In Mrs. K’s case, these acts of goodness included offering food without forcing it, scrupulous mouth care, and treatment of pain and other symptoms. Beneficence is to do good and those are the things that will be good for the patient given that artificial nutrition will cause more harm in this case. Doing good also includes offering support to the son regarding his concerns from social work and spiritual care that way he can feel reassured he won’t be hastening the death of his mom but rather doing something good and allowing the course of disease to happen and a natural death as his mom had …show more content…
Although those aspects are an extremely important part of the decision making process, what certainly comes into play, are social, cultural, and religious concerns. Many of this concerns, as with the issue of withholding artificial feeding, are emotionally loaded and tension may exist between the involved parties and depending on the lens through which the situation is viewed. For example, maleficence versus beneficence —will withholding or administering artificial nutrition to someone close to death prolong or hasten death; increase suffering or provide any benefit?. The ability to acknowledge everyone’s emotions, validate them, and then step back to think systematically about all the possible options is part of the ethical and clinical decision making process. In Mrs. K. case, applying all the ethical principles and answering all the questions presented in each step helped me a lot in the decision making process and will be without any doubt a process I will be applying in practice. In this case we can also conclude that the best option will be to withhold artificial feeding and hopefully after acknowledging the patient’s son concerns, he will be able to honor his mom’s wishes and allow her to die as she