Preview

Reasonable Suspicion In School

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
935 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reasonable Suspicion In School
Reasonable suspicion is the act of doing a search because you feel as if there is a problem. And from that, I personally think that warrantless searches of students, whether by police, teachers, or principals, should be allowed by reasonable suspicion. Let's set up an example. If a student starts acting strange or suspicious all of a sudden, there could be something wrong. If you search their bag or locker and find drugs, then you could call the parents and police to solve the problem. The parents could then help the student with why they were doing the drugs and help to stop the habit while restoring their child back to their normal self. If you found any sort of weaponry in the bag, you could then confiscate the weapons, call the police, and stop the problem before it starts. The problem being if the student wanted to shoot up the school. You could get the student sent to therapy for an attitude and …show more content…
Second, the scope of the search must be reasonably related to the rule violation that led to the search in the first place. Because the vice-principal's search of TLO met the Supreme Court's test, it reversed the judgment of the New Jersey Supreme Court and ruled that the marijuana was admissible as evidence.” Another direct quote from the article. This makes the use of reasonable suspicion as a way of warrantless searches fair and completely necessary for all schools to do. It would be necessary for all schools so that we can avoid drug trades, violence, student based shootings, and depressed friends and families. The only down side of a reasonable suspicion search is that people can legally rule it being against the Fourth Amendment. But if they were to do that then an entire Court case would be brought up. But a search out of reasonable suspicion is just to ensure safety in schools and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This case brings the question up of was T.LO's rights broken or not. The fourth amendment is the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. T.L.O is the person who sued because she felt that the contents in her bag were only found because it was searched unlawfully. In Juvenile Court it was decided that there had been no Fourth Amendment violation. T.L.O was searched without probably cause of any illegal activity. The fact that she was smoking cigarettes in school have the principle no reason to think she is dealing marijuana.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case study

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Supreme Court Decision: The search was unreasonable under the 4th and 14th amendments. In arresting officer may search only the area “within the immediate control" of the person arrested, meaning the area from which he might gain possession of a weapon or destructible evidence. Any other search of the surrounding area requires a search warrant.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After this discovery he continued to search the purse thoroughly and found some marijuana, a pipe, plastic bags, money, an index card containing a list of students who owed TLO money, and two letters that signaled her in marijuana dealing. So everything being discovered now will be used against her in court. After the discovering of these items in TLO purse she was taken to the Juvenile Court and received delinquency charges which,in court TLO tried to say that her 4th Amendment was violated but the court said the search conducted by the Vice Principal was reasonable because TLO was a delinquent. On the contrary The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court came to the conclusion that there was a Fourth Amendment violation. The New Jersey Supreme Court said, holding that the search of the purse was unreasonable. She was sentenced to one year probation and brought up on charges by the local authorities. Though the Supreme Court did not say that the Fourth Amendment did not apply to students. The Fourth Amendment states that a search and seizure cannot be lawfully conducted without a warrant or probable cause. However, in a school setting, a search is considered to be reasonable and within the constraints of the Fourth Amendment if there is reasonable suspicion…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    T.L.O. is a case that argued the right to privacy rights at school. The result of this case was that students belongings can be searched but not for no good reason. Furthermore, the case started when a fourteen year old student at Piscataway High School in New Jersey was caught smoking in a bathroom by a teacher. Once the student was caught her purse was then searched by the teacher. Found in the purse was a pack of cigarettes, rolling papers, and a small amount of marijuana. Because of the belongings discovered by the teacher, police were called in and the fourteen year old student openly admitted to selling drugs on school property. Furthermore, during her trial she was found guilty and was put on probation. However, fourteen year old, Terry argued that the search of her purse was a violation of the fourth amendment, “unreasonable searches and seizures.” This case is a great example of a landmark case because it started the beginning of future decisions regarding searches and seizures at…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Perhaps, there is no clearly defined definition of probable cause. However, there are many relevant cases that have been tried and have established guidelines for the determination of what can be construed as probable cause. Two of these are Dumbra v. United States and Brinegar v. United States. The case 1925 case of Dumbra v. United States, the court consented that in order for a search warrant to be granted, the officer who is making the request merely needs to have “reasonable grounds at the time of his affidavit” (Cornell, 2006). The 1949 case of Brinegar v. United States, clearly announces that Probable cause is to be determined according to “the factual and…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp v Ohio

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    iii. For Mapp, the police, who possessed no warrant to search her property, had acted improperly. Any evidence found during the search should have been thrown out of court and her conviction overturned. For the state of Ohio, even if the search was made improperly, the State was not prevented from using the evidence seized because “the Fourteenth Amendment does not forbid the admission of evidence obtained by an unreasonable search and seizure.” Ohio argued that the 14th Amendment does not guarantee 4th Amendment protections in the State courts.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Best V. New Jersey Case

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In order to have reasonable suspicion, school administrators must have sufficient knowledge to believe that a crime has been or is about to be committed. This differs from the grounds of probable cause because the officers must have sufficient and accurate facts to believe that a crime has been or is about to be committed. Reasonable suspicion for school administrators could be as simple as a rumor. Once that rumor is brought to attention, administration is expected to perform an investigation and if a search and seizure is required of them, it must be a search relative to the scope of the issue at hand. For example, a search of a student’s locker or car on school property with the belief that there may be drugs would be a sufficient search where as a strip search of the student’s body would be considered intrusive. The facts of the two cases, Best V. New Jersey and Safford V. Redding, clearly portray the difference between the two…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dlk Dbq Analysis

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is a line between valid and invalid searches. The U.S. government used means of searching in public territory to bust a vast marijuana growing facility. They used a thermal radiation detection device without consent, but in a fair way. The police did not invade private information within the private place. There were suspicions of illegal substance, and they used a new form of technology, which helps make or break the case. With these motives, the government did not go too far in the DLK case.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The authors also state that suspicionless searches teach students that rights do not matter. I disagree with the author's point of view on overstating the dangers of drugs in schools. I believe it is a growing concern in our public school system. How do we expect a student to concentrate in class if he is stoned all the time? I think instituting random school searches should be on a case by case basis by school district. Blankenau and Leeper's article do not raise any issues of escalating school violence. Are weapons growing concerns like drugs are? The authors surveyed responses of Nebraska High School Principles to obtain data on how effective their drug polices have been. The article in this book does not allow me to make any comments on the strengths and weaknesses of their field study because they did not go in depth of what the study…

    • 4872 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. 248, 251, 111 S.Ct. 1801, 1803-04 (1991) the Supreme Court held that a criminal suspect's right to be free from unreasonable searches was not violated when, after he gave a police officer permission to search his car, the officer opened a dosed container found within the car. Consent to search a vehicle inherently encompasses the entire vehicle and its contents, including closed containers. Id. The scope of the search extends to any…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - a school official may properly conduct a search of student’s person if the official has a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed or reasonable cause to believe that the search is necessary to maintain school discipline or enforce school policies.”…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division affirmed the denial of the request to suppress evidence. The New Jersey Supreme Court then reversed the decision and ruled that the exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment applies to the searches and seizures made by school officials. The case then went to the United States Supreme Court. The first thing the U.S Supreme Court did was ordered to rehear the argument about the question of whether the assistant principal violated the Fourth Amendment in T.L.O’s case. After rehearing the argument the court in a 6-3 decision written by Justice Byron R. White ruled that the search of T.L.O’s purse was reasonable under the circumstances. They stated that even though the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizure also applied to public school officials, they may conduct reasonable searches of students with proper authority and probable…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stop and Frisk

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Supreme Court rejected the defendants' arguments. The Court noted that stops and frisks are considerably less intrusive than full-blown arrests and searches. It also observed that the interests in crime prevention and in police safety require that the police have some leeway to act before full probable cause has developed. The Fourth Amendment's reasonableness requirement is sufficiently flexible to permit an officer to investigate the situation. The "sole justification" for a frisk, said the Court, is the "protection of the police officer and others nearby." Because of this narrow scope, a frisk must be "reasonably designed to discover guns,…

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of this paper is assess the limits search and seizure in public schools, apply specific ruling, analyze the New Jersey v. T.L.O. case and explain, recommend changes to existing (specific) laws to create a fairer educational setting in terms of search and seizure and peer review. School officials are responsible for providing a safe and orderly school environment. The officials are required to address disrupting or unsafe behavior that violate school policy and rules. It may require searching of students and their belongings. Dealing with disrupted behavior is a difficult situation that requires decision-making on when, where and how to conduct a search and seizure. My assess limit search and seizure is on hunch or just general search. School officials must have reasonable or proper cause to search.…

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    School Shooting History

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Schools want Police Officers in schools to help prevent incidents that happen in school. In the past there have only been Police Officers in schools to educate the students in the DARE Program and to deal with criminal matters. Now, the Police Officers in the schools have become the first line of defense to prevent or handle school shootings. Law enforcement personnel need to coordinate with school districts to create plans, improve strategies, and examine preventative measures (Farris, 2013). Schools must understand that without the help and support of Law Enforcement, Fire, and Emergency Services they will not have enough resource to fully be prepared for an…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays