The purpose of this report is to analyse the relationships between Belarus and Ukraine with the EU. The aim is to discover the benefits and limitations of both parties.
The research shows that both the Belarus and EU can benefit from each other; however, it is extremely difficult for Belarus to be a part of EU due to their human rights record and their strict law. Moreover, Belarus does not agree that complying with the EU is the best direction for the country, since the president does not agree with rules and regulations of the EU. The research also shows that Ukraine can benefit from EU. Nonetheless, they have poor human rights record like Belarus, which prevents them from eligibility of joining the EU. It is arguable that the benefits may offset the drawbacks of joining EU as EU provides stability and improvements in the living condition of both Ukrainians and Belarusian. In addition, the EU would definitely benefit from this relationship. This includes the strong steel industry in Ukraine that will further improve the European economy due to the reduction in border controls between Ukraine and Western Europe.
It is impossible to enter the EU in the near future. Nevertheless, Ukraine and Belarus can still qualify to join the EU if they comply with the rules and regulations that the EU deem appropriate and the fast recovery of their human rights record.
Limitations on the report includes:
The use of an old source from the 1960s
The researchers are based on professional predictions on the benefits of the European Union, should Belarus and Ukraine join the EU.
Introduction
Methodology
For our group project on the EU’s relations with Eastern Europe, we have chosen to focus on Belarus and the Ukraine as we were enticed to the fact that they are both Eastern European countries yet are not members of the EU. topic is current as developments are still being made presently, and therefore we felt this topic was thought provoking as we could
References: Zagorski, A. (2002). ‘EU Policies Towards Russia, Ukraine, Moldova and Belarus.’ Occasional Paper Series. 35 (1), pp.11-13. Baylis, J., Smith, S. & Owens, P. (2011) The Globalization of world Politics, 5thEd. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BBC. (2008) Ukrainians dream of EU future. [Online] [Accessed on 13th October 2012] http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7212672.stm Central Intelligence Agency Dinan, D. (2010) Ever Closer Union: An Introduction to European Integration, 3rd Ed. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publisher. http://ec.europa.eu/trade/creating-opportunities/bilateral-relations/countries/belarus/ (online) (accessed 9/11/2012) European Union Gaydazhieva, S. (2012) Belarus urged to abolish death penalty on world day. [Online] [Accessed on 22nd October 2012] http://www.neurope.eu/article/belarus-urged-abolish-death-penalty-world-day Haas, E Taylor, D. (2001) The Cold War (20th Century Perspectives). Oxford: Hainemann-Raintree Baylis J, Smith S & Owens, (2011), The Globalization of world Politics, 5thEdition Bojcun M, (2001), : European University Institute. PP: 5 Dinan D, Ever Closer Union: An Introduction to European Integration, 3rd Edition Haas E B., (1950–1957) The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces. : , Calif., Stanford University Press, 1958. Taylor D, (2001) The Cold War (20th Century Perspectives) http://europa.eu/about-eu/eu-history/index_en.htm PASOS (2012) Ukraine’s progress towards Visa Liberalisation with the EU