Preview

Rene Descartes Wax Argument

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2076 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rene Descartes Wax Argument
What is dualism? What is the essence of the Res Cogitans? Explain in detail how Descartes discovered this essence. Explain the “piece of wax argument.” What does the “wax argument” prove? How does Descartes prove that corporeal substance exists and that the mind is separate and distinct from the body? * Do you find his argument convincing? Why or why not? Give reasons for your answer. (*Be sure to discuss, God, the distinction between types of ideas, and the distinction between the two substances.)

Dualism consists of substances, which include corporeal things and thinking things. The essence of the mind is thought be the essence of the body but its extension. Human bodies and their properties are objects of sense perception. Minds and
…show more content…
My body and my mind cannot be one and the same, because I should either know both of them or know neither of them. Since I know I am a thinking thing, and know that my body and my mind are two separate things, I can conclude that I am not a bodily thing. Therefore, I am only a thing that thinks." In so arguing, however, Descartes would commit the so-called "intentional fallacy" of basing an argument on what one does not know. If two things had to be either both known or both not known in order to be identical, we could argue that Bruce Wayne and Batman are not one and the same as …show more content…
By "thing," Descartes could simply be using the word as we do today, as an ambiguous throwaway word when we don't want to be more specific. More likely, though, he is using it to mean substance, the fundamental and indivisible elements of Cartesian ontology. In this ontology, there are extended things (bodies) and thinking things (minds), and Descartes is here asserting that we are minds rather than bodies. Of course, "thinking" is also highly questionable. Does Descartes mean only the intellection and understanding that is characteristic of the Aristotelian conception of mind? Or does he also include sensory perception, imagination, willing, and so on? At the beginning of the Second Meditation, the Meditator has cast sensory perception and so on into doubt, but by the end of the Second Meditation, sensing, imagining, willing, and so on are included as attributes of the mind. This question is further explored in the commentary on the next

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phil 101 Questions

    • 4817 Words
    • 15 Pages

    5. What is the point of Descartes' doubt about having a body? Why can't a thing that thinks, an "I think" (cogito), be a body? What is a body?…

    • 4817 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based upon the belief that the mind and body are two separate entities, philosophers, such as Rene Descartes, support the Substance Dualism theory of mind, arguing that the mind, which is a thinking entity, may exist without the body, which is a physical extension, because it is its own individual substance of matter. In Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, he puts all concepts of previous certainty into question, intentionally leaving the reader with skepticism towards the concept of knowledge and mental capacity at large. Further, he continues to contend that the mind is distinctly different than the body and can be innovated due to its ability to think, whereas the body is merely a tangible and measureable dimension with no greater abilities, such as thinking or experiencing emotion. Additionally, Descartes further describes the ideas held by Substance Dualists through detailing that under this theory of mind, all entities are…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes refers the substance in substance dualism to a logical relation. This is where a substance can live independently, so substance dualism is committed to the view that there are two substances, mind and matter which can exist independently of each other. Descartes uses the method of doubt and scepticism to consider what can be certain or unknown. He uses the evil demon tool. ‘I will doubt any belief I cannot be certain…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Substance dualism is a never ending argument in the Philosophy world as it’s been going on for decades. It is the view that the universe contains two important types of entity which is mental and material. The structure of this paper is that four main argument leads to one conclusion. Firstly, I’ll argue about Descartes’s ‘separability argument’ which stands as the definition of Substance Dualism. Secondly, I’ll argue that mental and physical have different and perhaps irreconcilable properties. An argument is not complete without a counter argument which in this case the “pairing” problem that exists in Descartes theory is highlighted and where is the interaction of material and immaterial takes place in our body is argued. Finally, the reply for the counter argument comes in a form of defense and positive argument in favors substance dualism and the weakness with the objection.…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He states that one can understand the mind to exist separately from the body. The middle term of the argument, as noted in the major premise is the separate understanding of two things, and he presents the idea of mind and body as the minor term. Descartes devotes a larger share of the argument to defending the minor premise, perhaps because the idea of body and mind as separate substances is more controversial than a general notion of separate substances as distinct. He goes on to expound not only the idea that the mind and body are separate, but that the essence of the human being lies in its nature as a thinking thing. As thought is the essence of the human being, and the principle attribute of the mind is thought, the mind can therefore be seen as more fundamental to humans than the body. Descartes acknowledges that it is likely for a body to be joined to the mind, however he maintains that one can still conceive of both body and mind as separate substances. And as the essence of the body is extension rather than thought, it is fundamentally less relevant to a thinking…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assess Dualism

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Descartes’s first principle of philosophy, “I think, therefore I am”, makes mind more certain than matter. It also showed that the mind which is a thinking thing can exist apart from its extended body. Hence, Descartes said that the mind is a substance that is different from the body (a substance whose essence is thought). This became known as “Substance Dualism” (view that the mind and body function separately, without interchange) or “Cartesian Dualism” (view that there is a two-way interaction between mental and physical substances).…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Later in his second meditation, as Descartes begins to doubt his own conclusion that he exists as a thinking thing, he goes into an elaborate analogy known as his "wax passage". Comparing the wax to his knowledge of himself, he begins by discussing the physical characteristics which can be known by means of the senses. However, the importance lies in the fact that by heating, the wax can be altered and the sensible properties are no longer the same. He then goes on to explain that even though this occurs, he is still able to mentally grasp the existence of the wax even with new properties. In realizing this, Descartes struggles with how it is he can grasp the wax without relying its sensible characteristics. He decides then that he is actually experiencing a manifestation of an idea that only his mind can perceive, instead of what he senses. He realizes the importance of the fact that something can be perceived…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Official Doctrine: This part deals with the human body and mind, how they are interconnected but still different at the same time. He displays the physical human body to be a public affair and something that all in this world can visually see; the mind however, is a much more private and personal affair. With this belief, humans can have two parts: mind (private) and body (public), these parts play different roles as one can affect the other or completely disguise the other. Ryle states that Descartes may have uncertainties about episodes in the physical world, but does not have any uncertainties when analyzing the state of his mind. For example, say Bob’s mind is expressed, no one but Bob will be able to respond to these expressions (feelings). Changes in both of the worlds can affect one another through the physical and intellectual (mind) aspects and challenges that one may face in their lifetime.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes makes a point that there is a distinction between mind and body. It is in Meditation Two when Descartes believes he has shown the mind to be better known than the body. In Meditation Six, however, he goes on to claim that, as he knows his mind and knows clearly and distinctly that its essence consists purely of thought. Also, that bodies' essences consist purely of extension, and that he can conceive of his mind and body as existing separately. By the power of God, anything that can be clearly and distinctly conceived of as existing separately from something else can be created as existing separately. However, Descartes claims that the mind and body have been created separated without good reason. This point is not shown clearly, and further, although I can conceive of my own mind existing independently of my body, it does not necessarily exist as so.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes views in the Second Meditation is that he tries to clarify the nature of the human mind and how it is better known than the body. He has this theory of we’re just “existing” as in we’re just dreaming or being deceived by an evil demon of some sort. With that happening, he still concludes that we can imagine, hear, and see things. Although our sensory perceptions can be false, they’re still a part of our mind and our thinking. Descartes believes we should doubt our senses because they cannot be trusted and that you also cannot trust your imagination.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wax Argument Descartes

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rene Descartes was an extraordinary philosopher who introduced a new, obscure, way to understanding the difference between the mind and the body. Descartes’ argument seems to be directed to Aristotle, in order to counter Aristotle’s “sensory argument;” in which everything is a conclusion of the senses. Descartes uses the “wax argument” to distinguish between the mind and body, separating the mind into its own form. The use of wax allows Descartes to prove and make his point because the, shall we say, properties of the wax can be easily altered; changing its physical appearance. “Let us take, for example, this piece of wax: it has been taken quite freshly from the hive, and it has not yet lost the sweetness of the honey which it contains; it still retains somewhat of the odour of the flower from which it has been culled; its colour, its figure, its size are apparent; it is hard, cold, easily handled, and if you strike it with the finger, it will emit a sound” (Descartes 283-86).…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the philosopher and info

    • 1158 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Here, Descartes considers three kinds of idea: innate ideas, adventitious ideas, and what are sometimes called factitious ideas. The categories are determined by what appears to him to be differences with respect to the origins of their contents. It will not be until later in the Third Meditation, and arguably not until the Sixth Meditation, that the three categories will be confirmed as genuine. The first category poses no difficulties, for he suggests that he can account for these ideas (their contents) — specifically the ideas of what a thing is, what thought is, and so on — by an appeal to his own nature. He is an existent thinking thing, and so the origin of the contents of the ideas he mentions, the objects they represent, can be traced to this fact about his nature. The last category of idea is also unproblematic, for he can easily account for them again by an appeal to himself. He puts them together, so to speak, out of other ideas that he already possesses. Adventitious ideas, however, do pose an immediate problem, since Nature has always taught him, he says, to think that they are “derived from things existing outside me” (AT VII 38; CSM II 26). So, an account of their origin — that is, the origin of their content — may have to include an appeal to things that exist external to, or independently of, his mind. The problem is that at this stage in the Meditations…

    • 1158 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to understand the problems with relating the mind and body – the concept of Cartesian dualism, as theorised by Descartes needs to be examined. Descartes believed in an independent nonmaterial soul inhabiting and finding expression in a mechanically operated body. Descartes used his own words cogito ergo sum, “I am thinking therefore I exist” as somewhat of an unanswerable means of proof. In an attempt to understand everything and break it down to its most simplest form, Descartes the skeptic attempted to doubt everything in order to understand himself. He argues that he can doubt everything around himself, he can even doubt that his own body exists, however he can no doubt that he is doubting, - he could not doubt the existence of his own self, because he could not doubt it unless there was a self to do the doubting. Further to this point, Augustine writes in his City of God - Without any delusive representation of images and phantasms, I am most certain that I am, and that I know and delight in this. In respect of these truths, I am not afraid of the arguments of the Academicians, who say, "What if you are deceived?" For if I am deceived, I still am.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It can be very simple. Just look at the world and ask yourself, “Is everything material? Or are there things in the world that are not material, but I still know actually exist?” Then, ask yourself a second question, “How can I reach at a definition so that the two cannot be mistaken for one another other?” Descartes defined every material thing as having an extension, which is another way of saying it occupies space. Furthermore, those material things cannot share that space with other things. You must realize water or gas can be reduced to particles, and then they become extended things, so each occupies a unique portion of space. So the first substance that he referred to, which he called ‘res extensa’, is clearly matter. The things not viewed in this sense by Descartes, those which are not extended and do not occupy space, would include our mind, emotions and beliefs. So they must be considered non-material substances. These he referred to ‘res cogitans’, or thought-like things. Now the distinctions between the two are clearly obvious. If you can measure something in space, then it must be a material substance but if you can’t measure it, then it must be a thought-like substance. This is the origin of his mind-body dualism belief. A human being is both matter (flesh and bones) and thought-like things (mind, emotions, and beliefs).…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes says the mind is distinct from the body, or anything physical for that matter. He says, a thinking substance is nonphysical or spiritual in nature (mind), and an extended substance is physical, but not capable of consciousness or thought (body). However, this very claim is also his biggest problem as his mind – body interaction has many critics and to some, can seem invalid. This is mainly due to the challenge by those who ask how mind and body can interact if they are two different substances altogether. Over Descartes' period of teaching, he has conceived many arguments to support his view of the distinction of mind from body. Again, this was not done without its' skeptics.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics