After analyzing the literature review the reader can draw their own conclusion on the hypothesis: inmates who receive an education while incarcerated are less likely to recidivate when released; compared to those who are released without having received an education. That being said, the purpose of this research design is to present clear and concise methods on how the hypothesis will be tested and consequently validated. People are incarcerated because they break laws set by society to protect society, does that mean those same people will continue to break laws after completing their sentences? In the research design I will focus on one factor that might prevent recidivism: education. For the purpose of this research design, the definition of recidivism will be held to the standards of Lawrence (1994) “who views recidivism as returning to prison after once being released.” This definition does not account for the inmates that return to jail for technical infractions such violating parole/probation, or people that commit crimes and are punished in ways that do not involve prison time being served. The education levels that I will include are as follows; GED, vocational certification, 2 year degree, and 4 year degree. The inmate population tested will exclude, for obvious reasons prisoners that are on death row, serving life sentences without the possibility of parole, and prisoners that have a sentence longer than five years. The last inmate population might not present itself as obvious in why it is being excluded, which leads to the next stage of observation. The prisoners that will be included in testing are those that have committed any type of crime (to include violent, drug related, etc.) leading to a maximum sentence of five years. The main reason for the limit of five years comes from the unpublished study by Daniel Glaser (1969; 1975) Dennis J. Stevens (1997a, 1994) who caution that “the more male and female offenders are isolated from a law-abiding society and deprived of society’s amenities, the more likely it is that offenders will reject the lifestyles and laws of that society.” The hypothesis will be tested by taking samples and recording observations from prison institutions across the 50 states that implement a correctional education policy; which allow prisoners to attain the educational levels which were mentioned earlier in this research design. I will not account for any of the correctional facilities that do not implement educational rehabilitation programs. The sample size from each correctional institution will be the same, however, since prisons are gender based and/or have a disproportionate age group; the number of samples taken will be the equal in number based accordingly for each institution and the age groups of those samples will be random as to present an unbiased result. The operationalization for the concepts of my hypothesis will be broken down into procedural steps; the number of inmates taken from each correctional facility will be 60, regardless of facility population. Thirty of those inmates will be categorized as the control group and the other thirty will make up the test group. The test group will be monitored during the time that they are receiving whichever level of education they are qualified to undertake at the correctional facility in which they are incarcerated, with the level of education and completion of the program being the main focus of the observation. Inmates who do not complete the educational program continue to be part of the test group and the study observation will continue, with them being paced as an intermediate category; having undertaken some academic curriculum but not completing it, however, they will not form part of the final findings. The inmates that complete their academic goals will be monitored for a period of three years after being released from their respective correctional facilities. The data that will be recorded will be how many of those inmates recidivated after being released and if so how soon after being released. The control group will also be monitored after being released but not while incarcerated, since they will not be receiving an education. Something that should be noted will be the inmates are not asked if they would like to participate in the educational programs, they will be randomly selected after having enrolled in the educational programs of their own accord, likewise inmates that do not pursue any education while being incarcerated will not be asked to not do so. The same three years of observations and standards will apply to the control group, after the observation periods have concluded, in order to validate the hypothesis (the inmates who received and completed a correctional education and are released must recidivate less often than those who did not receive any correctional education), several previous cases (for and against) regarding correctional education and recidivism will be analyzed and compared with the findings of my hypothesis and research design to indicate its validity. One of the cases that provides indication of concurrent outcomes (of this hypothesis) is that of Ryan and Maulding (1994), who reviewed and analyzed an enormous number of articles on correctional education and recidivism and conclude that many of those articles reported a inverse relationship between correctional education and recidivism. Another case that will be investigated and whose findings will be included in the research design will be the argument against the hypothesis conducted by Clarke and Harrison (1992) which argues that offender characteristics are stronger predictors of recidivism rates than the correctional mission or organizational effect itself. In conclusion the research design is meant to validate the theory that educating inmates while incarcerated will reduce the likelihood of them returning to prison once released. If the findings of this research support the hypothesis, I believe that higher education opportunities should become a staple of the rehabilitation process for correctional facilities across the United States in order to reduce recidivism, which in turn might be associated to less crime, less money being spent on incarceration, and a better society overall.
References
Clarke, S., and Harrison, A.L. (1992).
Recidivism criminal offenders assigned to community correctional programs or released from prison in North Carolina in 1989: Report prepared for the North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission 1992. Institute of Government. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Glaser, D. (1969) The effectiveness of a prison and parole system. IN: Bobbs-Merrill
Glaser, D. (1975) Strategic criminal justice planning. Rockville, MA: National Institute of Mental Health.
Lawrence, D. (1994).
Inmates students: Where do they fit in? Journal of the Oklahoma Criminal Justice Research Consortium, 1, 55-63.
Ryan, T.A., and Mauldin, B.J. (1994)
Correctional education and recidivism: An historical analysis. (Report available from University of South Carolina, College of Criminal Justice, Columbia, South Carolina
References: Clarke, S., and Harrison, A.L. (1992). Recidivism criminal offenders assigned to community correctional programs or released from prison in North Carolina in 1989: Report prepared for the North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission 1992. Institute of Government. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Glaser, D. (1969) The effectiveness of a prison and parole system. IN: Bobbs-Merrill Glaser, D. (1975) Strategic criminal justice planning. Rockville, MA: National Institute of Mental Health. Lawrence, D. (1994). Inmates students: Where do they fit in? Journal of the Oklahoma Criminal Justice Research Consortium, 1, 55-63. Ryan, T.A., and Mauldin, B.J. (1994) Correctional education and recidivism: An historical analysis. (Report available from University of South Carolina, College of Criminal Justice, Columbia, South Carolina
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Seventy percent of individuals involved in the correctional system are not institutionalized but rather involved in the community with some form of probation and or parole. (4)…
- 670 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The corrections system in the United States is an ongoing struggle to house and rehabilitate individuals who violate the law. The resources put towards the United States correctional system is substantial but not sufficient. The United States continues to have a rising number of inmates incarcerated and in turn often times face overcrowding issues and shortage of funds to provide other rehabilitation focused classes and programs. The corrections system in the United States has proven to show trends throughout the years since the corrections system was established. In order for the corrections system to improve, it must be analyzed and changed…
- 1193 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The purpose of this chapter is to create a foundation of history and theory, so that as current policies and practices are described, students can link those to theories and goals, in order to critically consider the overall effectiveness and public value of correctional policy. In this chapter, students receive an overview of what corrections is, how it links to the rest of the criminal justice system, and why it is important to study corrections. As the criminal justice system has…
- 1435 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
At some point, most offenders currently incarcerated will be released back into society. In the interest of the offender as well as the community, when they are released back into the community, it is important that the offenders are rehabilitated, able to be self-sufficient, and can deter from future crime. Reentry programs are developed to facilitate these needs. They include services like education, job preparedness, habitation, and any other skills and tools necessary for the offender to survive once they are reintegrated into society. Researchers, and practitioners have conducted research in order to identify what programs best serve the offender as well as the community. Current literature tells us that some reentry programs do work if implemented properly with attention to certain elements. The first element is ensuring that the program is evidenced-based. Programs that are evidenced-based are imperative to the success of…
- 613 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The criminal justice system has multiple functions and takes on many roles within our society. However, there are many areas within the criminal justice field that use improvement and benefit from an overhaul within the system. The largest change within the system can and should be made within the corrections component of law enforcement. Although there are needed changes throughout the system corrections has proven to be the one component that has been ineffective at curbing recidivism in convicted criminals and is currently unable to provide reasonable outcomes for individuals that are released once they complete their sentences.…
- 782 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In 2005, approximately “seven hundred thousand” prison inmates were released. Within three years of reentry, over “fifty percent” returned back to prison for a violation of their parole agreement or a new offense (Freeman). In many ways, certain state legislation contribute to recidivism in the United States as legislators implement laws that produce critical challenges for a group facing more than enough obstacles while reintegrating. One example of lawmaker’s contribution to recidivism would be the barring of the Pell Grant implemented in the1990’s. Pell Grants were used to endorse “higher education” within state…
- 822 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the United States the number of criminals incarcerated in state and federal correctional systems has grown massively over the past several years. The number of those incarcerated has the greatest effect on state and federal correction systems. From 1930 to 1975 the average incarceration rate was 106 inmates per 100,000 adults in the population (Mackenzie, 2001). These numbers remained relatively stable until after 1975 (Mackenzie, 2001). By 1985 the rates were 202 per 100,000. By 1995 it was 411 and by 1997 it was 652 including local jail populations (Mackenzie, 2001). At the end of 1998 more than 1.3 million prisoners were under Federal or State jurisdiction (Mackenzie,…
- 1495 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Nationally ninety-seven percent in jail today will be released and return to their community. Between sixty and seventy-five percent of ex-cons are jobless up to a year after being released. This is a deciding factor to recidivism. Recidivism is the most fundamental concept that pertains to…
- 1589 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
6. White, Carter. (2002). Reclaiming incarcerated youths through education. Corrections Today Volt 64, Issue 2, Apr 2002. Record Number:…
- 1869 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
The first of the four principles of effective intervention is risk principle. Risk principle tells us that intervention programs should use a mix of cognitive and behavioral strategies (Wright, 2012.) This is saying that the intervention should target high risk offenders, to prevent them from reoffending. Research has proved that targeting high risk offenders works more often then targeting low risk offenders. Certain offenses are considered low risk and others high. That is what qualifies you as a low and high risk offender by what offense you committed the first time. Moreover, research also shows that targeting low-risk offenders with intensive treatment can actually increase their reoffending (Latessa, 2010). That is why within the four principles it does not target low right offenders. I agree with this system completely, we should pay more attention to the more serious offenders, because if they did a serious offense in the first place, they will do it again, and we…
- 1175 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Not only has mass incarceration contributed to the depletion of economic resources, but it has also not been proven as an effective means of lowering crime rates. Our current prison system is designed to spend massive amounts of money on warehousing and punishing criminal to then just place them back into society without any of the tools needed to become a constructive member of society, thus resulting in criminal behavior to reoccur. Multiple studies conducted have manifested that “rehabilitation programs, education, therapy, and vocational training have a profound effect on not only bettering the inmate as an overall individual, but on society as well” (….) because these offenders can now become productive citizens that can add to the community.…
- 199 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
References: Foster, B. (2006). Corrections: The fundamentals. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Chapter 6, State and Federal Prisons.…
- 268 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Education is a powerful tool that can transform an individual’s life and provide better options. The crime rate may also decline if a greater number of individuals are educated. The objective of incarceration should be rehabilitation, not punishment. Studies have shown education programs and rehabilitation methods in prison to be effective in terms of preventing re-offense. Rehabilitation is a goal that all prisons should try to achieve. Education and job training for prisoners can result in positive outcomes, including greater stability, independence, and lower recidivism.…
- 557 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Approximately 15,000 state offenders are released from prison each year in Louisiana (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2013). Within five years, nearly half will find themselves back behind bars. As Louisiana has the highest incarceration rate in the world, this State is faced with serious challenges in handling its prison population. The recidivism rate is reasonably high, and the costs for taxpayers are billions of dollars; reducing recidivism in Louisiana is one of the first objectives of the current administration. As the incarceration population continues to grow, the state budget shrinks. Many inmates enter prison lacking education and adequate work experience, and are release with little more than a bus ticket. If inmates leave prison with…
- 1298 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The recidivism rates come into play when looking into providing an education to prisoners. Recidivism rates are the rates that “refers to the relative number of prisoners who, after being released, return to prison or jail because they have committed another crime” (USlegal.com, 2001-2012). The whole point of conducting this study is to determine if first the prisoners are willing to be educated and second if the education provided will help lower the recidivism rates.…
- 3560 Words
- 15 Pages
Powerful Essays