A path model of factors influencing the academic performance of nursing students
Richard Ofori BEd MSc RNT RMN
Lecturer, School of Nursing, University of Salford, Manchester, UK
and John P. Charlton BSc PhD
Research Fellow, Psychology and Life Sciences Subject Group, Bolton Institute, Bolton, UK
Submitted for publication 30 March 2001 Accepted for publication 13 February 2002
Correspondence: Richard Ofori, School of Nursing, University of Salford, Peel House, Albert Street, Eccles, Manchester M30 ONN, UK. E-mail: r.ofori@salford.ac.uk
O F O R I R . & C H A R L T O N J .P . ( 2 0 0 2 )
Journal of Advanced Nursing 38(5), 507–515
A path model of factors influencing the academic performance of nursing students Aims. The aim of this study was to build and test a model describing some of the psychological processes underlying nursing students’ academic performance. The model hypothesized that age and entry qualifications influence students’ academic motivation (locus of control, academic worries, self-efficacy, and expectations), and that this in turn affects their decisions to seek support, which subsequently influences their academic performance. Rationale and background. A literature search showed that previous academic motivation research is piecemeal. The present work sought to integrate previous findings into a coherent framework as a way of advancing our understanding of the complex interactive nature of the factors influencing student performance. Method. Path analysis was performed on data obtained from questionnaires and university records for 315 students undertaking a preregistration diploma course in nursing at a university in the Northwest of England. Results. Support-seeking was more predictive of student performance than entry qualifications. Support-seeking also mediated the age–performance relationship: greater willingness to seek support led to the better academic
References: Ainley M.D. (1993) Styles of engagement with learning: multidimensional assessment of their strategy use and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 85, 395–405. Andrew S. (1998) Self-efficacy as a predictor of academic performance in science. Journal of Advanced Nursing 27, 596–603. Assor A. & Connell J.P. (1992) The validity of students’ self-reports as measures of performance affecting self-appraisals. In Student Perceptions in the Classroom (Schunk D.H. & Meece J.L. eds), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 25–47. Bandura A. (1982) Self-efficacy mechanisms in human agency. American Psychologist 37, 122–147. Bandura A. (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Bentler P.M. (1995) EQS. Structural Equations Program Manual. Multivariate Software Inc., Encino, CA. Brown G.D. (1993) Accounting for power: nurse teachers’ and students’ perceptions of power in their relationship. Nurse Education Today 13, 111–120. Drew P.Y. & Watkins D. (1998) Affective variables, learning approaches and academic achievement: a causal modelling investigation with Hong Kong tertiary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology 68, 173–188. Entwistle N.J. & Tait H. (1994) The Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory. University of Edinburgh, Centre for Research into Learning and Instruction, Edinburgh. Fearnley S. (1995) Class size: the erosive effect of recruitment numbers on performance. Quality in Higher Education 1, 59–65. Gibbs G., Lucas L. & Spouse J. (1997) The effects of class size and form of assessment on nursing students’ performance, approaches to study and course perceptions. Nurse Education Today 17, 311– 318. Gidman J. (2001) The role of the personal tutor: a literature review. Nurse Education Today 21, 359–365. Gidman J., Humphreys A. & Andrews J. (2000) The role of the personal tutor in the academic context. Nurse Education Today 20, 401–407. Houltram B. (1996) Entry age, entry mode and academic performance on a Project 2000 common foundation programme. Journal of Advanced Nursing 23, 1089–1097. Jeffreys M.R. (1998) Predicting non-traditional student retention and academic achievement. Nurse Educator 23, 42–48. Study limitations The present study has several limitations. First, the data related to students’ support-seeking behaviours and performance with respect to a single module from a course at one university and therefore further work would be required to test the generalisability of findings. This is particularly true for features of the model resulting from post hoc modifica514 Ó 2002 Blackwell Science Ltd, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 38(5), 507–515 Issues and innovations in nursing education Kevern J., Ricketts C. & Webb C. (1999) Pre-registration nursing students: a qualitative study of entry characteristics and course outcomes. Journal of Advanced Nursing 30, 785–795. Lefcourt H.M. (1976) Locus of Control: Current Trends in Theory and Research. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. Levin M.E. & Levin J.R. (1991) A critical examination of academic retention programmes for at-risk minority college students. Journal of College Student Development 32, 323–334. Mahler S., Neumann L. & Tamir P. (1986) The class-size effect upon activity and cognitive dimensions of lessons in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 11, 43–59. McEvoy C. (1995) The report of the Summative Evaluation of Project 2000 in Northern Ireland. National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting for Northern Ireland, Belfast. Meece J.L., Wigfield A. & Eccles J.S. (1990) Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrolment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology 82, 60–70. Meriel Hutton B. (1998) Do school qualifications predict competence in nursing calculations? Nurse Education Today 18, 25–31. Millar R. & Irving P. (1995) Academic locus of control in British undergraduate students. British Journal of Educational Psychology 65, 331–340. Mooney S.P., Sherman M.F. & LoPresto C.T. (1991) Academic locus of control, self-esteem, and perceived distance from home as predictors of college adjustment. Journal of Counselling and Development 69, 445–448. Murray-Harvey R. (1993) Identifying characteristics of successful tertiary students using path analysis. Australian Educational Researcher 20, 64–81. Ofori R. (2000) Age and domain specific entry qualifications as predictors of student nurses’ performance in biological, social and behavioural sciences in nursing assessments. Nurse Education Today 20, 298–310. Palenzuela D.L. (1988) Refining the theory and measurement of expectancy of internal vs. external control of reinforcement. Personality and Individual Differences 9, 607–629. Paris S. & Oka E. (1986) Children’s reading strategies, metacognition, and motivation. Developmental Review 6, 25–56. Perry R.P., Hechter F.J., Menec V.H. & Weinberg L.E. (1993) Enhancing achievement motivation and performance in college students: an attributional retraining perspective. Research in Higher Education 34, 687–723. Pintrich P.R. & DeGroot V. (1990) Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 82, 33–40. Pintrich P.R. & Schunk D.H. (1996) Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Raimondo H.J., Esposito L. & Gershenberg I. (1990) Introductory class size and student performance in intermediate theory courses. Journal of Economic Education Fall, 369–381. Academic performance of nursing students Richardson J.T.E. (1995) Mature students in higher education. An investigation of approaches to studying and academic performance. Studies in Higher Education 20, 5–17. Richardson J. (1996) Why won’t you stay? Nursing Times 92, 28–30. Rotter J.B. (1966) Generalised expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs 80, 1–28. Sadler-Smith E. (1996) Approaches to studying: age, gender and academic performance. Educational Studies 22, 367–379. Salili F. (1994) Age, sex and cultural differences in the meaning and dimensions of achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20, 635–648. Salomon G. (1984) Television is ‘easy’ and print is ‘tough’: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology 76, 647–658. Sandler I., Reese F., Spencer L. & Harpin P. (1983) Person environment interaction and locus of control: laboratory therapy, and classroom studies. In Research with the Locus of Control Construct: Developments and Social Problems, Vol. 2 (Lefcourt H.M. ed.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 187–251. Schunk D.H. (1984) Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behaviour. Educational Psychologist 19, 48–58. Schunk D.H. (1989) Self-efficacy and cognitive skill learning. In Research on Motivation in Education, Vol. 3 (Ames C. & Ames R. eds), Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 13–44. Schunk D.H. (1991) Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist 26, 207–231. Schunk D.H. & Hanson A.R. (1985) Peer models: influence on children’s self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 81, 155–163. UKCC (1999) Fitness for Practice. United Kingdom Central Council Commission for Nursing and Midwifery Education, London. Ullman J.B. (1996) Structural equation modelling. In Using Multivariate Statistics, 3rd edn. (Tabachnick B.G. & Fidell L.S.), HarperCollins, New York, pp. 709–811. Vrugt A. (1994) Perceived self-efficacy, social comparison, affective reactions and academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology 64, 465–472. White J., Williams R. & Green B.F. (1999) Discontinuation, leaving reasons and course evaluation comments of students on the common foundation programme. Nurse Education Today 19, 142–150. Wigfield A. (1994) Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: a developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review 6, 49–78. Wigfield A. & Eccles J. (1992) The development of achievement task values: a theoretical analysis. Developmental Review 12, 263–310. Wood R.E. & Locke E.A. (1987) The relation of self-efficacy and grade goals to academic performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement 47, 1013–1024. Ó 2002 Blackwell Science Ltd, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 38(5), 507–515 515