Preview

Report on Drones - Average Pakistani Perspective

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
590 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Report on Drones - Average Pakistani Perspective
Pakistan is currently ranked 112 in 120 nation’s literacy rate scale globally. Being such low on this scale means that majority of population of Pakistan is illiterate. Illiterate people are more influenced from their emotion and think from their hearts.
Righteousness of drones depends on how we think. They are good against this war against terrorism, if one thinks from his mind and statistically. But they are bad if one thinks from his hearts and emotionally. So I think the ultimate reality is the perspective held by majority of people. So I don’t know what is right or what is wrong. I just tend to believe the ultimate reality or perspective held by majority of Pakistanis that drones are bad as they give rise to politics of fear, disgrace to humanity, an issue of national security, collateral damage and continues to produce more terrorists.
What I have learned across various media is that drones are visible to human eye. And when they fly in areas, locals can easily see them hovering on their heads. So I feel this give rise to politics of fear. So I think local feudal there continue to get support from people and exploits them also by promising them solution to their so called “fear”. Drone attacks also defy the basic right of human being. Everybody has a right, that if he is charged, he should be first accounted for blame by court. And after whole legal process, it should be decided that whether blame was right or wrong. I don’t know about inside facts. But what is portrayed, it seems like that America or Pakistan Army decides just upon their assumptions or some evidence that is still not countered by any court that whether person is right or wrong. They then upon their own deductions decides the faith of that terrorist or maybe so called terrorist. This I feel isn’t right. I mean by doing we are defying some of the basic right and that is a clear violation of human rights. No country under a democratic parliamentary system would allow some other country to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    CIA drone strikes have the potential to decimate terrorist organizations in an inexpensive manner and reduces boots on the ground combat for American soldiers. Though, we need expansive and additional congressional oversight of drone strikes and CIA targeting. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) is devoted to regulating and reviewing every aspect of the drone program, however, committee members are often met with denial and restriction of information. We need to make sure our drone program is met with regulation and preemptive strikes must be strictly reviewed in a legal manner prior to, in order to prevent the endangerment of innocent civilians, radicalization and mobilization of extremest retaliation, and to preserve the reputation…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Increased security threats caused by heightened global terror activities, for instance, sectarian groups or Mexican drug empires, has prompted the development of decisive technologies, which will respond directly to the increased sophistication of these radical groups. A reliable technology is the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) commonly known as a drone. The drone not only investigates a terror environment but also conducts aerial strikes. The commencing research will analyze in detail the positive impacts of the drone to homeland security.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There's an explosion, it kills some soldiers but it mostly just destroys some drones in the area. A drone is an unmanned ship controlled remotely. It's morally correct to use drones because it reduces the chance of harming our soldiers, it shows loyalty to our troops, and it's fair for us to use the resourceful technology available to us. If we're using drones rather than soldiers, it's putting fewer soldiers at risk to be harmed. It's not showing loyalty to our country when we're defending the opponent. It's also fair for us to use our technology to our advantage; it's not our problem if other countries lack supplies.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since the introduction of drones in war, the NY Times claims that the “CIA have not committed one civilian fatality, while allowing the troop death rate to decrease dramatically.” During the constant bettering of machinery throughout the world, the use of technology has come to a halt when it comes to an unmanned aerial vehicle. Slowly proving to be more reliable than the average pilot, in the years progressing new found respect has been shown by doubting militaries. In a HALE UAV article written by Carlos Reyes he states that “drones can fly up to 60,000 feet, being able to steadily winds at 15 mph compared to 50 mph winds at 40,000 feet.”(Reyes) and are able to outdo a pilot by almost 10,000 feet, due to the -75 degree weather. Portrayed by the US State Department as drones being useless, the use of drones has relentlessly grown to underestimated levels. A drone is classified as being “a UAV that is able to be controlled and sustain flight for numerous amounts of time, by a remote control”. The art of flying an attacking airplane remotely has made a strong peace appeal to not only the military but the citizens of the United States as well. By allowing the use of Drones in war time tactics, the innovation through this "technological leap" will help decrease in civilian deaths as well as increase in terrorist fatalities.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the following “A Drone War Is Still a War” by Michael Kinsley speaks of the issue that using military drones causes civilian casualty and an unfair advantage. Kinsley addresses that we have already become used to the use of drones and that we treat the fact like a usual tactic of combat. The advantages of using drones is quite obvious. No American lives are put at risk, and the precision minimizes collateral damage, including the deaths of innocents who happen to be nearby. Kinsley states that the disadvantages are when a military option seems less painful, it is more likely to be resorted to. This makes it very easy for politicians such as President Barack Obama who are in favor of no troops on the ground to make a decision to use military drones.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They soar overhead collect intel and are capable of destroying a whole city! Drones often fly in the sky and you don't even notice them because they seem like regular airplanes,but they are capable of much more than just flying around.These Unmanned Aerial Vehicles spy on you daily. Drones should be illegal because they kill innocent humans, promote terrorism, and are expensive to maintain.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drones In Warfare Essay

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should drones be used in warfare? It’s necessary to learn about drones—what they are, and how they are used—before determining the answer. The Air Force calls them Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, or simply UVAs. There are dozens of them flying over countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, providing intelligence and surveillance. Since September 11, 2001, the US has been fighting the “War on Terror”, in which drones are used to kill suspected terrorists. Drones have changed the pattern of warfare and military outcomes.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers, authors of “Anti-Drone Movement Grows: Ethics, Legality and Effectiveness of Drone Killings Doubted”, the use of drones by the U.S. military causes more trouble than what they are worth. Additionally, Zeese and Flowers reiterate their points by detailing attacks which “create situations in which violence begets violence”. However, as drones do collateral damage to objects around an established target, they are able to eliminate a large threat without endangering too many civilian and soldier lives. In fact, drones cause less damage to surrounding areas, use less resources, and are able to stay on for longer periods of times than soldiers. Hence this response paper challenges the viewpoints of Zeese…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On April 12, 2016, the Coalition for Peace Action co-sponsored the Ethical, Moral, and Faith Implications of Drone Warfare conference at New Brunswick Theological Seminary. Alongside of the leadership by Robin Suydam, the Peace Coalition partnered with local Reformed Church in America congregations in order to bring attention to our Interfaith Network on Drone Warfare campaign. This event was highlighted by drone victims accounts as well as excerpts from leading drone warfare documentaries. The evening closed with a riveting speech by former army chaplain, Chris Antal.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    These machines destroy many enemy camps that contain the Al-Qaeda in places such as Somalia and Afghanistan. Drones also “have done so at little financial cost, at no risk to U.S. forces, and with fewer civilian casualties than many alternative methods would have caused.” (Byman). In the face of the riots all around the nation, Obama has called the reduction in America’s reliance to these machines even though they will still remain the government’s main weapon of choice for international warfare. These machines have done the task of killing the main leaders of the terrorist organization that has haunted us for many years and have denied the life of many of their sanctuaries. Knowing that this information was spread around the world, the citizens of America became more accepting of keeping the production of this new technology alive and to make it as strong as ever. Although it has not been the most approved program the military could use, the biggest advantage is that it actually works and it is the most efficient program for terminating enemy troops that the military has ever invested billions of dollars for. Many politicians and regular civilians “think it fair to say that the targeted killing program has been the most precise and effective application of firepower in the history of armed conflict.” (Hayden). From this quote, the reality of war has brought upon the competition of seeing which country’s military can create the strongest weapon possible. Since Al-Qaeda has started the War on Terrorism with America, Obama and the government have worked for many months on created these drones to help reduce the risk of terrorists towards the civilians. According to Michael Lewis, Drones used for war is actually the most humane forms of warfare that could…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It's also influence the world, government and the citizens. In 2008, the CIA began a policy of "signature strikes" a list that targeting individuals base on their daily behaviors. For exaple, the CIA saw a perso with a weird act and they just saying " you want to kill him? yeah, let go ahead and kill him.". Yeah, someone's death by flipping though some flash, no one born for them to kill just by their act and speech related to the 10 amendment that poeple have freedom to their speech. Faisal bin Ali Gaber, a Yemem, who had lost his brother-in-law and his cousin wrote a letter to president "your silence in the face of these injustices only makes matter worse. If the strike was a mistake, the family-like all wrongly bereaved families of this secret air war- dense a formal apologize'', this word in his letter show how he upset with what the government have done to his relative his loved one. Obviously, the drone attacks bring many bad issue to…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Usage in America

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drone use within the United Stated of America has been a very controversial topic of the recent times; therefore, this article is being written to say why drone usage has become so controversial in our country, and all over the world.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Terrorists are human beings that commit terrible acts that in their own minds are justified. Their justifications vary from religion to their economical status to simply finding, “where they belong” within a terrorist organization. These justifications may not be accepted by the public eye; however, to a terrorist, the most important thing is to be able to justify his/her actions whether or not the reason for why they do what they do is accepted by others.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays