principle of judicial review in Marbury v. Madison, his goal was to give the judicial branch a safeguard by expanding the Court’s power and legitimizing the weakest branch of government. As Hamilton pointed out in Federalist 78, the judicial branch “will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution” because it “has no influence over the either the sword or the purse, no direction of either the strength or the wealth of society, and can take no action whatsoever.” He says the Court does not have “FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment, and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm for the efficacy of its judgments” (Fed. 78). The Court has the authority to say whether a law is constitutional, and Marshall gives himself that final authority without addressing enforcement, because the power to enforce belongs to the executive. The Court simply writes the opinion.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I picked this article because it showed that this court case was the first that actually stood up for the right for an abortion. It also really showed the world that you could stand up for your rights, and what you believed in. The impacted that Roe v. Wade had on the interest group Pro-choice. This group changed their name to “National Abortion Rights Action League” after the court case, because they thought they had the government on their side. This article is also on special interest groups, which is what Pro-choice is. A special interest group is a group of people or an organization seeking or receiving special advantages, typically through political lobbying.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the 1970’s the U.S. Supreme Court reviewed the case Roe vs. Wade, which involved a Texas woman named Norma McCorvey, who wanted the right to have an abortion. The historical events of the 20th century laid the groundwork for Roe vs. Wade. Norma McCorvey and her lawyers brought their case to the Supreme Court, hoping the Texas Abortion Law would be revoked. They used the U.S. Constitution’s 9th and 14th amendments to prove that abortion is a constitutional right, which every women should be allowed to have. The Supreme Court carefully reviewed the case, and formed a majority and dissenting opinion. Roe vs. Wade and the decision to legalize abortion continues to have a significant impact on the U.S. today. Roe vs. Wade became one of the…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the most famous Charter decision to date, The Queen v. Morgentaler, the case dealt with the issue of abortion. Parliament thought they had legislated a compromise solution to the problem with that it could…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For this project, I would like to discuss the case of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey in 1992. This case was paramount in changing the way our country handles abortions. I think this topic will be very interesting and informative about how increasingly stringent abortion policies have affected the accessibility of abortions in this country for women. Additionally, it would be important to understand the implication this case had on the topic of women’s’ reproductive rights. First, I found this case interesting because before the results of this case were implemented, abortion rates in the United States were slowly on the rise. Right after this case allowed states to regulate abortion policies, the amount of abortions…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States is a document representing the supreme law do the land. Supreme Court Justices are vested with the power of evaluating this document with corresponding laws and coming up with judgment on their relevancy and constitutionality. However, justices often find themselves at odds on how to decipher the documents original meaning; much like in Obergefell vs Hodges, where Justices Kennedy and Roberts disagree on how the Constitution should be interpreted. In a "Concise Guide to the Federalist Papers," written by Gregory Maggs, the “original meaning” of the constitution is broken down into three different definitions that can be used as foundations for assessing the logic that stems from court opinions. Based off…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is three essential holding of Roe V. Wade first one is the right to abortion before viability, second the state interest protecting the health of the women, third the state restrict abortion after viability. Planned Parenthood V. Casey did not overturn Roe V.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wade was questioned in the 1992 Supreme Court case Casey v. Planned Parenthood. The case involved the 1982 Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act. This act required women to get an informed consent before they could procure an abortion (“Planned Parenthood”). This forced a 24 hour waiting period, during this time women were given information concerning abortion the procedure (McBride, “Casey”). The Act also required minors to get consent from their parents, and if this came to be an issue, courts could let the obligation pass. Wives were also required to notify their husbands about the course of action except in “medical emergencies” (McBride, “Casey”). It also made it essential for Pennsylvania Abortion clinics to report themselves to the state. It was wondered if the Abortion Control Act was constitutional under the 14th Amendment (“Planned…

    • 3793 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roe Vs Wade Essay

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Their argument was based on the 1st, 4th, 5th, 8th, 9th, and the 14th amendments. All of which have the common factor of privacy of an American citizen. The 9th and the 14th are the two main arguments during the case. The 9th amendment supports Roe's case because abortion is not clearly stated within the constitution, so the topic is saved for the people to decide. The due process clause of the 14th amendment supports legalizing abortion as well because it states that the state must respect all legal rights that are owned to a person. Coffee and Weddington fought that abortion was a part of a woman's right to privacy, which is a right owned to a person. According to just these two specific amendments, making abortion illegal would be considered unconstitutional. The Supreme Court finally ruled 7-2 in favor of…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Judiciary Branch

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Before comparing the works of writing and the writers’ opinions, it is necessary to know the basic facts about the organization and function of the judicial branch. A key point about this branch is that it is completely split up and organized in such a manner that if a case is appealed in a lower court, it may be brought to a higher court, and so on if necessary. Both court systems, State and Federal, have a series of courts within themselves as well. Above these courts is the Supreme Court, which is the highest court a case may be presented to in our government. This major court is comprised of one Chief Justice and eight Associate Judges, and functions on the basis of seniority. Lower State and Federal court systems must request for judicial review before the Supreme Court may even review the case at hand by deciding if the case is unconstitutional. Not…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abortion has be an ongoing debate in america, abortion is the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, most often performed during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy. The debate about abortion is whether or not it's ok to kill the embryo, the pro life movement argues that when going through with abortion it's killing a human being. The pro life movement says that the baby has rights and needs someone to defend them. The other side of the argument is that it's the mother's body and as a american has the right of free will and can do what's she thinks is best for the baby and herself. The case Roe V. Wade was one of the first supreme court cases on the matter.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays