Relationship Between Llola V. Fry's Electronics
Fry’s Electronics
The analysis of this paper is the relationship between Llola v. Fry’s Electronics. Llola went to the Fry’s Electronics store to buy some products. The products accrued about $400 dollars. She went to the cashier handing her Fry’s Electronic credit card, where she agreed to the contract to pay the $400 on a credit plan. Llola was making monthly payments including interest charges until one day she could not pay for it anymore due to hardship. Fry’s Electronics made several calls trying to reach her because Llola was not making payments anymore.
One day a man came to Llola’s home address to deliver a letter from the court to attend. Llola knew she had a problem when she was not making payments on her credit card and …show more content…
When Llola opened up a Fry’s Electronics credit card, she fully understands the terms and conditions when she signed and dated the application. Fry’s Electronics stated that the money should be paid back to them when Llola uses their credit card. Fry’s Electronics is the only store has taken the action of this contract because nobody is responsible or obligated to pay Llola’s debt. This is an example of unilateral contract (Rogers, 2012, section 4.1).
A breached contract is a contract when one party does not fulfill the promise according to the contract that was written (Rogers, 2012, section 6.3). Fry’s Electronics loan Llola a credit card stating that she will pay them back what she owes them. Llola did not fulfill her promise and Fry’s Electronics sent her to court. This is an example of a breach contract (Rogers, 2012, section 6.3).
A breached contract is a contract when a person promises to pay the other person but did not fulfill that promise, the person suing for losses can send the person to court to collect the reward that is owed to them. The cure for a breach contract is compensatory damages which are an amount of currency that is given in a civilized action by the court to the person who lost a lot of money (Rogers, 206, section 6.3). The jury can award compensatory damages but the person who is at fault will not experience their own consequences (Gerhardstein, 2016, pp. …show more content…
The person who is in loss of damages can claim those damages loss because the party did not act what was promised on a specific term. Nominal damages that have nothing to do with any economic loss and only gets a reward of a dollar amount. Punitive damages are rewarded in cases when it involves planned and are only awarded in contracts cases in situations involving intentional and terrible breaches. The reason for the punitive damages is that the no one can repeat their bad behavior in the days to come (Rogers, 2012, section 6.3). Punitive damages will be rewarded to the one who is receiving the award that may have a little or many entitlements in civil trial cases (Sharkey, 2003). These are examples of a remedy for a breach
The analysis of this paper is the relationship between Llola v. Fry’s Electronics. Llola went to the Fry’s Electronics store to buy some products. The products accrued about $400 dollars. She went to the cashier handing her Fry’s Electronic credit card, where she agreed to the contract to pay the $400 on a credit plan. Llola was making monthly payments including interest charges until one day she could not pay for it anymore due to hardship. Fry’s Electronics made several calls trying to reach her because Llola was not making payments anymore.
One day a man came to Llola’s home address to deliver a letter from the court to attend. Llola knew she had a problem when she was not making payments on her credit card and …show more content…
When Llola opened up a Fry’s Electronics credit card, she fully understands the terms and conditions when she signed and dated the application. Fry’s Electronics stated that the money should be paid back to them when Llola uses their credit card. Fry’s Electronics is the only store has taken the action of this contract because nobody is responsible or obligated to pay Llola’s debt. This is an example of unilateral contract (Rogers, 2012, section 4.1).
A breached contract is a contract when one party does not fulfill the promise according to the contract that was written (Rogers, 2012, section 6.3). Fry’s Electronics loan Llola a credit card stating that she will pay them back what she owes them. Llola did not fulfill her promise and Fry’s Electronics sent her to court. This is an example of a breach contract (Rogers, 2012, section 6.3).
A breached contract is a contract when a person promises to pay the other person but did not fulfill that promise, the person suing for losses can send the person to court to collect the reward that is owed to them. The cure for a breach contract is compensatory damages which are an amount of currency that is given in a civilized action by the court to the person who lost a lot of money (Rogers, 206, section 6.3). The jury can award compensatory damages but the person who is at fault will not experience their own consequences (Gerhardstein, 2016, pp. …show more content…
The person who is in loss of damages can claim those damages loss because the party did not act what was promised on a specific term. Nominal damages that have nothing to do with any economic loss and only gets a reward of a dollar amount. Punitive damages are rewarded in cases when it involves planned and are only awarded in contracts cases in situations involving intentional and terrible breaches. The reason for the punitive damages is that the no one can repeat their bad behavior in the days to come (Rogers, 2012, section 6.3). Punitive damages will be rewarded to the one who is receiving the award that may have a little or many entitlements in civil trial cases (Sharkey, 2003). These are examples of a remedy for a breach