Preview

Rear Window

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1056 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rear Window
After many people read novels, and then watch the film, you hear them leave the theater saying that movie was nothing like the book. That can be true, but a movie has to be judged while keeping in mind that it has both a budget and a time limit, which only allows most movies to focus on the crux of the story. However, where books attempt to give a depiction of their characters and capture their essence, a good director can encapsulate and portray the fundamental nature of the characters clearly for the viewer with visualization. Books attempt to give descriptions of their characters through long descriptive details, from whether his hair is black, to the kind of things he eats, to how he acts. Although this can be very explanatory for the readers, I feel that a film’s ability to allow its viewer to actually see, and not attempt to visualize the character in one’s head, is a clear benefit. One master of film that I have a great respect for is Alfred Hitchcock, and one of his many great works was Rear Window. One example of how a film can show us characterization very quickly, but still allow us an understanding of every character, is when L.B. Jeffries, in Rear Window, is talking to his girlfriend Lisa Freemont and his insurance caretaker Stella, and goes around the entire courtyard displaying his neighbors for us multiple times to get a better understanding of them throughout the film. We also get more detail about Jeffries in Hitchcock’s movie than we do about him in the novel. Jeffries in the story is insinuated to be a gimp, “Sure, I suppose it was a little bit like prying, could even have been mistaken for the fevered concentration of a Peeping Tom. That wasn’t my fault, that wasn’t the idea. The idea was, my movements were strictly limited just around this time. I could get from the window to the bed, and from the bed to the window, and that was all (Woolrich, 5).” On the other hand Hitchcock displays for us Jeffries sitting in a wheelchair with


Cited: The Natural. Dir. Barry Levinson. Perf. Robert Redford, Robert Duvall, and Glenn Close. TriStar Pictures, 1984. Rear Window. Dir. Alfred Hitchcock. Perf. James Stewart and Grace Kelly. Paramount Pictures, 1954. Apocalypse Now. Dir. Francis Ford Coppola. Perf. Martin Sheen, Marlon Brando, and Robert Duvall. Zoetrope Studios, 1979 A Scandal in Bohemia. Dir. Paul Annett. Perf. Jeremy Brett, David Burke, and Gayle Hunnicutt. Granada Television, 1984.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Davie Movie Vs Book

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think, hopefully along with you, the reader that books are greater than the movie, especially in this case. For some extra details, here are some good mentions. The book, produced in 1886, had more evidence that Alan had committed the Appin Murder than the movie! Also, the plot and timing of character scenes were off. One example was when Davie asked the woman in the book where the House of Shaws was, in the movie it was a man! Also, in the book, the woman had hatred for the House of Shaws, when in the movie he had no hatred that would of made the movie slightly more…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He uses his analysis of the two media, the book and the film, to make his final argument that filmic novels are not good for screening. While the influence of film in these books, whether fiction or non-fiction novels, justifies in their story telling and development, the vice versa is not true for film (Murray 132-137). Filmic novels are no easier to adopt for film than the traditional novels of the past times. While non-filmic novels give the filmmakers room for interpretation and creativity in their redesign, filmic novels give a framework for the redesign. Creating a film adaptation of such books requires the filmmaker to either create an exact translation of the original or to conceive a new piece of artworks, none which is a hard job as Murray shows in Brooks’ failure to create a great film adaptation of a great book. He ends the article by explaining that filmic novels are not easy for film redesigns due to their complexity (Murray 132-137). Sub-literary novels, he writes, whether filmic or not, make better film redesigns than distinguishable…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    541 farenheit

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When you read a book do you visualize the movie in your head? When books are turned into movies most the time the author’s message is ruined, and the integrity of the novel. When someone writes a novel they write it from their point of view, their vision, it’s their story. But when a director hears, or reads the book they see it differently and from their point of view. Novels become a different novel when turned into a Hollywood movie because no one visualizes the same characters, settings or themes.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ever read a book, and then seen the movie? The book is usually better right? That’s most likely because of the differences. The book is more descriptive most of the time. Events in the book are missing from the movie. Or the movie adds some in.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The movie has some similar and different things than the book. The differences are more important than the similarities. .There are way more differences than similarities.The book is Better than the…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1950’s film Rear Window, director Alfred Hitchcock sets his entire work looking through a man, L.B. Jeffries’ rear window. Because of his broken leg, Jeffries is confined to his apartment, and even to his wheelchair. It is here, in his apartment, that the protagonist watches, or even spies on his neighbors. He draws conclusions on these people, but from a distance: across the apartment-building courtyard. In addition to this physical distance separating Jeffries from his neighbors, his perspective, too, distances him from his conclusions. Only seen through the glass of a window and the lens of a camera, Jeffries’ point of view is confined to only a single vision. We see that this single vision, however, provides Jeffries with an ample amount of information. The avant-garde cinematography combined with the original plot creates a new mean to film. Alfred Hitchcock’s innovative Rear Window allows the audience to bring their own experiences to the film: just as Jeffries draws conclusions on his neighbors from a distance, man too establishes his own perspective in the real world, and brings this experience to the film to understand its meaning.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: The Omega Man. Dir. Boris Segal. Perf. Charlton Heston, Rosalind Cash, Anthony Zerbe, Lincoln Kilpatrick. DVD. Warner Brothers, 1971.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Finding Forrester. Dir. Gus Van Sant. Per. Sean Connery, Rob Brown, and F. Murray Abraham.…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Johnny and Ray

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Walk the Line. Dir. James Mangold. Perf. Joaquin Phoenix, Reese Witherspoon. 2005. Widescreen ed. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment LLC, 2006. DVD…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rear Window

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Last class we viewed the film called Rear Window. The main plot behind this film is the main character, Jefferies, has a broken leg therefore he has to spend 6 weeks in a wheelchair in his apartment. The one form of entertainment he has is to window watch all his neighbors. Jefferies has a girlfriend named Lisa but tells his nurse that he does not want to marry her. After a few weeks Jefferies catches onto his neighbors business. He seems to think one of his neighbors named Thorwall murdered his wife. He gets this perception from weapons being brought into the apartment and a random disappearance of his wife, while some of her belongings stay at the apartment. From here he spends the rest of his time trying to solve this “murder” mystery. He gets help from his girlfriend, a friend and his nurse. Towards the end of the movie the action increases dramatically. Lisa sneaks into Thorwall’s apartment to look for evidence of the murder. While she is in their Thorwall comes back and finds her in his apartment and begins to beat her. The police are then called and Lisa is brought to jail for trespassing. Next Thorwall sneaks into Jefferies apartment and begins to beat him up even though Jefferies is helpless because of his leg. He then pushes him out the window and survives but then breaks his other leg and has to go 6 more weeks’ window watching in his apartment.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: A Few Good Men. Director Rob Reiner. With Tom Cruise, Jack Nicolson, Demi Moore, Kevin Bacon, Kevin Pollack. Columbia Entertainment, 1992.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crucible

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why I think the moviemaker chose those difference between the book and the movie was because in the book there was a narrator to tell you specific things. The narrator is there to tell some background information and make sure you get a better grasp of what’s taking place. So I feel as if in the movie they wanted you to pay closer attention to what was happening. And you have to have some differences between the two. While in the movie you can see more action and can sometimes explain things better by acting out, rather than being written out.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Othello Movie Analysis

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A book can get the message across much easier than a movie can. In a book you can write down what the characters are thinking, feeling, and etc. While in a movie, you can't…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many ways in which both the novel and film can relate to one another but then have its own unique differences…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apocalypse now is a 1979 American epic adventure war film based on the Vietnam War and it is produced and directed by Francis Ford Coppola. It stars Marlon Brando, Robert Duvall, and Martin Sheen. The film is the adaptation of a novel from Joseph Conrad’s “Heart of Darkness” and the screenplay is done by John Milius. The Film Apocalypse now was critically acclaimed and was nominated for the Academy Awards for the Best Picture and the Golden Globe Award for Best Motion Picture in drama. Although there were many production mistake and was postponed several times because Coppola edited many scenes of the film. The Cinematography or cinematic aspects of the film is very important to understand because it includes; music and sound, camera shots, editing, important scenes, characters, shots, Lightening, color and contrasts, and important dialogs. The Music of Apocalypse now is done by Carmine Coppola.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays