Preview

Reciprocal Tolerance: a National Ideal

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1015 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reciprocal Tolerance: a National Ideal
Reciprocal Tolerance: A National Ideal Stephen L. Carter’s “The Culture of Disbelief” is a sweeping reminder regarding a social trend that pricks the religious sensibility of this devout citizen. The rhetorical situation he isolated craftily confronts his perception of the not so subtle prohibition on public exhibitions of personal belief. Using Stephen Carter’s article as sounding board, this cause and effect paper will show the need for sensitivity to individual belief, diversity, and personal freedom to avert the slippery slope that leads to the rise of discriminatory acts that squelch, prohibit, and prosecute public displays of religious practices (par. 19). This paper is an invitation for reciprocal tolerance that highlights the respectful understanding, appreciation, and celebration of our diversity. The goal is to promote a healthy dialogue that creates an atmosphere that genuinely exhibits the original intent of our Founding Fathers. The Founding Fathers must have thought of the instances Carter cited when they drafted and ratified the First Amendment freedom guarantees. His observation, that “we do no credit to the ideal of religious freedom when we talk as though religious belief is something which public spirited adults should be ashamed (par. 16),” begs for clarification. Are the principles that guaranteed freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and the separation of Church and State the same principles that fuel the despairing culture that dichotomize the public and private treatment of religious identity as lobbied by a select niche in society? In a balanced way, Carter observed that the assault is not just against the display of religious practices but even sacred grounds have been subjected to violation and diminishment. Rulings seemingly asserted that “… it is fine to be religious in private but there is something askew when those private beliefs become the basis for public action (par. 11).” It seems that the voices


Cited: Carter, Stephen L., “The Culture of Disbelief.” The McGraw-Hill Reader: Issues Across the Disciplines, Eleventh Edition, Custom Edition for Wake Tech Community College, Learning Solutions, 2011. 667-677. Print. Lazarus, Emma, “New Colossus,” Sonnet, New York City, 1883.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    religion we see fit—a tenet of American society. After all, the established religions in our society…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Neil J. Young’s We Gather Together: The Religious Right and the Problem of Interfaith Politics is a religious history that seeks to explain American political developments from the years following the second world war through the present day. Young argues that the powerful emergence of the Religious Right at the end of the 1970s was not a political strategy of compromise and coalition building founded ad-hoc on the eve of the election of 1980. Rather, as he demonstrates through meticulous research, it was the “latest iteration of a religious debate that had gone on for decades, sparked by both the ecumenical contentions of mainline Protestantism and by secular liberal political victories” (p. 5). As Young writes, his book examines “the religious…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In our history as a Nation, we have had some conflicts that have arisen when this occurs and it can be difficult to define what it means to have religious freedom. It should not come as a surprise to us that this may be a conflict in our future. Religion is an asset in our human lives that has directed us toward morality from the beginning of humanity as religions have grown in diversity. There is no category to which it belongs; therefore, it is difficult to face this problem head on when there may be some concrete obstacles that cannot be overlooked. As difficult as it may be to say this, there will not be a point in time when there are conflicts, big and small, that some rules where we cannot always accommodate everyone’s needs. Congress has passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) to give individuals more liberty when exercising religion; therefore, not to quell your right to exercise religion and adhere to that “Congress shall make no law…prohibiting the free exercise [of religion]” as stated in the First Amendment.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This abstract reading written by Robert N. Bellah, introduces the idea of a “Civil Religion” and argues that, apart from the normal religious traditions our nation follows, there is an unrecognized “Civil Religion” that becomes evident during national crisis or during high public ceremony. According to Bellah, “there actually exists alongside of and rather clearly differentiated from the churches an elaborate and well-institutionalized civil religion in America.” Bellah points out many different examples to prove his point of how “Civil Religion” has been expressed throughout history. First Bellah points out that every president since Washington has mentioned God in his inaugural speech. Next he points out that the presidents did not refer to any religion in particular. They did not refer to Jesus Christ, or to Moses, or to the Christian church. Last a significant point that Bellah makes refers to the Civil war and “Civil Religion”.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Statements that miscegenation destroys every race that practices it are mistaken. In fact, miscegenation or race mixing emphasizes a commitment to compromise and compassion for all humankind. Critics advocate that allies of miscegenation jeopardize religious fundamentals, such as a Christian 's posterity or a Muslim 's forgiveness. Critics also challenge the excessive amount of propaganda that favors miscegenation arguing that these tactics of acceptance are intensified by media exposure but not morally acceptable. While it is true that the media exposes a great deal of tolerance for miscegenation and do so within legal boundaries, Christians and Muslims have strong belifes in their faith and opposition on miscegenation. Regardless there are millions of people who deny this opposition and feel that their beliefs and compassion supersede the stance and seek to persuade people to look past their prejudices and consider the broader affect of miscegenation. By do that Americans can display their morals in the true form of freedom, in which collective values, rather than separate interpretations will represent the highest supremacy.…

    • 3133 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Van Orden v. Perry

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This case was significant in defining a new line for the placement of religious monuments on government grounds, holding that it is not unconstitutional if the purpose was to reflect American history and tradition. The comparison of the case to McCreary V. ACLU also showed the “highly contextual nature of the Court’s analysis when it comes to public religious displays (Van Orden v. Perry)”.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this article Stephen L. Carter expresses the great deal on the separation of church and state. Carter does a very good job at utilizing his rhetorical devices to really make sure we have the information embedded in our heads by the time we have finished the article. He does this job with the help of exemplification to give you multiple examples and leading proof of the separation of the church and state; the application of pathos because religion can sometimes be a touchy subject to some, so it brings out more of an emotional appeal; and, lastly, he utilizes repetition in a very different manner to keep the reader interested but to make it very clear the point he is getting across.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result of their ideas on the role of government in public and private lives, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison were two of the most influential Founding Fathers. Perhaps their greatest influence was in regard to religion and the separation of church and state. To this day, their writings are influential to how we perceive the role of government in religious matters. Two of the leading writings from Jefferson and Madison are the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom and the Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments, respectively. Both writings were written in a time of great struggle against Patrick Henry and the issue of a general tax to support churches and they both share similar traits in their wording and clear influence…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On January 6, 1941, Franklin Delano Roosevelt gave his “State of the Union Address,” in which he gave four essential human freedoms that everyone, everywhere must possess: Freedom to worship, freedom of speech, freedom from fear and freedom from want. He states these freedoms to be “a definite basis for a kind of world attainable in our own time and generation.” Roosevelt gives the idea that with these four freedoms, people are able to successfully work together in a civilized society. However, there are many instances today where these important freedoms are being challenged, or withheld from the American people. More specifically, people are being challenged on their freedom to worship, or freedom of religion. Freedom of religion is the…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The pledge of allegiance has remained an important part of the American legacy and culture. It takes part in the American school system, in American sports, and in many other areas. Many say that the pledge holds a place in their hearts, where it allows them to show their pride for their country. But in this pledge there are two words that have a tendency ring in the ears of many Americans, “under god.” In a country that is proud of the separation of church and state, we leave these words in a pledge that is said everyday by millions of Americans who believe and trust the right of separation of church of state yet we fail to do this for a major component in American culture. The words “under god” hold little meaning and should not be placed in the pledge of allegiance, they should be removed permanently.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christian Nation Myth

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The myth of the United States of America having been founded as a Christian nation has long been circulated throughout our country’s history. Christian historians were the first to put forth this narrative and in today’s world, website writers and editors have taken up the cause. On the website, WhatChristiansWanttoKnow.com, Robert Driskell peddles the myth in an article entitled, “Was the United States of America Founded As A Christian Nation? A Look at the Facts.” Driskell quotes a number of Founding Fathers out of context and uses them as evidence for a Christian nation as well as uses the first amendment to claim that the Constitution did not intend for a strict separation between Church and State.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1980s and 1990s, political scientists and journalists have reported an increased political activity on the part of religious Americans. The period has seen the rise of the Moral Majority, the creation of the Christian Coalition, and the presidential campaigns of the Reverends Jesse Jackson and Pat Robertson.” (Religion and Politics). Jesse Jackson and Pat Robertson are very influential men who have fought for religious freedom and moral values in this country for years. Some others, who have been influential Christians, are Gary Wilkerson, Franklin Graham and Billy Graham. These men need to be thanked and applauded because they took a stand against a tyrant called the Federal…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Woolf, Virginia. “If Shakespeare Had a Sister.” In A Room of One’s Own. Orlando, FL:…

    • 29134 Words
    • 135 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “What is the difference between tolerance and compromise?” The difference between the two is simple, but usually overlooked. The definition for tolerance is as follows: “to put up with; to bear; to endure.” The definition for compromise is as follows: “to give up (one 's own interest, principles, or integrity.” Do you see the difference? This should help: Christians should receive the outcasts of society, the prostitutes, the homosexuals, the abandoned and abused, but we should receive them into something- the church. Consequently, if we receive them into the Church and don 't protect her, allowing them to continue living in sin, than we are indeed being tolerant-of sin! If this ever be the case, we have compromised. We hear much in public discourse about the need for tolerance, usually presented as the non-judgmental acceptance of all perspectives. Of course, those who stand for truth are often branded as narrow-minded, intolerant and judgmental. Unfortunately, this is often the case when it comes to Christianity. In the following paragraphs, we are going to answer the essay question from the perspectives of Edmund Burke, author of the Reflection on the Revolution, our cultures, and the Scriptures.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Religious freedom is important because it gives a person the right to freely partake of the practices of his or her religion without the government’s or anybody else’s opposition. religious freedom means that you have the right to choose a religion or not religion without the interference of the government. The first amendment of the united states’ constitution gives us the right to practice our own religion or even not religion at all. Religious freedom is a right given to us by God, therefore it can not be taken away from us by anybody else other than God himself. God gave us the right to choose what we want to believe in and what we do not want to believe in, therefore it is not the government's role to take that freedom away from us. I believe that nobody should judge you because of what you believe or do not believe, and that is why I think religious freedom…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics