Preview

Research Analysis and Proposal: What Causes Aggression

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2417 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Research Analysis and Proposal: What Causes Aggression
What Causes Aggression? An Analysis of the Data

Cody Rogers
Psychology 264, Social Psychology
April 4, 2013
Paul Rabideau

What causes Aggression? An Analysis of the Data According to statistics from the American Justice Department, in 2011, there were nearly 16,000 violent crimes committed in America on a daily basis. These violent crimes include aggravated assault, which is defined as “attempting to cause, purposely, or knowingly cause bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon,” but does not include non-aggravated assault, such as third degree assault, which is “causing bodily harm to another person either on purpose or because of reckless acts…which could be caused by their own negligence or even by accident.” This staggering statistic leaves the general public wondering: what causes the aggression behind these crimes. Aggression is “intentional action aimed at doing harm or causing pain.” The action could be either physical or verbal, whether the action is successful or not, it would still be defined as aggression. Over the years, many psychologists have tried to find a solid answer to this question. Some have proposed that aggression is instinctual, because in the past, aggression may have been an attractive trait to females because aggressive males could provide greater protection (Aronson, 2010, p.353). Others have claimed that aggression is situational, or caused by priming, such as watching a violent movie or television show (Aronson, 2010, p.354). Yet some claim that aggression is an optional strategy, and that it is determined by past experiences as well as the current situational context (Aronson, 2010, p.355). Does culture have an effect on aggression? There have been countless experiments conducted to attempt to determine the true cause of aggressive behaviors. First, I will analyze the research and experiments related to instinctual aggression, situational aggression, and optional aggression. Second, I will

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aggression is something that people will experience throughout life whether they are experiencing it directly or indirectly. Throughout the years, aggression has been studied in many different forms and ways. It ranges greatly and can range all the way from destructive behavior down to an insulting remark. Direct aggression would be referred to as a physical altercation or incident and indirect aggression would someone spreading gossip throughout a group of people Aggression comes in many different shapes and sizes. Defining the term aggression has been a major argument throughout the scientific community for many years. The most widely accepted definition of the term aggression was defined by Buss ( 1961: 1) as “a response that delivers noxious…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One social psychological theory of aggression is Bandura’s social learning theory, in which he combines both social and cognitive psychology in his social cognitive perspective of human behaviour. Bandura believed that behaviour was not only motivated by psychological factors but also by more socio-environmental factors. He argued that the individual and the environment were linked, something which he called reciprocal determinism. Bandura believed that the presence of a role model from whom behaviour could be imitated was the key part of the social learning theory, and that this role model would either be similar to the person imitating the behaviour (e.g. same age or gender) or is in a position of power (e.g. celebrities or parents). Despite this the individual imitating the behaviour still needs to have a level of self confidence in order to imitate, which Bandura referred to as self-efficacy.…

    • 731 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bandura’s Social Learning Theory suggests that acts of aggression are learnt through the observation of role models. His original “Bobo Doll” study showed that when exposed to aggressive behaviour small children copied this behaviour, not just by being physically aggressive but even copying the verbally aggressive behaviour. However this study focuses on children who are supposed to learn in this manner, this doesn’t demonstrate that this would also be true in older children or adults who already have a set moral compass that would interfere with copying aggressive behaviours. However Bandura’s later study showed that if children saw someone get punished for aggressive behaviour they were less likely to be aggressive themselves when they were allowed to play with the bobo doll but if they saw someone get rewarded for this aggressive behaviour then they were much more likely to act aggressively themselves, this shows that vicarious reinforcement is important to the learning of aggression through the social learning theory, as receiving direct positive reinforcement leads to people having high self efficacy making them very likely to repeat the aggressive behaviour that they were rewarded for. In terms of aggression this reward could come in many forms such as acceptance from a violent gang they want to be a part of or just attention from a parent or teacher. Moreover, Walter and Thomas' study in 1963 further supported this theory as the results of the study demonstrated that aggressive behaviour was a result of imitation of role models. However, the social learning theory does not explain what triggers aggression. Additionally, the study emphasises nurture and learning through observation - ignoring nature and biological explanations.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Deindividuation theory is a social psychological explanation of aggression. It explains how rational individuals can become aggressive hooligans in a mob or crowd as it suggests that losing their sense of identity and self awareness deindividuates people. Individuals in groups fail to see the consequences of their actions, and the social norms they would normally follow are forgotten and this is when aggressive behaviour occurs. Deindividuation causes people unquestioningly to follow group norms instead of personal norms and sometimes these group norms lead to aggression. According to Zimbardo, in a crowd we feel anonymous and unaccountable and thus are less concerned about negative evaluations by…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aggression is the feeling of anger and hatred that may result in threatening or violent behavior. It is also a physical or emotional expression of the feelings of dissatisfaction arising out of the comparison between what people presently have and what they believe they should have, what they ought to have or what they believe is ideal. The theories of aggression assert that aggression is the inevitable result of frustration or conflict, they affirm that aggression results out of an innate instinct flowing towards destructive tendencies and maintain that aggression arises out of social dysfunction. According to Dollard (1939) the frustration-aggression theory of aggression asserts that aggression is always an inevitable result of frustration.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of twin studies helps explain how there could be genetic factors in aggressive behavior. There are two types of Twin, monozygotic (identical) and Dizygotic (non-identical). If both types are studied in terms of aggression and the M-Z twins are more similar in aggressive behaviour it would suggest there is a genetic influence on aggression. Coccaro et al found that when comparing MZ and DZ twins, over 50 % of variance in aggressive behaviours between MZ twins could be attributed to genetic factors.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The instinct theory of aggression states that aggression is natural and involves innate tendencies that are stable and enduring, meaning they are difficult to modify. It proposes the idea that aggression is a result of survival instinct to protect or survive. Aggression is said to occur in high arousal situations where stressful cues act as triggers for that aggression, often caused by others as a result of retaliation. However, not all people show aggression as a result of high arousal or stressful cues, so this theory lacks some validity when explaining aggression. Also, aggression is shown by different…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Explain and give examples of each type of cause. Which – inner, interpersonal, or external – do you think are most powerful? Why?…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My clinical judgment would suggest that Silla is struggling of generalized anxiety disorder with a mild alcohol use disorder. Generalized anxiety disorder has 6 criterion including; excessive worry that has been occurring more days than not for about 6 months, the individual is having difficulty controlling the worry, the anxiety is associated with three or more of the following six symptoms (restlessness or feeling keyed up or on edge, easily fatigued, difficulty concentrating or mind going blank, irritability, muscle tension, sleep disturbance), symptoms are significantly distressing, disturbance is not attributable to the effects of a substance, and the disturbance is not better explained by any other mental disorder.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The social learning theory is based on operant conditioning which suggests that children learn to be aggressive by observing the behaviour of those around them, particularly the behaviour of significant others, such as parents or elder siblings. By seeing others being rewarded or punished for their behaviour, the child experiences vicarious reinforcement. From these models, children therefore learn about the nature of aggressive behaviour, the situations it is appropriate and its likely consequences. In addition to learning about the likely outcomes of aggressive behaviour, children also develop confidence in their ability to use aggressive behaviour to get what they want. Children who are confident that they will be able to use aggressive behaviour effectively to achieve their ends are high in self-efficacy; those with less confidence in their ability to use aggression are low in self-efficiency and may decide to use other methods.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many social psychological explanations for aggression that try and explain the cause of aggression. The social learning theory originated from work by Tarde who looked at key characteristics of imitation and the ways in which our social behaviours and responses could be shaped by the actions of others.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Norms have also been found to produce aggression in society. People use coercion as an upper hand in…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How has this learner developed academic skills as a graduate student in Current Research on Violent Behavior Course?…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What makes people do inexplicable, terrible, socially unacceptable acts of violence? This question brings to mind the age old psychological theory, Nature vs. Nurture. Are people born predisposed for violence? Is there something genetically different about serial killers and murderers? Can their behavior be explained by a difference in their very make-up? Or are they made violent by seeing violence, having un-supportive and demanding parents, being mentally, sexually, and physically abused? Nature vs. nurture is one of the most sought after answers in the field of psychology and may never be “answered” but can be “understood” I feel study in the minds of serial killers has helped to define exactly what nature vs. nurture really means.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People usually relate the behavior of others to their internal dispositions or to their external situations. A dispositional attribution pertains to the personality of a certain person, whereas a situational attribution pertains to the environmental conditions around an event. For example, if a child was bullying another, it could be considered a dispositional attribution because the kid is just naturally a bully and he has a low self-esteem, or it could be a situational attribution because the kid that he is bullying is annoying and he deserved it. Another cause of bullying is to impress other people. It is easier to bully someone when you have a group of people behind you. Because of social facilitation, people tend to improve their performance and want to better themselves in the presence of others. For some people, they consider making someone else feel bad a way to better themselves. A person that is normally not a bully may tend to become one in a group situation. Although it may not be part of someone's personality to be a bully, this may change because of deindividuation. Because the rest of the group is doing something, a certain person feels more comfortable doing it as well. A kid that may not bully anyone on his own would go along with the crowd in bullying someone because of the loss of self-awareness in a group situation.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics