Preview

Rebellions during Edward VI's Reign: Political in Origin

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
450 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rebellions during Edward VI's Reign: Political in Origin
The rebellions which occurred during the reign of Edward VI were mainly political in origin
The rebellions which occurred during the reign of Edward VI were mainly religious and not political in origin. The political reasons for the rebellions are that there were absent landlords, mainly because they were in the council, which meant the peasants had no-one to stop them and the incompetent advisors, Peter Carew, sent down to deal with the issue. The religious reasons were that the reforms of Somerset had not gone far enough and the majority of the clergy were uneducated and the common prayer book was produced. The economic reasons for the rebellions were that illegal enclosures were being torn down by government commissions, but the peasants wanted to take matters into their own hands and the sheep tax was hitting the poor harder than it should’ve done.
The political reason for the western rebellion occurring was that the Duke of Somerset wanted to negotiate with the rebels, try to get them to stop by offering items in return. After a number of failed negotiations Somerset decided to send a trusted advisor of his, Peter Carew. Carew travelled down to the rebels and started negotiations, however, by him going down it made it the situation twice as bad. Carew managed to set fire to one of the peasant’s barn and as word spread the number of burns he burnt down turned into two, then four, then a hundred and eventually word got around that Somerset sent an advisor whose main purpose was to burn thousands of poor peasants’ barns. ‘The noise of this fire and burning was spread through the villages and the common people noised and spread it abroad that the gentlemen were altogether bent to overrun, spoil and destroy them’ related Hooker. The political reason for Kett’s rebellion was the absentee landlords. Landlords are supposed to stop peasant uprisings if there are any, making them a bit like a local government, however, the landlord is part of the council and is down

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Edward IV died in 1483, a dispute began between to major factions – the Woodvilles and Richard of Gloucester. The Woodvilles were the family of Elizabeth Woodville, Edward’s wife, with whom he shared many children. Edward V, the heir to the throne, was the son of Elizabeth Woodville, and so this put them in a good position. However, Richard of Gloucester was Edward’s brother and had shown himself to be a very useful and successful man to Edward during his reign. They both had their various strengths and weaknesses, and they both wanted the same thing. Control of England.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the years 1536-69 five rebellions took place, all of which could be interpreted as a dangerous challenge to the monarch and the state, at the same time all of which can be interpreted as not a dangerous challenge instead could even have strengthen the monarch and the state. Source X agrees with the statement as ‘each monarch faced at least one serious revolt.’ Source V suggest that a lack of leadership, organisation and ‘geographic limits’ hindered the success of many rebellions such as the northern rebellion or the pilgrimage of grace. Source W agrees with the statement ‘in the right hands and with the right circumstances’ popular protest in the sixteen century could have posed a dangerous challenge to the monarch and the state. I will interpret these sources to determine whether the rebellions of the 16th century did or did not pose a dangerous challenge to the monarch and the state.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    APUSH Ch

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The one main cause of the Glorious Revolution in England was James II. He aggravated many political authorities in England and rejected all their advice. When James II’s Catholic wife had a son, the parliament had to do something in fear of another Catholic heir to the throne. They didn’t want another James II, and that was in store unless the rebelled. Protestant bishops and parliamentary leaders in the Whig party led the rebellion, backed up by the majority of the people and the military. This resulted in James’ daughter to his first wife to be queen and her husband to be King. This was William of Orange and Mary. They, forced, gave the Whig party more power and created a constitutional monarchy. The rebellion in America was similar, because the one in England sparked it. Puritan leaders and military seized their governor, Andros, and sent him back to England, mainly for his strong support of following the English Church. The poor farmers, whose prices were falling, were tired of being taxed by Catholic officials. This resulted up in the Dominion of England to be broken up. This included the King appointing government officials, land-owning men to vote, and no Puritan restrictions on the Church of England.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tudor governments were relatively successful in dealing with the problem of rebellion, although this was more effective towards the end of the period than at the beginning shown through the decline in rebellion after 1549: only 5 English rebellions occurred as opposed to 10 before 1549. Over the course of the Tudor period the main aims of rebellions were only fully achieved in the rebellions of 1525, the Amicable Grant and 1553. In addition to this the reforms made to local government, policies directly implemented by central government and the effects of trials and retribution, such as Henry VII’s concessions made to the late 15th century pretenders, Lambert Simnell and Perkin Warbeck and later in the period during Elizabeth’s reign, who recognised rebel Shane O’Neil as Earl of Tyrone, all contributed to the reduction in the frequency and scale of English rebellions. Pre-emptive strikes implemented by Tudor governments were also instrumental, especially during the start of the period in Henry’s reign and later in Elizabeth’s reign, in preventing rebellion or stopping riots from becoming dangerous rebellions. In some areas these strategies and tactics worked better in some areas than others; Irish rebellions were generally more costly and more difficult to suppress.…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    How well Tudor Monarchs consulted with their advisers is one factor that can determine if they underestimate the threat posed by rebellions. Henry VII for example dealt with rebellions most effectively with his councillors as he picked his most trusted household servants for advice, In comparison to Henry VIII who left the strategy of combating rebellions to his principal ministers did not deal with rebellion as effectively, as when raising money for the Amicable Grant Wolsey raised £260,000 in forced loans which despite promising to pay back and there was already rising unemployment in the area of the rebellion which added to the resentment and ultimately lead to rebellion.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry was using his meaningful speech that arises from his spirit to convey more trust to his followers. This speech was a good example to show how Henry and all other strong feudal rulers in this era used their strength and unique personalities to amaze and persuade but not to force their people to become their followers. The unique and the highly effective speech and the thoughts of Henry v shows how open were individuals in Elizabethan era about expressing themselves to reveal social or political viewpoints.…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    he primary reason was due to the Stamp Tax, which placed a tax on everyday consumer goods. Colonists by this time had been in the colonies in many cases for 2 generations, so many had never set foot in England. The idea that they had colonized the land and were producing much of England's raw resources, yet did not have representation in the House of Lords or House of Commons to protest taxation lead to the revolt. "Taxation without Representation" was the main issue. The tipping point came when tea, a popular drink of the time, was taxed. The East Indian Company controlled the tea market. From what I've read, they were given a lot of support from the British government and were able to deliver tea to the docks in the colonies avoiding some of the taxes other…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government’s economic policies had also caused discontent. First of all the Corn Law was introduced in 1815 which was to block all foreign corn from being imported into the country, this was done to protect the price of wheat in Britain, as in the time of war farmers did very well and they had lot of demand but not enough supplies to give out. The government simply wanted the landowner to have the same profits as they had during war. There was discontent because of the Corn Laws as there were riots and petitions against it. Another policy introduced was that Income Tax (pay tax on how much you earn) was abolished which did not affect the poor but the rich instead however and the…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bacon's Rebellion was an uprising in 1676 in the Virginia Colony in North America, led by 29-year-old planter Nathaniel Bacon.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is clear that many of the origins of this 'crisis' have their roots in the reign of Henry VIII. He left a very difficult legacy to his successors, but it must be remembered that Somerset provoked the problems already in existence and Northumberland and Mary I then had the difficult task of resolving them. Henry VIII was only one contributing factor to the crisis.…

    • 1997 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Pilgrimage of Grace is regarded as the most serious rebellion in Tudor dynasty. It is a rising against reforms of Henrician government took place in Yorkshire on October 1536. The rebels were discontent about the government's new policies accompanied by Reformation. In this popular rising they expressed their grievances in December Petition (Bush, 1996). Its participants did not constrained to commons; evidence showed that gentlemen and clergy also protested against the government since their interest were eroded in terms of property and liberties (Bush 2009, p.150). Although the traditional historical view regards the Pilgrimage of Grace as a revolt which fought for the defence of Catholicism and angry with religious changes initiated by King Henry VIII, scholars like Davies…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The 1790’s wasn’t the easiest of times for Britain. Revolution overthrowing the monarchy in France caused working-class civilians in Britain to entertain the idea of revolutionizing. This, among other aspects such as the war with France and food supply, meant that Britain, led by Pitt, had to fight off the threat of revolution. It would be a fair statement to make that although Great Britain had big enough threats and factors for revolution to actually happen, the threat lacked a certain spark that could have ignited the revolution, spreading into a full-blown fire across the whole country, helping end the monarchy.…

    • 2322 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people have different ideas about justifiable rebellion, some people may believe if there is a dictating government, absence of individuality, or for the benefit of the people is the time for rebellion. These are all justifiable reason for the purpose of rebellion and they would all be able to be defended with their given reason. For this reason, many people believe all rebellion is justified by the user, since people don’t rebellion without sensible reason. Indicating the idea, rebellion is justified perpetually. In any case, what genuinely characterized a justifiable explanation behind rebellion is as yet known, fortunately the people of these stories have a solid regarding justify rebellion…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Revolutionaries were right for leaving Great Britain Revolutionaries also known as patriots / colonist, are the people who fought to get out of Britain's rule. While as a loyalist or often called "royalist" remained faithful to the British crown. Revolutionaries and loyalist had a rivalry, because they weren't on the same page during the revolutionary war. One side wanted freedom (Revolutionaries) and the other didn’t(loyalist). Patriots were right for leaving Britain for many reasons.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He had, with the help of Wycliffe and John Ball, galvanized thousands of peasants to rise up against the authorities that constricted them to their land unjustly, and temporarily reduced the king into giving concessions. In history, the impact of Tyler was said by Norman Cohn to be 'underestimated. ' He states that 'Tyler 's ability to solely begin an organised uprising is outstanding. ' This is clearly substantial evidence that he was a key individual in the rebellion of Late Medieval Europe. His support dramatically increased as he entered London, despite the fact that he lost discipline of the mob. His demands for an abolition of serfdom, tithes and poll tax were said by Cohn to be 'exceedingly crucial in gaining the support of the workers of London, and thus transferring power from the church and parliament to the people. ' His ideas were supported by Ball 's use of religion to urge equality in society, a view similar to modern day communism. Although Tyler was successful in causing the uprising in the first place, Cohn is wrong in describing him as crucial and influential due to his failure at retaining control of the mob and being tricked by Richard II, which led to his death. Ultimately this caused minimal change to how England was run, as nearly all of the promises made by the king to the mob were overturned. This points towards the fact that Tyler…

    • 4136 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays