Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Republican Party 1856

Good Essays
899 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Republican Party 1856
Ted Pineau
United States History to 1877
SS2500 OA Spring 2014
April 13, 2014
Republican Party Platform of 1856
The Republican Party founded in 1856 was an important political platform in American history. This party emerged from the collapse of the Whig party, taking dome of its economic development policies.1 It merged diverse factions into a new political movement that would dominate American politics for the next seventy-six years, winning fourteen of the next nineteen Presidential elections. It also signaled the end of thirty-six years of political confusion on the issue of slavery in America, ultimately leading to the Civil War. The Republican Party of 1856 was designed to organize a new political viewpoint and to solidify a combination of highly sensitive political forces into a strong and compelling movement.
This new political party, with its history changing platform, arose out of a long and complex sequence of events. In the 1850s America’s culture was crumbling. Decades of political compromise and avoidance on the issue of slavery had kept an uneasy peace. The Mexican-American war added over 500,000 square miles to the U.S. and rekindled sectional competition for slave versus non-slave territory. Ralph Waldo Emerson prophesied, “The United States will conquer Mexico, but it will be as the man swallows the arsenic, which brings him down in turn. Mexico will poison us.”2 The balance between Northern Free states and Southern Slave states in the U.S. Senate had only been maintained by tightly controlling the admission of new states to the Union. In 1820 Missouri was ready to be admitted as a slave state. A key part of this Missouri Compromise of 1820 was to limit expansion of slave states to below the line parallel 36 degrees 30 degrees north. However after the Mexican War, Texas, California, and many other potential states insisted for admission into the Union. This reawakened the slumbering sectional conflict and the free versus slave state controversy.
In 1850 a new Compromise was approved. This was a package of five separate bills that maintained the North and South balance in the Senate by allowing California to join the Union as a free state even though its southern border dipped below the 1820 slave delineation line. This was balanced by admitting Texas as a slave state. Another provision to balance the votes was ending the slave trade in Washington, DC and the strengthening of the Fugitive Slave Act. The Compromise of 1850 was the last great moment for the Whig Party. This party rose as a counter to the Jacksonian Democrats in the late 1830s. It thrived by broadly promoting westward expansion without a conflict with Mexico, supporting transportation infrastructure projects, and protecting untried American businesses with tariffs. The Whigs also benefited from having pronounced leaders in the U.S. Senate, like Henry Clay and Daniel Webster, and attracting popular war heroes to run as their presidential candidates. The resurgence of sectional competition ended their brief moment of political dominance. In 1848 the Whig Party split on slavery with pro-freedom and anti-Mexican War Conscience Whigs and pro-slavery Cotton Whigs.3 The collapse of the Whigs, and the new sectional rivalry, launched new parties, and factions within parties. These reflected the wide range of opinions on slavery from passionate support of slavery to immediate abolition. In the middle were groups that wanted to maintain the Union through various forms of compromise.
On January 4, 1854, Douglas introduced the Kansas-Nebraska Act. This act revoked the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and opened the entire territory to popular sovereignty for determining whether the territories would be free or slave. At this time the Nebraska Territory was the entire Louisiana Purchase. Indiana Representative George Washington Julian commented, “The whole question of slavery was thus re-opened.”4 The debate on the Kansas-Nebraska Act was rowdy. Anti-slavery Free Soil party activists along with anti-slavery Conscience Whigs and Barn Burner Democrats held anti-Nebraska meetings and rallies across the north. These meetings in the winter and spring of 1854 were the earliest spurs of the Republican Party. The anti-Nebraska meeting held in a Congregational church in Ripon, Wisconsin on February 28, 1854, is considered the official beginning of the Republican Party. This meeting led to the Republican state convention in Madison, Wisconsin on July 13, which nominated the first slate of Republicans for that fall’s election.5 The Kansas-Nebraska Act passed the Senate in March and the House of Representatives in early May. President Pierce signed the bill into law on May 30, 1854. Both pro and anti-slave forces moved into the Kansas territory engaging in brutal guerilla warfare over the next five years. The intermittent civil war in what became known as “Bleeding Kansas” even spilled into the U.S. Senate chamber. On May 22, 1856, South Carolina Representative Preston Brooks attacked Massachusetts Senator Charles Sumner in the Senate Chamber clubbing him into unconsciousness.6 This showed the chaotic environment the Republican Party was founded in.
Republican Party representatives and supporters believed that they could make a virtuous change. They extended their focus beyond slavery and into America’s other pertinent issues while solving the upfront ones at the same time. The platform of the 1856 Republican Party was bold and unheard of, adapted from the Whig Party’s ideals and strengthened with even more audacious delegates and supporters. The party was able to unite people across the country and end issues that were decades long. Allowing for the party to transpire its ideas across the nation and into the future. It is arguably one of the most influential platforms in American history.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Presidential victory of the Republican Party in 1860 and the secession of the powerful agrarian states of the South placed the federal government in the hands of the business interests of the North and East. In the years that followed occurred the fundamental change from an agriculture/industry nation to a unified industrial nation. The political changes of the Civil War and Reconstruction were the violent manifestations of this profound change. Statistics of the nation’s economy provide ample evidence of the rapid growth of business and urban life. The Republican Party, the political instrument by which the machinery of the federal government was managed by business interests, enacted a number of laws highly favorable to…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Republicanism: rule by property-owning men of talents and virtue. By 1820s and ‘30s, Democracy: The majority should govern was a fundamental maxim in all free gov.’s. United ordinary Americans in election fever and party organizations, they held together a social order increasingly fragmented by the economic revolution. Promoted political parties that could debate political policies.…

    • 2713 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Republicans favored states' rights and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Between 1800 and 1824 Republican controlled the executive office and both houses of congress. While the three republican leaders of this time. Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and James Monroe shared political ideals, they were vastly different leaders. Each effected significant change in our nation.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the former New York Senator William Seward, the American Civil War arose as a consequence of irrepressible conflict between opposing forces. He believed that had there been a compromise between these forces then the nation could have avoided the war. The paper agrees with the senator's views and takes the perceptive that these opposing forces and not just the failure to compromise by politicians were the origins of the war. Politicians could only have achieved so much, but these opposing forces held a stronger bargaining power than the politicians. The paper discusses these forces and concludes by offering a compromise that could have forestalled the war.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two major political parties, the Democrats and the Whigs, seemed unable to deal with the differences between North and South. By the 1850s, however, most Americans considered those sectional divisions too fundamental to ignore. The Republican Party, conceived out of the great political crisis and the disagreement over the fate of slavery was the prime force behind this crisis, but European immigration, westward expansion, industrialization, and political corruption troubled Americans as well. A handful of Republicans fought against slavery because they believed it was wrong, and hoped for equality for blacks. Most, however, thought that African-Americans were inferior but did recognize their basic humanity and required fundamental human…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * At first the Republican party was a one idea party - opposed the Extension of slavery into the territories / opposed the Kansas Nebraska Act: wanted to keep slavery out of the territories, and to restore the Missouri Compromise…

    • 4794 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Reconstruction the states that resided in the north were primarily Liberal Republican. This was due from Lincoln’s association with the Republican Party, and the role he had on equal treatment for blacks during the Civil War (Boles pg. 570). Also, the term liberal is associated with the progressive party, which means looking forward. In contrast, the south was primarily Conservative Democratic, with the term conservative associated with being stuck in old ways of doing things. This implies that they did not agree upon the equal opportunities among blacks and whites, because they viewed blacks more as servants. This way of thinking stemmed from before the Civil War, when slavery was still in common practice. So, one of the main divisions between the two parties was the issue on race. Today the south is largely associated with the Conservative Republican platforms, and the north being associated with the Liberal Democratic platforms. The purpose of this paper is to explain how the South transitioned from this solidly Democratic region to one that is today largely recognized as solidly Republican, through the platforms of key politicians had on…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the years between 1960-1970, there was an increase in involvement of white southerners in the Republican Party compared to the previous years of whites in the Democratic Party. This is seen as a result of a southern strategy of Conservative Republicans to centralize their campaign towards the Southern United states by appealing to racism against African Americans. “By isolating white southerners as carriers of the racist gene…the southern strategy narrative understates the role of racial reaction on the right.” Not only did they pursue southerners, but also those in the North and West who were dissatisfied with the Democratic Party; a majority of whom did not agree with the ideals set in place by the New Deal, which transformed the…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    National Republican Party Speech The National Republican Party was created on March 20, 1854 in Wisconsin known as the founding meeting. In this speech I will present to you how our great republican party came to be and what significants it has today. The Republic party is made up bye the people known as the wigs in the north and the Democrat party is made up of the wigs in the south. The different party's started because of there different beliefs and view points on slavery. I will now begin my presention with you I hope what anyone gets out of this is what significants the republican party has had on the United Stated of America both in the present and in the past.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Territorial Expansion

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It as a simple morning on the 4th of March 1801, when Thomas Jefferson gave his oath to office in the Capitol Building. A distilled feeling of uncertainty, as America put into office a Democratic-Republican, who caused tension to the federalist party after previously congress had issued the Alien and Sedition Acts. These acts enforced the deportation and imprisonment of illegal aliens by the President from the United States. To counter the acts, Jefferson and James Madison, secretary of state at the time, passed the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions which connotes that states have the right to consider constitutional the federal policy. At the rise of a new century, Jefferson’s inaugural address to a premature nation would officially illustrate America’s ambitions. He emphasized in his speech the importance of having both political parties set aside their beliefs and join together for the good of the Republic. The concept of Manifest Destiny has always been accepted by the mind most Americans, but the manner we achieve it has not always been the cleanest. Jefferson’s address viewed expansion in his address, as a means of “preserving and protecting the American Nation.” The mid-19th century political parties that questioned expansion all helped influence the government policies created before the Civil War.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Election of 1896

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Since the election of 1800, nearly every presidential election presented an electorate whose platform was based off of argarian politics, and relied on argarian voters. After the election of 1896, this was longer the case. The country made a shift from a partially argarian nation to an urban and industrialized nation. The focus of the Republican party had went from a goal to promote economic growth to the need to maintatin and regulate industrialism. With the fall of argarianism as an opposition, the continuance of industrialism in America was not an issue. From the fall of argarianism in poilitics came the prosperity of industrialization.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The political battles during the Gilded Age (1869-1889) were not fought with weapons and lives as was the Civil War directly before them, but with pamphlets, verbal accusations and national ideals. However, were the two most prominent foes vying due to differing economic policies, or were they similar parties that based their separation on national origin, geography, history, and emotion? The basic economic reforms were, in fact, similar, yet the varying ideologies and animosities that remained from prior eras enlarged the gap between Democrat and Republican.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early years of our nation, there was not a great deal of brotherly love, peace and agreement that could be found in the government. Two political parties had evolved that possessed interests that spanned both ends of every argument and political idea. The Federalists believed that the nation should have a very centralized government and stood firm that this would bring about the most order and prosperity. To the contrary, Republicans wanted the rights to stay with the people and States and therefore felt that the federal government should have little control to protect the rights of the people. Many historical documents record the struggles between the two parties. The main struggles revolved around three areas. The first area…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Texas Politics

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Texas is a state that has always been recognized for its size and politics. Elections are a huge part of democratic societies that are intended for citizens to choose their public leaders and approve the policies set by candidates. Political parties and interest groups also play a key role in shaping opportunities for public participation. Most Texans and historians know that the Democratic Party’s historical dominance is important to state politics. It is less likely that people are not aware of the consequences of the one-party system for public participation and democracy in Texas. Like many of the rim South states, the white elitist belonged to the Democratic Party which stemmed from the end of Reconstruction until the late 20th Century. To understand the place of political parties in a democratic nation, Eldersveld, a scholar on the subject gives the definition of party as “a group that competes for political power by contesting elections, mobilizing social interests, and advocating ideological positions, thus linking citizens to the political system” (Hill). Texas can be best understood by analyzing its history as a democratic party turned republican, voter turnout, interest groups and other facets that have an impact on voter trends.…

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Republican Party

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Also known as the GOP or Grand Old Party, the Republican Party is one of the two major political parties in the U.S today. This party promotes conservation or encourages traditional ideas. The three reasons why the Republican Party is to choose are homeland security, Social Security, and war and peace. Eighteen out of forty presidents were Republicans. Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican president and he accomplished a significant amount of goals such as abolishing slavery which shaped our society to how it is today.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays